Wood v. Lucy, Lady Duff-Gordon Case Brief
Audio lesson available for this case
LSD+ subscribers can listen to a recorded discussion of this brief - the full facts, holding, and reasoning in audio form.
Complete case briefs with LSD+
Every LSD.Law brief pairs a full IRAC analysis with opinion summaries at three levels of depth, written by a team of Harvard Law and MIT graduates - a quick synopsis when you are pressed for time, the complete reasoning when you need to go deep.
Adaptive Case Views
Toggle between Flash, Standard, and Expanded. Get what you need, when you need it.
Exam-Ready IRAC Format
We deliver the precise structure professors look for in exam answers.
Complex Cases, Clarified
We break down dense legal reasoning into something digestible, helping you grasp core concepts.
tl;dr: A fashion designer granted exclusive marketing rights to an agent. When sued for breach, she argued the contract lacked consideration because the agent made no express promise. The court implied a promise, finding a valid contract.
Legal Significance: Established that a promise to use reasonable efforts can be implied in an exclusive dealing contract, thereby satisfying the consideration requirement and rendering the agreement enforceable.
Wood v. Lucy, Lady Duff-Gordon Law School Study Guide
Use this case brief structure for your own legal analysis. Focus on the IRAC methodology to excel in law school exams and cold calls.
Case Facts & Court Holding
Key Facts & Case Background
Lucy, Lady Duff-Gordon (defendant), a prominent fashion designer, entered into an agreement with Otis F. Wood (plaintiff). The agreement granted Wood the exclusive right, subject to Duff-Gordon’s approval, to place her endorsements on others’ designs and to market her own designs. In return, Duff-Gordon was to receive one-half of all profits and revenues derived from contracts Wood made. The agreement was for at least one year, renewable annually unless terminated with ninety days’ notice. Wood alleged Duff-Gordon breached the contract by placing her endorsements independently and withholding profits. Duff-Gordon demurred, arguing the contract was unenforceable because Wood did not explicitly promise to use reasonable efforts to market her designs or place her endorsements, thus lacking consideration. The agreement recited that Wood possessed a business organization adapted for such placements and required him to account for monies received and secure necessary intellectual property rights.
Court Holding & Legal Precedent
Issue: Can a promise to use reasonable efforts be implied from the terms of an exclusive agency agreement, thereby constituting sufficient consideration to form a binding contract, even if such a promise is not expressly stated?
Yes, the judgment of the Appellate Division was reversed. The court held Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua. Ut enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exercitation ullamco laboris nisi ut aliquip ex ea commodo consequat. Duis aute irure dolor in reprehenderit in voluptate velit esse cillum dolore eu fugiat nulla pariatur. Excepteur sint occaecat cupidatat non proident, sunt in culpa qui officia deserunt mollit anim id est laborum. Lorem ipsum dolor
IRAC Legal Analysis
About IRAC analysis
IRAC (Issue, Rule, Analysis, Conclusion) is the structure professors expect in exam answers. Each LSD.Law brief states the issue, the governing rule with citations, the court's application of that rule, and the conclusion - the same reasoning pattern you will use on exams and in practice.
Legal Issue
Can a promise to use reasonable efforts be implied from the terms of an exclusive agency agreement, thereby constituting sufficient consideration to form a binding contract, even if such a promise is not expressly stated?
Conclusion
This landmark case firmly established the principle of implying promises, particularly the Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua. Ut enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exercitation ullamco laboris nisi ut aliquip ex ea commodo consequat. Duis aute irure dolor in reprehenderit in volu
Legal Rule
A promise to use reasonable efforts may be implied from the entirety Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua. Ut enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exercitation ullamco laboris nisi ut aliquip ex ea commodo consequat. Duis aute irure dolor in reprehenderit in voluptate velit es
Legal Analysis
The court, through Judge Cardozo, reasoned that the law has moved beyond Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua. Ut enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exercitation ullamco laboris nisi ut aliquip ex ea commodo consequat. Duis aute irure dolor in reprehenderit in voluptate velit esse cillum dolore eu fugiat nulla pariatur. Excepteur sint occaecat cupidatat non proident, sunt in culpa qui officia deserunt mollit anim id est laborum. Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua. Ut enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exercitation ullamco laboris nisi ut aliquip ex ea commodo consequat. Duis aute irure dolor in reprehenderit in voluptate velit esse cillum dolore eu fugiat nulla pariatur. Excepteur sint occaecat cupidatat non proident, sunt in culpa qui officia deserunt mollit anim id est laborum. Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua. Ut enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exercitation ullamco laboris nisi ut aliquip ex ea commodo consequat. Duis aute irure dolor in reprehenderit in vol
Flash-to-Full Case Opinions
Flash Summary
- In an exclusive dealing contract, the agent’s promise to use reasonable