Webb v. McGowin Case Brief
Complete case briefs with LSD+
Every LSD.Law brief pairs a full IRAC analysis with opinion summaries at three levels of depth, written by a team of Harvard Law and MIT graduates - a quick synopsis when you are pressed for time, the complete reasoning when you need to go deep.
Adaptive Case Views
Toggle between Flash, Standard, and Expanded. Get what you need, when you need it.
Exam-Ready IRAC Format
We deliver the precise structure professors look for in exam answers.
Complex Cases, Clarified
We break down dense legal reasoning into something digestible, helping you grasp core concepts.
Case Brief Summary & Legal Analysis
tl;dr: A man who was severely injured while saving another’s life sued the man’s estate to enforce a subsequent promise of lifetime payments. The court held that the promise was enforceable because the moral obligation to pay for a material benefit received constitutes valid consideration.
Legal Significance: This case establishes the “material benefit rule” as an exception to the doctrine of past consideration. A moral obligation arising from a previously conferred material benefit is sufficient consideration to support a subsequent, express promise to compensate for that benefit.
Webb v. McGowin Law School Study Guide
Use this case brief structure for your own legal analysis. Focus on the IRAC methodology to excel in law school exams and cold calls.
Case Facts & Court Holding
Key Facts & Case Background
Plaintiff Webb, while employed at a lumber mill, was about to drop a 75-pound pine block from an upper floor. He saw J. Greeley McGowin, the defendants’ testator, standing directly below. To prevent the block from striking and killing or seriously injuring McGowin, Webb held onto the block and fell with it, successfully diverting its path. In doing so, Webb sustained severe and permanent injuries, crippling him for life. McGowin was unharmed. In consideration for Webb saving his life and for the injuries Webb sustained, McGowin subsequently promised to pay Webb $15 every two weeks for the remainder of Webb’s life. McGowin honored this agreement for over eight years until his death. After his death, McGowin’s estate discontinued the payments. Webb sued the estate to recover the unpaid installments. The trial court sustained the estate’s demurrer, finding the complaint stated no cause of action because the agreement lacked consideration.
Court Holding & Legal Precedent
Issue: Is a subsequent promise to pay for a previously rendered service enforceable when the service, performed without a prior request, conferred a material benefit upon the promisor?
Yes, the promise is enforceable. The court reversed the trial court’s sustaining Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua. Ut enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exercitation ullamco laboris nisi ut aliquip ex ea commodo consequat. Duis aute irure dolor in reprehenderit i
IRAC Legal Analysis
About IRAC analysis
IRAC (Issue, Rule, Analysis, Conclusion) is the structure professors expect in exam answers. Each LSD.Law brief states the issue, the governing rule with citations, the court's application of that rule, and the conclusion - the same reasoning pattern you will use on exams and in practice.
Legal Issue
Is a subsequent promise to pay for a previously rendered service enforceable when the service, performed without a prior request, conferred a material benefit upon the promisor?
Conclusion
This case is a foundational precedent for the material benefit rule, which Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua. Ut enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exercitation ullamco labo
Legal Rule
A moral obligation is sufficient consideration to support a subsequent promise to Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua. Ut enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exercitation ullamco laboris nisi ut aliquip ex ea commodo conseq
Legal Analysis
The court's analysis centers on creating an exception to the general rule Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua. Ut enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exercitation ullamco laboris nisi ut aliquip ex ea commodo consequat. Duis aute irure dolor in reprehenderit in voluptate velit esse cillum dolore eu fugiat nulla pariatur. Excepteur sint occaecat cupidatat non proident, sunt in culpa qui officia deserunt mollit anim id est laborum. Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua. Ut enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exercitation ullamco laboris nisi ut aliquip ex ea commodo consequat. Duis aute irure dolor in reprehenderit in voluptate velit esse cillum dolore eu fugiat nulla pariatur. Excepteur sint occaecat cupidatat non proident, sunt in culpa qui officia deserunt mollit anim id est laborum. Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua. Ut enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exercitation ullamco laboris nisi ut aliquip ex ea commodo consequat. Duis aute irure dolor in reprehenderit in voluptate velit esse cillum dolore eu fugiat nulla pariatur. Excepteur sint occaecat cupidatat non proident, sunt in culpa qui officia deserunt mollit anim id est laborum. Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiu
Flash-to-Full Case Opinions
Flash Summary
- A moral obligation is sufficient consideration for a subsequent promise to