Penncro Associates, Inc. v. Sprint Spectrum, L.P. Case Brief
Complete case briefs with LSD+
Every LSD.Law brief pairs a full IRAC analysis with opinion summaries at three levels of depth, written by a team of Harvard Law and MIT graduates - a quick synopsis when you are pressed for time, the complete reasoning when you need to go deep.
Adaptive Case Views
Toggle between Flash, Standard, and Expanded. Get what you need, when you need it.
Exam-Ready IRAC Format
We deliver the precise structure professors look for in exam answers.
Complex Cases, Clarified
We break down dense legal reasoning into something digestible, helping you grasp core concepts.
Case Brief Summary & Legal Analysis
tl;dr: A telecom company breached a fixed-capacity contract with a bill collector. The court held that a clause waiving “consequential damages,” defined to “include… lost profits,” did not bar recovery of direct lost profits, which were calculated based on the full contract price, not actual work performed.
Legal Significance: A contractual waiver of “consequential damages” that includes “lost profits” in an illustrative list does not, by default, bar recovery of direct, benefit-of-the-bargain lost profits. Courts require manifest intent to deviate from the established legal distinction between direct and consequential damages.
Penncro Associates, Inc. v. Sprint Spectrum, L.P. Law School Study Guide
Use this case brief structure for your own legal analysis. Focus on the IRAC methodology to excel in law school exams and cold calls.
Case Facts & Court Holding
Key Facts & Case Background
Sprint Spectrum, L.P. (Sprint) contracted with Penncro Associates, Inc. (Penncro) for call center services. The agreement, memorialized in a Master Services Agreement (MSA) and a Contract Order, required Penncro to “maintain staffing levels” sufficient for “80,625 productive hours” per month, and obligated Sprint “to pay for 80,625 productive hours per month” at a set rate. This was a fixed-capacity contract, meaning Sprint paid for the availability of labor, not just hours worked. The MSA contained a limitation of liability clause (MSA § 13) stating neither party would be liable for “consequential damages,” which “include, but are not limited to, lost profits, lost revenues and lost business opportunities.” Throughout the contract’s early life, neither party fully performed; Penncro struggled with staffing, and Sprint’s call volume was lower than anticipated, so they informally agreed to bill for hours actually worked. Sprint later terminated the contract for cause, a basis the district court found to be a pretext, thus constituting a breach. Sprint did not contest liability on appeal, focusing solely on damages. Penncro sought its expected profits under the full term of the contract.
Court Holding & Legal Precedent
Issue: Does a contractual clause waiving liability for “consequential damages,” which are defined to “include, but are not limited to, lost profits,” preclude the recovery of profits lost as a direct result of the breach?
No. The contractual waiver of consequential damages did not bar Penncro’s claim Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua. Ut enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exercitation ullamco laboris nisi ut aliquip ex ea commodo consequat. Duis aute irure dolor in reprehenderit in voluptate velit esse cillum dolore eu fugiat nulla pariatur. Excepteur sint occaecat cupidatat non proident, sunt
IRAC Legal Analysis
About IRAC analysis
IRAC (Issue, Rule, Analysis, Conclusion) is the structure professors expect in exam answers. Each LSD.Law brief states the issue, the governing rule with citations, the court's application of that rule, and the conclusion - the same reasoning pattern you will use on exams and in practice.
Legal Issue
Does a contractual clause waiving liability for “consequential damages,” which are defined to “include, but are not limited to, lost profits,” preclude the recovery of profits lost as a direct result of the breach?
Conclusion
This case establishes that to exclude direct lost profits, contracting parties must Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua. Ut enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exercitation ullamco laboris nisi ut aliquip ex ea commodo consequat. Duis aute irure dolor in reprehende
Legal Rule
Under Kansas law, a contractual provision that excludes liability for "consequential damages" Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua. Ut enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exercitation ullamco laboris nisi ut aliquip ex ea commodo consequat. Duis aute irure dolor in reprehenderit in voluptate velit esse cillum dolore eu f
Legal Analysis
The Tenth Circuit, applying Kansas law, focused its analysis on the plain Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua. Ut enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exercitation ullamco laboris nisi ut aliquip ex ea commodo consequat. Duis aute irure dolor in reprehenderit in voluptate velit esse cillum dolore eu fugiat nulla pariatur. Excepteur sint occaecat cupidatat non proident, sunt in culpa qui officia deserunt mollit anim id est laborum. Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua. Ut enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exercitation ullamco laboris nisi ut aliquip ex ea commodo consequat. Duis aute irure dolor in reprehenderit in voluptate velit esse cillum dolore eu fugiat nulla pariatur. Excepteur sint occaecat cupidatat non proident, sunt in culpa qui officia deserunt mollit anim id est laborum. Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua. Ut enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exercitation ullamco laboris nisi ut aliquip ex ea commodo consequat. Duis aute irure dolor in reprehenderit in voluptate velit esse cillum dolore eu fugiat nulla pariatur. Excepteur sint occaecat cupidatat non proident, sunt in culpa qui officia deserunt mollit anim id est laborum. Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua. Ut enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exercitation ullamco laboris nisi ut aliquip ex ea commodo consequat. Duis aute irure dolor in reprehenderit in voluptate velit esse cillum dolore eu fugiat nulla pariatur. Excepteur sint occaecat cupi
Flash-to-Full Case Opinions
Flash Summary
- A contract clause waiving “consequential damages,” defined to “include…lost profits,” bars