Paul Reid and Mary J. Reid v. Key Bank of Southern Maine, Inc., Paul Reid and Mary J. Reid v. Key Bank of Southern Maine, Inc. Case Brief
Complete case briefs with LSD+
Every LSD.Law brief pairs a full IRAC analysis with opinion summaries at three levels of depth, written by a team of Harvard Law and MIT graduates - a quick synopsis when you are pressed for time, the complete reasoning when you need to go deep.
Adaptive Case Views
Toggle between Flash, Standard, and Expanded. Get what you need, when you need it.
Exam-Ready IRAC Format
We deliver the precise structure professors look for in exam answers.
Complex Cases, Clarified
We break down dense legal reasoning into something digestible, helping you grasp core concepts.
Case Brief Summary & Legal Analysis
tl;dr: A borrower’s business collapsed after their bank abruptly terminated a line of credit. The court affirmed a jury verdict for the borrower, finding the bank breached the implied covenant of good faith and fair dealing, even though the loan agreement contained a “demand” provision.
Legal Significance: Establishes that the UCC’s implied covenant of good faith and fair dealing applies to lender-borrower agreements, creating a cause of action for breach, and that a “demand” provision does not automatically negate this duty when the overall agreement suggests a continuing relationship.
Case Facts & Court Holding
Key Facts & Case Background
Plaintiffs Paul and Mary Reid had an ongoing business relationship with Depositors Trust Co., Key Bank’s predecessor. In March 1979, the bank extended a $25,000 line of credit to the Reids’ painting business, which was the largest amount of credit the bank had extended to them. The agreement was documented in a note stating it was payable “On Demand” but also included specific conditions that would constitute default. The Reids relied on this credit line to finance their operations. In mid-May 1979, without prior warning, discussion, or any significant change in the Reids’ financial position, the bank’s loan officer informed Reid that it would make no further advances. The bank then began applying incoming payments directly to the loan balance, repossessed the Reids’ vehicles, and took other collection actions. As a result, the Reids’ business failed, and they lost their home and vehicles. The Reids sued, alleging, among other things, that the bank breached an implied covenant of good faith and fair dealing. A jury found for the Reids on this claim, and the bank appealed.
Court Holding & Legal Precedent
Issue: Does a lender breach the implied covenant of good faith and fair dealing by abruptly terminating a line of credit without notice when the underlying note is payable “on demand” but the overall context of the agreement indicates a continuing credit relationship?
Yes. The court affirmed the jury’s verdict, holding that the bank breached Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua. Ut enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exercitation ullamco laboris nisi ut aliquip ex ea commodo consequat. Duis aute irure dolor in reprehenderit in voluptate velit esse cillum dolore eu fugiat nulla pariatur. Exc
IRAC Legal Analysis
About IRAC analysis
IRAC (Issue, Rule, Analysis, Conclusion) is the structure professors expect in exam answers. Each LSD.Law brief states the issue, the governing rule with citations, the court's application of that rule, and the conclusion - the same reasoning pattern you will use on exams and in practice.
Legal Issue
Does a lender breach the implied covenant of good faith and fair dealing by abruptly terminating a line of credit without notice when the underlying note is payable “on demand” but the overall context of the agreement indicates a continuing credit relationship?
Conclusion
This case is a key precedent in lender liability, affirming that the Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua. Ut enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exercitation ullamco l
Legal Rule
Every contract or duty governed by the Uniform Commercial Code, including lender-borrower Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua. Ut enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exercitation ullamco laboris nisi ut aliquip ex ea commodo consequat. Duis aute irure dolor in reprehenderit in voluptate velit esse cillum dolore eu fugiat nulla pariatur. Excepteur
Legal Analysis
The court first established that Maine law, through its adoption of U.C.C. Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua. Ut enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exercitation ullamco laboris nisi ut aliquip ex ea commodo consequat. Duis aute irure dolor in reprehenderit in voluptate velit esse cillum dolore eu fugiat nulla pariatur. Excepteur sint occaecat cupidatat non proident, sunt in culpa qui officia deserunt mollit anim id est laborum. Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua. Ut enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exercitation ullamco laboris nisi ut aliquip ex ea commodo consequat. Duis aute irure dolor in reprehenderit in voluptate velit esse cillum dolore eu fugiat nulla pariatur. Excepteur sint occaecat cupidatat non proident, sunt in culpa qui officia deserunt mollit anim id est laborum. Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua. Ut enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exercitation ullamco laboris nisi ut aliquip ex ea commodo consequat. Duis aute irure dolor in reprehenderit in voluptate velit esse cillum dolore eu fugiat nulla pariatur. Excepteur sint occaecat cupidatat non proident, sunt in culpa qui officia deserunt mollit anim id est laborum. Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore
Flash-to-Full Case Opinions
Flash Summary
- Maine law recognizes an enforceable cause of action for breach of