McNAUGHTON v. CHARLESTON CHARTER SCHOOL Case Brief
Complete case briefs with LSD+
Every LSD.Law brief pairs a full IRAC analysis with opinion summaries at three levels of depth, written by a team of Harvard Law and MIT graduates - a quick synopsis when you are pressed for time, the complete reasoning when you need to go deep.
Adaptive Case Views
Toggle between Flash, Standard, and Expanded. Get what you need, when you need it.
Exam-Ready IRAC Format
We deliver the precise structure professors look for in exam answers.
Complex Cases, Clarified
We break down dense legal reasoning into something digestible, helping you grasp core concepts.
Case Brief Summary & Legal Analysis
tl;dr: A charter school fired a teacher mid-contract, citing a “contingent on funding” clause to reallocate her salary. The court found this was a breach and held the school liable for special damages because it knew the firing would prevent her from completing her teacher certification program.
Legal Significance: Establishes that a “contingent on funding” clause is not a license for discretionary reallocation of funds. It also clarifies that an employer’s knowledge of an employee’s special circumstances can create liability for foreseeable special damages beyond lost wages upon breach of an employment contract.
Case Facts & Court Holding
Key Facts & Case Background
Cynthia McNaughton was a participant in the Program of Alternative Certification for Educators (PACE), which required a full induction teaching year to become a certified teacher. She signed a one-year employment agreement with the Charleston Charter School for Math and Science (Appellant) for the 2010-2011 school year. The agreement contained a clause stating it was “contingent on funding and enrollment.” Appellant was aware of McNaughton’s participation in the PACE program at the time of hiring. Despite positive performance reviews, Appellant terminated McNaughton’s employment in December 2010, midway through the school year. The school’s principal stated the termination was necessary to reallocate funds from McNaughton’s salary to hire a new math teacher following poor student test scores. However, the principal conceded at trial that funding for McNaughton’s position was available at the time of termination but was repurposed. Evidence also showed other unused funds in the school’s budget. As a result of the mid-year termination, McNaughton was unable to find another qualifying teaching position, could not complete the PACE program, and suffered significant financial consequences, including foreclosure on her home and incurring additional student loan interest.
Court Holding & Legal Precedent
Issue: Did the school breach its employment contract and become liable for special damages when it terminated a teacher mid-year by invoking a “contingent on funding” clause to discretionarily reallocate her salary, knowing the termination would prevent her from completing a required certification program?
Yes. The school breached the employment contract because the “contingent on funding” Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua. Ut enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exercitation ullamco laboris nisi ut aliquip ex ea commodo consequat. Duis aute irure dolor in reprehenderit in voluptate velit esse cillum
IRAC Legal Analysis
About IRAC analysis
IRAC (Issue, Rule, Analysis, Conclusion) is the structure professors expect in exam answers. Each LSD.Law brief states the issue, the governing rule with citations, the court's application of that rule, and the conclusion - the same reasoning pattern you will use on exams and in practice.
Legal Issue
Did the school breach its employment contract and become liable for special damages when it terminated a teacher mid-year by invoking a “contingent on funding” clause to discretionarily reallocate her salary, knowing the termination would prevent her from completing a required certification program?
Conclusion
This case provides a significant precedent on the scope of consequential damages Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua. Ut enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exercitation ullamco laboris nisi ut aliquip ex ea commodo consequat. Duis aute irure dolor in reprehenderit in voluptate velit esse cillum dolore eu fugiat nulla
Legal Rule
Special damages for breach of contract are recoverable when such damages may Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua. Ut enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exercitation ullamco laboris nisi ut aliquip ex ea commodo consequat. Duis aute irure dolor in reprehenderit in voluptate velit esse cillum dolore
Legal Analysis
The Supreme Court of South Carolina affirmed the lower court's judgment, focusing Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua. Ut enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exercitation ullamco laboris nisi ut aliquip ex ea commodo consequat. Duis aute irure dolor in reprehenderit in voluptate velit esse cillum dolore eu fugiat nulla pariatur. Excepteur sint occaecat cupidatat non proident, sunt in culpa qui officia deserunt mollit anim id est laborum. Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua. Ut enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exercitation ullamco laboris nisi ut aliquip ex ea commodo consequat. Duis aute irure dolor in reprehenderit in voluptate velit esse cillum dolore eu fugiat nulla pariatur. Excepteur sint occaecat cupidatat non proident, sunt in culpa qui officia deserunt mollit anim id est laborum. Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua. Ut enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exercitation ullamco laboris nisi ut aliquip ex ea commodo consequat. Duis aute irure dolor in reprehenderit in voluptate velit esse cillum dolore eu fugiat nulla pariatur. Excepteur sint occaecat cupidatat non proident, sunt in culpa qui officia deserunt mollit anim id est laborum. Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua. Ut enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exercitation ullamco laboris nisi ut al
Flash-to-Full Case Opinions
Flash Summary
- A “contingent on funding” clause in an employment contract is breached