KENFORD CO. v. ERIE COUNTY Case Brief
Complete case briefs with LSD+
Every LSD.Law brief pairs a full IRAC analysis with opinion summaries at three levels of depth, written by a team of Harvard Law and MIT graduates - a quick synopsis when you are pressed for time, the complete reasoning when you need to go deep.
Adaptive Case Views
Toggle between Flash, Standard, and Expanded. Get what you need, when you need it.
Exam-Ready IRAC Format
We deliver the precise structure professors look for in exam answers.
Complex Cases, Clarified
We break down dense legal reasoning into something digestible, helping you grasp core concepts.
Case Brief Summary & Legal Analysis
tl;dr: A county breached a contract to build a domed stadium. The court denied the planned operator’s claim for 20 years of lost future profits, finding the damages were not contemplated by the parties and were too speculative to be proven with reasonable certainty for a new business.
Legal Significance: This case establishes a high bar for recovering lost profits for a new business, holding that even sophisticated economic projections may be insufficient to satisfy the requirements of reasonable certainty and that the damages must have been contemplated by the parties at the time of contracting.
KENFORD CO. v. ERIE COUNTY Law School Study Guide
Use this case brief structure for your own legal analysis. Focus on the IRAC methodology to excel in law school exams and cold calls.
Case Facts & Court Holding
Key Facts & Case Background
Erie County contracted with Kenford Co. and Dome Stadium, Inc. (DSI) for the construction and operation of a domed stadium. The contract stipulated that if the parties failed to agree on a 40-year lease, a pre-negotiated 20-year management contract would automatically take effect upon the stadium’s completion. The County failed to begin construction, thereby breaching the contract. Kenford and DSI sued for damages, including DSI’s loss of prospective profits over the 20-year term of the management contract. At trial, DSI presented extensive expert testimony using sophisticated economic modeling to project these profits. The model used historical data from other stadiums and a market analysis for the Buffalo area. The jury awarded DSI substantial damages for lost profits. The Appellate Division reversed this portion of the award, concluding the projections were insufficient as a matter of law. DSI appealed to the Court of Appeals of New York.
Court Holding & Legal Precedent
Issue: May a party recover damages for lost prospective profits over a 20-year contract term for a new entertainment venture that was never established, due to the other party’s breach of contract?
No. The plaintiff could not recover damages for lost prospective profits because Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua. Ut enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exe
IRAC Legal Analysis
About IRAC analysis
IRAC (Issue, Rule, Analysis, Conclusion) is the structure professors expect in exam answers. Each LSD.Law brief states the issue, the governing rule with citations, the court's application of that rule, and the conclusion - the same reasoning pattern you will use on exams and in practice.
Legal Issue
May a party recover damages for lost prospective profits over a 20-year contract term for a new entertainment venture that was never established, due to the other party’s breach of contract?
Conclusion
This case solidifies New York's stringent approach to awarding lost profits for Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua. Ut enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exercitation ullamco laboris
Legal Rule
To recover lost future profits for a breach of contract, a plaintiff Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua. Ut enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exercitation ullamco laboris nisi ut aliquip ex ea commodo consequat. Duis aute irure dolor in reprehenderit in voluptate velit esse cillum dolore eu fugiat nulla pariatur. Excepteur sint occaecat cupidatat non proident, sunt in culpa qui officia deserunt mollit anim id est laborum. Lorem ipsum dolo
Legal Analysis
The Court of Appeals affirmed the denial of lost profits on two Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua. Ut enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exercitation ullamco laboris nisi ut aliquip ex ea commodo consequat. Duis aute irure dolor in reprehenderit in voluptate velit esse cillum dolore eu fugiat nulla pariatur. Excepteur sint occaecat cupidatat non proident, sunt in culpa qui officia deserunt mollit anim id est laborum. Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua. Ut enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exercitation ullamco laboris nisi ut aliquip ex ea commodo consequat. Duis aute irure dolor in reprehenderit in voluptate velit esse cillum dolore eu fugiat nulla pariatur. Excepteur sint occaecat cupidatat non proident, sunt in culpa qui officia deserunt mollit anim id est laborum. Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua. Ut enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exercitation ullamco laboris nisi ut aliquip ex ea commodo consequat. Duis aute irure dolor in reprehenderit in voluptate velit esse cillum dolore eu fugiat nulla pariatur. Excepteur sint occaecat cupidatat non proident, sunt in culpa qui officia deserunt mollit anim id est laborum. Lorem ipsum dolor si
Flash-to-Full Case Opinions
Flash Summary
- To recover lost profits for breach of contract, damages must be