Grossman Holdings Ltd. v. Hourihan Case Brief
Complete case briefs with LSD+
Every LSD.Law brief pairs a full IRAC analysis with opinion summaries at three levels of depth, written by a team of Harvard Law and MIT graduates - a quick synopsis when you are pressed for time, the complete reasoning when you need to go deep.
Adaptive Case Views
Toggle between Flash, Standard, and Expanded. Get what you need, when you need it.
Exam-Ready IRAC Format
We deliver the precise structure professors look for in exam answers.
Complex Cases, Clarified
We break down dense legal reasoning into something digestible, helping you grasp core concepts.
Case Brief Summary & Legal Analysis
tl;dr: A builder constructed a house facing the wrong direction. The court held that the proper damages were not the cost to rebuild the entire house, but rather the diminution in the home’s value caused by the incorrect orientation, due to the principle of economic waste.
Legal Significance: This case formally adopted the Restatement (First) of Contracts § 346(1)(a) in Florida, establishing the “economic waste” doctrine as the standard for measuring damages in construction contract breaches, limiting recovery to diminution in value when repair costs are grossly disproportionate to the benefit.
Case Facts & Court Holding
Key Facts & Case Background
George and Katrina Hourihan contracted with Grossman Holdings Ltd. for the construction of a new house. The contract, architectural drawings, and model home all specified that the house would have a southeast exposure. The contract stipulated that the builder would construct the house “substantially the same” as the plans. During construction, Grossman displayed new drawings showing the Hourihans’ house as a mirror image of the original plan, with an incorrect orientation. The Hourihans immediately objected and demanded the house be built according to the original specifications. Grossman refused and completed the house with the incorrect orientation. The Hourihans sued for breach of contract. The trial court found a breach but refused to award damages, reasoning that rebuilding the house would constitute economic waste and that the property’s overall market value had increased since the contract date. The district court of appeal reversed, holding that the economic waste doctrine did not apply to residential construction and that the proper measure of damages was the cost to reconstruct the house.
Court Holding & Legal Precedent
Issue: When a construction contract is breached in a manner that would be grossly and disproportionately expensive to remedy, is the proper measure of damages the cost to cure the defect or the diminution in the property’s value caused by the defect?
The proper measure of damages is the diminution in value, not the Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua. Ut enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exercitation ullamco laboris nisi ut aliquip ex ea commodo consequat. Duis aute irure dolor in reprehenderit in voluptate velit esse cillum dolore eu fugiat nulla pariatur. Excepteur sint occaecat cupidatat non proident, sunt in culpa qui officia deserunt mollit anim id est laborum. Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua. Ut enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exercitation ullamco laboris nisi ut aliquip ex ea commodo con
IRAC Legal Analysis
About IRAC analysis
IRAC (Issue, Rule, Analysis, Conclusion) is the structure professors expect in exam answers. Each LSD.Law brief states the issue, the governing rule with citations, the court's application of that rule, and the conclusion - the same reasoning pattern you will use on exams and in practice.
Legal Issue
When a construction contract is breached in a manner that would be grossly and disproportionately expensive to remedy, is the proper measure of damages the cost to cure the defect or the diminution in the property’s value caused by the defect?
Conclusion
This decision establishes the economic waste doctrine as a key limitation on Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua. Ut enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exercitation ullamco laboris nisi
Legal Rule
For a breach of a construction contract involving defective or unfinished construction, Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua. Ut enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exercitation ullamco laboris nisi ut aliquip ex ea commodo consequat. Duis aute irure dolor in reprehenderit in voluptate velit esse cillum dolore eu fugiat nulla pariatur. Excepteur sint occaecat cupidatat non proident, sunt in culpa qui officia des
Legal Analysis
The Supreme Court of Florida resolved a conflict among its lower courts Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua. Ut enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exercitation ullamco laboris nisi ut aliquip ex ea commodo consequat. Duis aute irure dolor in reprehenderit in voluptate velit esse cillum dolore eu fugiat nulla pariatur. Excepteur sint occaecat cupidatat non proident, sunt in culpa qui officia deserunt mollit anim id est laborum. Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua. Ut enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exercitation ullamco laboris nisi ut aliquip ex ea commodo consequat. Duis aute irure dolor in reprehenderit in voluptate velit esse cillum dolore eu fugiat nulla pariatur. Excepteur sint occaecat cupidatat non proident, sunt in culpa qui officia deserunt mollit anim id est laborum. Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua. Ut enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exercitation ullamco laboris nisi ut aliquip ex ea commodo consequat. Duis aute irure dolor in reprehenderit in voluptate velit esse cillum dolore eu fugiat nulla pariatur. Excepteur sint occaecat cupidatat non proident, sunt in culpa qui officia deserunt mollit anim id est laborum. Lore
Flash-to-Full Case Opinions
Flash Summary
- For a construction contract breach, damages are the cost of repair