Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. United Airlines, Inc. Case Brief
Complete case briefs with LSD+
Every LSD.Law brief pairs a full IRAC analysis with opinion summaries at three levels of depth, written by a team of Harvard Law and MIT graduates - a quick synopsis when you are pressed for time, the complete reasoning when you need to go deep.
Adaptive Case Views
Toggle between Flash, Standard, and Expanded. Get what you need, when you need it.
Exam-Ready IRAC Format
We deliver the precise structure professors look for in exam answers.
Complex Cases, Clarified
We break down dense legal reasoning into something digestible, helping you grasp core concepts.
Case Brief Summary & Legal Analysis
tl;dr: The court held that the ADA requires an employer to reassign a qualified disabled employee to a vacant position, even if a more qualified candidate exists, overruling prior circuit precedent that permitted competitive hiring policies for such reassignments.
Legal Significance: This case established that the ADA’s ‘reassignment’ accommodation is a mandatory, non-competitive transfer for qualified disabled employees, absent undue hardship. It confirms the ADA can require preferential treatment to ensure equal opportunity, rejecting a narrower, anti-preference interpretation of the statute.
Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. United Airlines, Inc. Law School Study Guide
Use this case brief structure for your own legal analysis. Focus on the IRAC methodology to excel in law school exams and cold calls.
Case Facts & Court Holding
Key Facts & Case Background
United Airlines established a policy for employees who, due to disability, could no longer perform their current jobs. The policy stated that reassignment to a vacant position was a possible reasonable accommodation, but the process was competitive. A disabled employee seeking transfer was guaranteed an interview and given ‘priority consideration’ over a similarly qualified applicant, but was not automatically placed into the vacant position if a more qualified, non-disabled candidate applied. The Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC) filed suit, alleging this policy violated the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA). The EEOC contended that the ADA’s provision for ‘reassignment to a vacant position’ requires an employer to appoint a qualified disabled employee to the role, not merely allow them to compete for it. The district court dismissed the EEOC’s complaint based on binding Seventh Circuit precedent, EEOC v. Humiston-Keeling, which had permitted an employer to hire the ‘best applicant’ over a disabled employee seeking reassignment. The EEOC appealed, arguing that the Supreme Court’s intervening decision in U.S. Airways, Inc. v. Barnett invalidated the reasoning of Humiston-Keeling.
Court Holding & Legal Precedent
Issue: Does the Americans with Disabilities Act’s reasonable accommodation provision require an employer to reassign a qualified employee with a disability to a vacant position for which they are qualified, or may the employer fill the position with a more qualified applicant through a competitive hiring process?
Yes. The court held that the ADA requires an employer to appoint Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua. Ut enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exercitation ullamco laboris nisi ut aliquip ex ea commodo consequat. Duis aute irure dolor in reprehenderit in voluptate velit esse cillum dolore eu fugiat nulla par
IRAC Legal Analysis
About IRAC analysis
IRAC (Issue, Rule, Analysis, Conclusion) is the structure professors expect in exam answers. Each LSD.Law brief states the issue, the governing rule with citations, the court's application of that rule, and the conclusion - the same reasoning pattern you will use on exams and in practice.
Legal Issue
Does the Americans with Disabilities Act’s reasonable accommodation provision require an employer to reassign a qualified employee with a disability to a vacant position for which they are qualified, or may the employer fill the position with a more qualified applicant through a competitive hiring process?
Conclusion
This decision aligns the Seventh Circuit with other circuits holding that reassignment Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua. Ut enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exercitation ullamco labor
Legal Rule
Under the Americans with Disabilities Act, 'reassignment to a vacant position' is Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua. Ut enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exercitation ullamco laboris nisi ut aliquip ex ea commodo consequat. Duis aute irure dolor in reprehenderit in voluptate velit esse cillum dolore eu fugiat nulla pariatur. Excepteur sint occaecat cupidatat non proident, su
Legal Analysis
The court overruled its prior decision in *Humiston-Keeling*, which held that the Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua. Ut enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exercitation ullamco laboris nisi ut aliquip ex ea commodo consequat. Duis aute irure dolor in reprehenderit in voluptate velit esse cillum dolore eu fugiat nulla pariatur. Excepteur sint occaecat cupidatat non proident, sunt in culpa qui officia deserunt mollit anim id est laborum. Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua. Ut enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exercitation ullamco laboris nisi ut aliquip ex ea commodo consequat. Duis aute irure dolor in reprehenderit in voluptate velit esse cillum dolore eu fugiat nulla pariatur. Excepteur sint occaecat cupidatat non proident, sunt in culpa qui officia deserunt mollit anim id est laborum. Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua. Ut enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exercitation ullamco laboris nisi ut aliquip ex ea commodo consequat. Duis aute irure dolor in reprehenderit in voluptate velit esse cillum dolore eu fugiat nulla pariatur. Excepteur sint occaecat cupidatat non proident, sunt in culpa qui officia deserunt mollit anim id est laborum. Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua. Ut enim ad minim ven
Flash-to-Full Case Opinions
Flash Summary
- Overruling EEOC v. Humiston-Keeling, the court held the ADA requires employers