EarthInfo, Inc. v. Hydrosphere Resource Consultants, Inc. Case Brief
Complete case briefs with LSD+
Every LSD.Law brief pairs a full IRAC analysis with opinion summaries at three levels of depth, written by a team of Harvard Law and MIT graduates - a quick synopsis when you are pressed for time, the complete reasoning when you need to go deep.
Adaptive Case Views
Toggle between Flash, Standard, and Expanded. Get what you need, when you need it.
Exam-Ready IRAC Format
We deliver the precise structure professors look for in exam answers.
Complex Cases, Clarified
We break down dense legal reasoning into something digestible, helping you grasp core concepts.
Case Brief Summary & Legal Analysis
tl;dr: A software developer breached a contract by withholding royalties. The court permitted the non-breaching party to rescind the contract and recover the breacher’s profits, but required that those profits be apportioned to account for the breaching party’s own contributions to generating them.
Legal Significance: This case establishes that disgorgement of profits is an available restitutionary remedy for a conscious and substantial breach of contract, but equity requires apportioning those profits to credit the breaching party for its own efforts and investments, preventing unjust punishment.
Case Facts & Court Holding
Key Facts & Case Background
Hydrosphere Resource Consultants, Inc. (Hydrosphere) developed software products under contracts that were later assigned to EarthInfo, Inc. (EarthInfo). Under the agreements, EarthInfo was responsible for marketing, packaging, and distributing the products, while paying Hydrosphere ongoing royalties. A dispute arose over whether a new derivative product was subject to royalties. In response, EarthInfo unilaterally withheld all royalty payments on existing products, although it continued to pay fixed development fees. Hydrosphere sued for breach of contract. The trial court found EarthInfo’s withholding of royalties was a substantial breach, granted rescission of the contracts, and ordered EarthInfo to disgorge all net profits earned from the products after the date of the breach. The trial court credited EarthInfo for its acquisition costs and development fees paid after the breach but did not otherwise apportion the profits to account for EarthInfo’s marketing and other business contributions. The court of appeals affirmed, and the Supreme Court of Colorado granted certiorari.
Court Holding & Legal Precedent
Issue: When a contract is rescinded due to a substantial breach, may a court order the breaching party to disgorge all profits earned from the breach, or must those profits be apportioned to reflect the contributions of both the breaching and non-breaching parties?
Affirmed in part, reversed in part. The court held that disgorgement of Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua. Ut enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exercitation ullamco laboris nisi ut aliquip ex ea commodo consequat. Duis aute irure dolor in reprehenderit in voluptate velit ess
IRAC Legal Analysis
About IRAC analysis
IRAC (Issue, Rule, Analysis, Conclusion) is the structure professors expect in exam answers. Each LSD.Law brief states the issue, the governing rule with citations, the court's application of that rule, and the conclusion - the same reasoning pattern you will use on exams and in practice.
Legal Issue
When a contract is rescinded due to a substantial breach, may a court order the breaching party to disgorge all profits earned from the breach, or must those profits be apportioned to reflect the contributions of both the breaching and non-breaching parties?
Conclusion
The case establishes a nuanced framework in Colorado for awarding profits as Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua. Ut enim ad minim ven
Legal Rule
Disgorgement of profits may be awarded as a restitutionary remedy for a Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua. Ut enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exercitation ullamco laboris nisi ut aliquip ex ea commodo consequat. Duis aute irure dolor in reprehenderit in voluptate velit esse cillum dolore eu fugiat nulla pariatur. Excepteur sint o
Legal Analysis
The court navigated the conflict between contract law's focus on expectation damages Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua. Ut enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exercitation ullamco laboris nisi ut aliquip ex ea commodo consequat. Duis aute irure dolor in reprehenderit in voluptate velit esse cillum dolore eu fugiat nulla pariatur. Excepteur sint occaecat cupidatat non proident, sunt in culpa qui officia deserunt mollit anim id est laborum. Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua. Ut enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exercitation ullamco laboris nisi ut aliquip ex ea commodo consequat. Duis aute irure dolor in reprehenderit in voluptate velit esse cillum dolore eu fugiat nulla pariatur. Excepteur sint occaecat cupidatat non proident, sunt in culpa qui officia deserunt mollit anim id est laborum. Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua. Ut enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exercitation ullamco laboris nisi ut aliquip ex ea commodo consequat. Duis aute irure dolor in reprehenderit in voluptate velit esse cillum dolore eu fugiat nulla pariatur. Excepteur sint occaecat cupidatat non proident, sunt in culpa qui officia deserunt mollit anim id est laborum. Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor
Flash-to-Full Case Opinions
Flash Summary
- Disgorgement of profits is a permissible, but extraordinary, restitutionary remedy for