Case Citation
Legal Case Name

Carmichael v. Adirondack Bottled Gas Corp. Case Brief

Supreme Court of Vermont1993Docket #1076839
635 A.2d 1211 161 Vt. 200 1993 Vt. LEXIS 114 Contracts Civil Procedure Torts

Why Top Law Students (And Those Aspiring to Be) Use LSD+ Briefs

Let's be real, law school is a marathon. Our exclusive Flash-to-Full case system is designed by Harvard Law School and MIT grads to match your pace: Quick summaries when you're slammed, detailed analysis when you need to go deep. Only LSD+ offers this kind of flexibility to genuinely fit your study flow.

Adaptive Case Views

Toggle between Flash, Standard, and Expanded. Get what you need, when you need it.

Exam-Ready IRAC Format

We deliver the precise structure professors look for in exam answers.

Complex Cases, Clarified

We break down dense legal reasoning into something digestible, helping you grasp core concepts.

Case Brief Summary & Legal Analysis

General Brief
4 min read

tl;dr: A gas supplier was held liable for breaching the implied covenant of good faith and fair dealing after using a contract’s automatic termination clause, triggered by a business owner’s death, to pressure his grieving widow into selling the business cheaply.

Legal Significance: Establishes that the implied covenant of good faith and fair dealing extends beyond a contract’s formal termination to govern the parties’ conduct during the “winding down” phase, protecting the justified expectations arising from their prior relationship.

Carmichael v. Adirondack Bottled Gas Corp. Law School Study Guide

Use this case brief structure for your own legal analysis. Focus on the IRAC methodology to excel in law school exams and cold calls.

Case Facts & Court Holding

Key Facts & Case Background

Philip and Janet Carmichael operated a gas distributorship under a contract with defendant Adirondack Bottled Gas Corp. The agreement contained a “key man” clause, providing for automatic termination upon Philip Carmichael’s death. Six months before his death, the Carmichaels had rejected Adirondack’s offer to purchase the business for $38,500. When Philip died in an accident, the clause was triggered. Janet Carmichael, now a widow, informed Adirondack’s manager of her intent to continue the business, and he replied that they would discuss it later. Instead, Adirondack renewed its $38,500 offer and, on January 13, gave Carmichael’s attorney a five-day deadline to accept. On January 15, when Carmichael reiterated her desire to stay in business, Adirondack’s attorney told her, “no matter what… I was out of business Monday at noon.” Believing her fuel supply was cut off, Carmichael laid off her employees and sold business assets to a competitor. Adirondack’s conduct occurred while Carmichael was under the duress of her husband’s recent death. She sued for breach of the implied covenant of good faith and fair dealing, and a jury found in her favor.

Court Holding & Legal Precedent

Issue: Does the implied covenant of good faith and fair dealing extend to a party’s conduct after a contract has been automatically terminated by its own terms, particularly during the winding down of the business relationship?

Yes. The court affirmed the jury verdict for Carmichael, holding that Adirondack Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua. Ut enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exercitation ullamco laboris nisi ut aliquip ex ea comm

Master Every Case Faster

Unlock premium legal analysis that helps you quickly understand complex cases, designed by Harvard Law and MIT graduates. It's about working smarter, not just harder.

Start 14-Day Free Trial

Thousands of students are already saving time and gaining clarity. Why not you?

IRAC Legal Analysis

Premium Feature Unlock

Complete IRAC Analysis for Higher Grades

IRAC (Issue, Rule, Analysis, Conclusion) is the exact format professors want to see in your exam answers. Our exclusive Flash-to-Full briefs combine holding, analysis, and rule statements formatted to match what A+ students produce in exams. These structured briefs help reinforce the essential legal reasoning patterns expected in law school.

Legal Issue

Does the implied covenant of good faith and fair dealing extend to a party’s conduct after a contract has been automatically terminated by its own terms, particularly during the winding down of the business relationship?

Conclusion

This case solidifies the principle that the duty of good faith is Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua. Ut enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exercitation ullamco laboris nisi ut aliquip ex ea commodo con

Legal Rule

The implied covenant of good faith and fair dealing, which exists in Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua. Ut enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exercitation ullamco laboris nisi ut aliquip ex ea commodo consequat. Duis aute irure dolor in reprehenderit in voluptate velit esse cillum dolore eu fugiat nulla pariatur. Excepteur sint occaecat cupidatat non proident, sunt in culpa qui o

Legal Analysis

The court rejected Adirondack's argument that its duty of good faith expired Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua. Ut enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exercitation ullamco laboris nisi ut aliquip ex ea commodo consequat. Duis aute irure dolor in reprehenderit in voluptate velit esse cillum dolore eu fugiat nulla pariatur. Excepteur sint occaecat cupidatat non proident, sunt in culpa qui officia deserunt mollit anim id est laborum. Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua. Ut enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exercitation ullamco laboris nisi ut aliquip ex ea commodo consequat. Duis aute irure dolor in reprehenderit in voluptate velit esse cillum dolore eu fugiat nulla pariatur. Excepteur sint occaecat cupidatat non proident, sunt in culpa qui officia deserunt mollit anim id est laborum. Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua. Ut enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exercitation ullamco laboris nisi ut aliquip ex ea commodo consequat. Duis aute irure dolor in reprehenderit in voluptate velit esse cillum dolore eu fugiat nulla pariatur. Excepteur sint occaecat cupidatat non proident, sunt in culpa qui officia deserunt mollit anim id est laborum. Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua. Ut enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exercitation ullamco laboris nisi ut aliquip ex ea commodo consequat. Duis aute irure dolor in reprehenderit in vo

Flash-to-Full Case Opinions

Flash Summary

  • The implied covenant of good faith and fair dealing survives contract
Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua. Ut enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exercitation ullamco laboris nisi ut aliquip ex ea commodo consequat. Duis aute irure dolor in reprehenderit in voluptate velit esse cillum dolore eu fugiat nulla pariatur. Excepteur sint occaecat cupidatat non proident, sunt in

Master Every Case Faster

Unlock premium legal analysis that helps you quickly understand complex cases, designed by Harvard Law and MIT graduates. It's about working smarter, not just harder.

Start 14-Day Free Trial

Thousands of students are already saving time and gaining clarity. Why not you?