BLOSSOM FARM v. KASSON CHEESE Case Brief
Complete case briefs with LSD+
Every LSD.Law brief pairs a full IRAC analysis with opinion summaries at three levels of depth, written by a team of Harvard Law and MIT graduates - a quick synopsis when you are pressed for time, the complete reasoning when you need to go deep.
Adaptive Case Views
Toggle between Flash, Standard, and Expanded. Get what you need, when you need it.
Exam-Ready IRAC Format
We deliver the precise structure professors look for in exam answers.
Complex Cases, Clarified
We break down dense legal reasoning into something digestible, helping you grasp core concepts.
Case Brief Summary & Legal Analysis
tl;dr: A seller sued a buyer for non-payment for a cheese-making ingredient. The court refused to enforce the contract, finding that the seller knew the buyer was using the ingredient to illegally misbrand its cheese, making enforcement of the contract contrary to public policy.
Legal Significance: This case illustrates that a facially legal contract is unenforceable on public policy grounds if the promisee knowingly facilitates the promisor’s improper or illegal use of the subject matter, adopting the framework of the Restatement (Second) of Contracts §§ 178 and 182.
BLOSSOM FARM v. KASSON CHEESE Law School Study Guide
Use this case brief structure for your own legal analysis. Focus on the IRAC methodology to excel in law school exams and cold calls.
Case Facts & Court Holding
Key Facts & Case Background
Blossom Farm Products Company (Blossom) was the sole U.S. distributor of Isokappacase, a product labeled as a “starter media” for cheese but composed primarily of casein, making it an effective yield enhancer. Blossom sold large quantities of Isokappacase to Kasson Cheese Company, Inc. (Kasson) on an open-account contract. Kasson used the product as a yield enhancer but did not label its final product as “imitation cheese” as required by federal and state food identity standards, instead selling it as real cheese. Blossom sued Kasson for $138,306 owed on the final shipment. Evidence showed that Blossom knew Kasson was using Isokappacase as a yield enhancer due to the massive volume of its orders—approximately 100 times more than would be needed for its stated purpose as a starter media. The manufacturer of Isokappacase had informed Blossom’s salesman that Kasson’s use would create a non-conforming product and that Kasson must be mislabeling it to remain economically viable. Despite this knowledge, Blossom continued to supply Kasson, as both parties benefited financially from the arrangement. The trial court found the contract illegal and unenforceable.
Court Holding & Legal Precedent
Issue: Is a contract for the sale of goods unenforceable on public policy grounds where the seller knows the buyer intends to use the goods for an improper purpose that violates food labeling laws and facilitates that purpose by continuing to supply the goods?
Yes, the contract is unenforceable. Although the contract for the sale of Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua. Ut enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exercitation ullamco laboris nisi ut aliquip ex e
IRAC Legal Analysis
About IRAC analysis
IRAC (Issue, Rule, Analysis, Conclusion) is the structure professors expect in exam answers. Each LSD.Law brief states the issue, the governing rule with citations, the court's application of that rule, and the conclusion - the same reasoning pattern you will use on exams and in practice.
Legal Issue
Is a contract for the sale of goods unenforceable on public policy grounds where the seller knows the buyer intends to use the goods for an improper purpose that violates food labeling laws and facilitates that purpose by continuing to supply the goods?
Conclusion
This case establishes that a party's knowledge of and facilitation of another's Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua. Ut enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exercitation ullamco laboris nisi ut aliquip
Legal Rule
If a promisee has substantially performed, enforcement is not precluded due to Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua. Ut enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exercitation ullamco laboris nisi ut aliquip ex ea commodo consequat. Duis aute irure dolor in reprehenderit in voluptate velit esse cillum dolore eu fugiat nulla pariatur. Excepteur sint occaecat cupidatat non proident, sunt in culpa qui officia deserunt mollit anim
Legal Analysis
The court adopted the framework of the Restatement (Second) of Contracts, focusing Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua. Ut enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exercitation ullamco laboris nisi ut aliquip ex ea commodo consequat. Duis aute irure dolor in reprehenderit in voluptate velit esse cillum dolore eu fugiat nulla pariatur. Excepteur sint occaecat cupidatat non proident, sunt in culpa qui officia deserunt mollit anim id est laborum. Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua. Ut enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exercitation ullamco laboris nisi ut aliquip ex ea commodo consequat. Duis aute irure dolor in reprehenderit in voluptate velit esse cillum dolore eu fugiat nulla pariatur. Excepteur sint occaecat cupidatat non proident, sunt in culpa qui officia deserunt mollit anim id est laborum. Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua. Ut enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exercitation ullamco laboris nisi ut aliquip ex ea commodo consequat. Duis aute irure dolor in reprehenderit in voluptate velit esse cillum dolore eu fugiat nulla pariatur. Excepteur sint occaecat cupidatat non proident, sunt in culpa qui officia deserunt mollit anim id est laborum. Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua. Ut enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exercitation ullamco laboris nisi ut aliquip ex ea
Flash-to-Full Case Opinions
Flash Summary
- A contract for a legal product is unenforceable on public policy