Austin Instrument, Inc. v. Loral Corp. Case Brief
Why Top Law Students (And Those Aspiring to Be) Use LSD+ Briefs
Let's be real, law school is a marathon. Our exclusive Flash-to-Full case system is designed by Harvard Law School and MIT grads to match your pace: Quick summaries when you're slammed, detailed analysis when you need to go deep. Only LSD+ offers this kind of flexibility to genuinely fit your study flow.
Adaptive Case Views
Toggle between Flash, Standard, and Expanded. Get what you need, when you need it.
Exam-Ready IRAC Format
We deliver the precise structure professors look for in exam answers.
Complex Cases, Clarified
We break down dense legal reasoning into something digestible, helping you grasp core concepts.
Case Brief Summary & Legal Analysis
tl;dr: A subcontractor threatened to halt delivery of critical parts for a time-sensitive government contract unless the contractor agreed to a price increase. The court found this was economic duress, rendering the contract modification voidable because the contractor had no reasonable alternative.
Legal Significance: This case establishes the modern test for economic duress in New York, clarifying that a threat to breach a contract is wrongful and constitutes duress when the threatened party cannot obtain the goods elsewhere and the ordinary remedy for breach of contract is inadequate.
Austin Instrument, Inc. v. Loral Corp. Law School Study Guide
Use this case brief structure for your own legal analysis. Focus on the IRAC methodology to excel in law school exams and cold calls.
Case Facts & Court Holding
Key Facts & Case Background
Loral Corporation held a lucrative, time-sensitive contract with the U.S. Navy to produce radar sets, which included a liquidated damages clause for late deliveries. Loral awarded a subcontract to Austin Instrument, Inc. for 23 essential precision gear components. Subsequently, when Loral was awarded a second Navy contract, it solicited new bids. Austin threatened to cease all deliveries under the first subcontract unless Loral agreed to a substantial price increase on the first contract and awarded Austin the entire subcontract for all 40 parts required for the second Navy contract. After Austin stopped its deliveries, Loral frantically searched for an alternative supplier among its ten approved vendors but found none that could produce the highly specialized parts in time to meet its strict delivery schedule with the Navy. Facing the threat of substantial liquidated damages and reputational harm with the government, Loral capitulated in writing, stating it had “no choice or alternative.” After Austin made its final delivery, Loral sued to recover the increased payments, arguing they were made under economic duress.
Court Holding & Legal Precedent
Issue: Did a subcontractor’s threat to withhold delivery of essential goods under an existing contract, unless the other party agreed to a price increase and a new contract, constitute economic duress that rendered the resulting contract modification voidable?
Yes. The court held that Austin’s actions constituted economic duress as a Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua. Ut enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exercitation ullamco laboris nisi ut aliquip ex ea commodo consequat. Duis aute irure dolor in reprehenderit in voluptate velit esse cillum dolore eu fugiat nulla pariatur. Excepteur sint occaecat cupidatat non proident, sunt in culpa qui officia deserunt mollit anim id est laborum. Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna al
IRAC Legal Analysis
Complete IRAC Analysis for Higher Grades
IRAC (Issue, Rule, Analysis, Conclusion) is the exact format professors want to see in your exam answers. Our exclusive Flash-to-Full briefs combine holding, analysis, and rule statements formatted to match what A+ students produce in exams. These structured briefs help reinforce the essential legal reasoning patterns expected in law school.
Legal Issue
Did a subcontractor’s threat to withhold delivery of essential goods under an existing contract, unless the other party agreed to a price increase and a new contract, constitute economic duress that rendered the resulting contract modification voidable?
Conclusion
This case provides a definitive framework for the doctrine of economic duress, Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua. Ut enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exercitation ullamco laboris nisi ut aliquip ex ea commodo consequat. Duis aute irure dolor in reprehenderit in voluptate velit esse cillum do
Legal Rule
A contract is voidable on the ground of economic duress where a Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua. Ut enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exercitation ullamco laboris nisi ut aliquip ex ea commodo consequat. Duis aute irure dolor in reprehenderit in voluptate velit esse cillum dolore eu fugiat nulla pari
Legal Analysis
The New York Court of Appeals determined that the evidence established a Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua. Ut enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exercitation ullamco laboris nisi ut aliquip ex ea commodo consequat. Duis aute irure dolor in reprehenderit in voluptate velit esse cillum dolore eu fugiat nulla pariatur. Excepteur sint occaecat cupidatat non proident, sunt in culpa qui officia deserunt mollit anim id est laborum. Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua. Ut enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exercitation ullamco laboris nisi ut aliquip ex ea commodo consequat. Duis aute irure dolor in reprehenderit in voluptate velit esse cillum dolore eu fugiat nulla pariatur. Excepteur sint occaecat cupidatat non proident, sunt in culpa qui officia deserunt mollit anim id est laborum. Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua. Ut enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exercitation ullamco laboris nisi ut aliquip ex ea commodo consequat. Duis aute irure dolor in reprehenderit in voluptate velit esse cillum dolore eu fugiat nulla pariatur. Excepteur sint occaecat cupidatat non proident, sunt in culpa qu
Flash-to-Full Case Opinions
Flash Summary
- A contract is voidable for economic duress when a party is