VMG SALSOUL, LLC v. CICCONE Case Brief
Complete case briefs with LSD+
Every LSD.Law brief pairs a full IRAC analysis with opinion summaries at three levels of depth, written by a team of Harvard Law and MIT graduates - a quick synopsis when you are pressed for time, the complete reasoning when you need to go deep.
Adaptive Case Views
Toggle between Flash, Standard, and Expanded. Get what you need, when you need it.
Exam-Ready IRAC Format
We deliver the precise structure professors look for in exam answers.
Complex Cases, Clarified
We break down dense legal reasoning into something digestible, helping you grasp core concepts.
Case Brief Summary & Legal Analysis
tl;dr: The Ninth Circuit held that a 0.23-second horn sample in Madonna’s song “Vogue” was a de minimis use, not copyright infringement. The court created a circuit split by ruling that the de minimis defense applies to sound recording sampling, rejecting a stricter, bright-line rule.
Legal Significance: This case established that the traditional de minimis copying defense applies to copyright infringement claims for sound recordings in the Ninth Circuit. It created a circuit split by explicitly rejecting the Sixth Circuit’s bright-line rule in Bridgeport Music that any unauthorized sampling is per se infringement.
Case Facts & Court Holding
Key Facts & Case Background
Plaintiff VMG Salsoul, LLC (VMG) owned the copyrights to the musical composition and sound recording of the song “Love Break.” VMG alleged that producer Shep Pettibone, while creating the song “Vogue” for Madonna, digitally sampled a 0.23-second, four-note horn chord from “Love Break.” For the purposes of summary judgment, the court assumed that this sampling, or actual copying, occurred. The sampled horn hit was then modified for its use in “Vogue”: it was transposed to a different key, truncated to make it “punchier,” and layered with other sounds and effects. This modified sample appeared only a handful of times in “Vogue,” where it was integrated with numerous other instrumental tracks. VMG sued Madonna, Pettibone, and others for infringement of both its composition and sound recording copyrights. The district court granted summary judgment to the defendants, finding any copying was de minimis.
Court Holding & Legal Precedent
Issue: Does the de minimis copying defense, which requires that a taking be substantial enough for an ordinary audience to recognize the appropriation, apply to copyright infringement claims involving the digital sampling of a sound recording?
Yes. The court affirmed summary judgment for the defendants, holding that the Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua. Ut enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exercitation ullamco laboris nisi
IRAC Legal Analysis
About IRAC analysis
IRAC (Issue, Rule, Analysis, Conclusion) is the structure professors expect in exam answers. Each LSD.Law brief states the issue, the governing rule with citations, the court's application of that rule, and the conclusion - the same reasoning pattern you will use on exams and in practice.
Legal Issue
Does the de minimis copying defense, which requires that a taking be substantial enough for an ordinary audience to recognize the appropriation, apply to copyright infringement claims involving the digital sampling of a sound recording?
Conclusion
This decision solidifies the de minimis defense for sound recording sampling within Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua. Ut enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud
Legal Rule
The de minimis use defense applies to copyright infringement claims for both Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua. Ut enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exercitation ullamco laboris nisi ut aliquip ex ea commodo consequat. Duis aute irure dolor in reprehenderit in vo
Legal Analysis
The Ninth Circuit first determined that the alleged copying was de minimis Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua. Ut enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exercitation ullamco laboris nisi ut aliquip ex ea commodo consequat. Duis aute irure dolor in reprehenderit in voluptate velit esse cillum dolore eu fugiat nulla pariatur. Excepteur sint occaecat cupidatat non proident, sunt in culpa qui officia deserunt mollit anim id est laborum. Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua. Ut enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exercitation ullamco laboris nisi ut aliquip ex ea commodo consequat. Duis aute irure dolor in reprehenderit in voluptate velit esse cillum dolore eu fugiat nulla pariatur. Excepteur sint occaecat cupidatat non proident, sunt in culpa qui officia deserunt mollit anim id est laborum. Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua. Ut enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exercitation ullamco laboris nisi ut aliquip ex ea commodo consequat. Duis aute irure dolor in reprehenderit in voluptate velit esse cillum dolore eu fugiat nulla pariatur. Excepteur sint occaecat cupidatat non proident, sunt in culpa qui officia deserunt mollit anim id est laborum. Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor inc
Flash-to-Full Case Opinions
Flash Summary
- The de minimis copying defense applies to copyright infringement claims for