UNITED STATES v. LOCKE Case Brief
Complete case briefs with LSD+
Every LSD.Law brief pairs a full IRAC analysis with opinion summaries at three levels of depth, written by a team of Harvard Law and MIT graduates - a quick synopsis when you are pressed for time, the complete reasoning when you need to go deep.
Adaptive Case Views
Toggle between Flash, Standard, and Expanded. Get what you need, when you need it.
Exam-Ready IRAC Format
We deliver the precise structure professors look for in exam answers.
Complex Cases, Clarified
We break down dense legal reasoning into something digestible, helping you grasp core concepts.
Case Brief Summary & Legal Analysis
tl;dr: The Supreme Court held that federal law preempts Washington state regulations governing oil tanker operations, training, and reporting. The Court found these areas were either within a field Congress intended to occupy exclusively or conflicted with the federal goal of uniform maritime regulation.
Legal Significance: This case clarifies the framework for federal preemption in maritime commerce, distinguishing between conflict preemption under Title I of the PWSA (allowing state rules for local peculiarities) and field preemption under Title II (reserving areas like vessel design, manning, and operation for exclusive federal control).
UNITED STATES v. LOCKE Law School Study Guide
Use this case brief structure for your own legal analysis. Focus on the IRAC methodology to excel in law school exams and cold calls.
Case Facts & Court Holding
Key Facts & Case Background
Following the Exxon Valdez oil spill, the State of Washington enacted comprehensive regulations establishing “best achievable protection” (BAP) standards for oil tankers operating in its waters. These regulations covered a wide range of topics, including crew training, English language proficiency, navigation watch procedures, and casualty reporting. The International Association of Independent Tanker Owners (Intertanko) challenged the regulations, arguing they were preempted by a comprehensive federal statutory and regulatory scheme, primarily the Ports and Waterways Safety Act (PWSA), as amended by the Oil Pollution Act of 1990 (OPA). Intertanko contended that the state rules undermined the need for national uniformity in maritime commerce. The United States intervened on behalf of Intertanko. The Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals upheld most of the regulations, reasoning that OPA’s saving clauses had narrowed the preemptive scope of the PWSA as interpreted in Ray v. Atlantic Richfield Co. The Supreme Court granted certiorari to resolve the preemption question under the Supremacy Clause.
Court Holding & Legal Precedent
Issue: Does the federal Ports and Waterways Safety Act, as amended by the Oil Pollution Act of 1990, preempt Washington state regulations governing oil tanker design, equipment, reporting, and operations?
Yes. The Court reversed the Ninth Circuit, holding that several of Washington’s Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua. Ut enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exercitation ullamco laboris nisi ut aliquip ex ea commodo consequat. Duis aute irure dolor in reprehenderit in voluptate velit esse cillum dolore eu fugiat nulla pariatur. Excepteur sint occaecat cupidatat non proident, sunt in culpa qui officia
IRAC Legal Analysis
About IRAC analysis
IRAC (Issue, Rule, Analysis, Conclusion) is the structure professors expect in exam answers. Each LSD.Law brief states the issue, the governing rule with citations, the court's application of that rule, and the conclusion - the same reasoning pattern you will use on exams and in practice.
Legal Issue
Does the federal Ports and Waterways Safety Act, as amended by the Oil Pollution Act of 1990, preempt Washington state regulations governing oil tanker design, equipment, reporting, and operations?
Conclusion
The case solidifies the *Ray* framework for maritime preemption, emphasizing the strong Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua. Ut enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exercitation ullamco laboris nisi ut aliquip ex ea commodo consequat. Duis aute irure dolor in reprehe
Legal Rule
Under the Supremacy Clause, federal law may preempt state law through either Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua. Ut enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exercitation ullamco laboris nisi ut aliquip ex ea commodo consequat. Duis aute irure dolor in reprehenderit in voluptate velit esse cillum dolore eu fugiat nulla pariatur. Excepteur sint occaecat cupidatat non proident, sunt in culpa qui officia deserunt mollit anim id est laborum.
Legal Analysis
Justice Kennedy, writing for a unanimous Court, reaffirmed the preemption framework from Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua. Ut enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exercitation ullamco laboris nisi ut aliquip ex ea commodo consequat. Duis aute irure dolor in reprehenderit in voluptate velit esse cillum dolore eu fugiat nulla pariatur. Excepteur sint occaecat cupidatat non proident, sunt in culpa qui officia deserunt mollit anim id est laborum. Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua. Ut enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exercitation ullamco laboris nisi ut aliquip ex ea commodo consequat. Duis aute irure dolor in reprehenderit in voluptate velit esse cillum dolore eu fugiat nulla pariatur. Excepteur sint occaecat cupidatat non proident, sunt in culpa qui officia deserunt mollit anim id est laborum. Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua. Ut enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exercitation ullamco laboris nisi ut aliquip ex ea commodo consequat. Duis aute irure dolor in reprehenderit in voluptate velit esse cillum dolore eu fugiat nulla pariatur. Excepteur sint occaecat cupidatat non proident, sunt in culpa qui officia deserunt mollit anim id est laborum. Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua. Ut enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exercitation ullamco laboris nisi ut aliquip ex ea commodo consequat. Duis aute irure dolor in reprehenderit in voluptate velit esse cillum dolore eu fugiat nulla pariatur. Excepteur sint occaecat cupidatat non proident, sunt in culpa qui officia deserunt mollit anim id est laborum. Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do ei
Flash-to-Full Case Opinions
Flash Summary
- Federal law preempts state regulations governing oil tanker design, operation, and