UNITED AIRLINES, INC. v. GOOD TASTE, INC. Case Brief
Complete case briefs with LSD+
Every LSD.Law brief pairs a full IRAC analysis with opinion summaries at three levels of depth, written by a team of Harvard Law and MIT graduates - a quick synopsis when you are pressed for time, the complete reasoning when you need to go deep.
Adaptive Case Views
Toggle between Flash, Standard, and Expanded. Get what you need, when you need it.
Exam-Ready IRAC Format
We deliver the precise structure professors look for in exam answers.
Complex Cases, Clarified
We break down dense legal reasoning into something digestible, helping you grasp core concepts.
Case Brief Summary & Legal Analysis
tl;dr: The Alaska Supreme Court, applying Illinois law, held that an unambiguous at-will contract termination clause allows termination without cause, and the implied covenant of good faith and fair dealing does not impose a requirement for a legitimate business reason for such termination.
Legal Significance: This case clarifies that under Illinois law, an express at-will termination clause generally permits termination for any reason, and the implied covenant of good faith cannot be used to override or contradict this explicit contractual right by imposing a good cause requirement.
Case Facts & Court Holding
Key Facts & Case Background
United Airlines (United) entered into a three-year catering agreement with Saucy Sisters Catering (Saucy Sisters). The agreement contained a clause allowing either party to terminate the contract with ninety days’ written notice. United terminated the contract pursuant to this clause. Saucy Sisters sued, alleging fraud, breach of contract, and breach of the implied covenant of good faith and fair dealing. The parties agreed Illinois law governed. The trial court dismissed the breach of contract claim, finding the termination clause unambiguous and permitting termination without cause. However, it allowed the implied covenant claim to proceed to trial, ruling that the covenant required United to exercise its termination discretion in a manner consistent with the parties’ reasonable expectations. The jury found no fraud but found United breached the implied covenant, awarding Saucy Sisters damages. United appealed the denial of its summary judgment motion on the implied covenant claim.
Court Holding & Legal Precedent
Issue: Under Illinois law, does the implied covenant of good faith and fair dealing prevent a party from exercising an unambiguous contractual right to terminate an agreement at will without a legitimate business reason?
Reversed. The trial court erred in denying United’s motion for summary judgment Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua. Ut enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exercitation ullamco laboris nisi ut aliquip ex ea commodo consequat. Duis aute irure dolor in reprehenderit in voluptate velit esse cillum dolore eu fugiat nulla pariatur. Excepteur sint occaecat cupidatat non proident, sunt in culpa qui offic
IRAC Legal Analysis
About IRAC analysis
IRAC (Issue, Rule, Analysis, Conclusion) is the structure professors expect in exam answers. Each LSD.Law brief states the issue, the governing rule with citations, the court's application of that rule, and the conclusion - the same reasoning pattern you will use on exams and in practice.
Legal Issue
Under Illinois law, does the implied covenant of good faith and fair dealing prevent a party from exercising an unambiguous contractual right to terminate an agreement at will without a legitimate business reason?
Conclusion
This case reinforces the principle under Illinois law that an unambiguous at-will Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua. Ut enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exercitation ullamco laboris nisi ut aliquip ex ea commodo consequat. Duis aute irure dolor
Legal Rule
Under Illinois law, where a contract contains an express and unambiguous at-will Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua. Ut enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exercitation ullamco laboris nisi ut aliquip ex ea commodo consequat. Duis aute irure dolor in reprehenderit in voluptate velit esse cillum dolore eu fugiat nulla pariatur. Excepteur sint occaecat cupidatat non proident, sunt in culpa qui officia deserunt mollit anim id est laborum. L
Legal Analysis
The Alaska Supreme Court, interpreting Illinois law, determined that the implied covenant Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua. Ut enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exercitation ullamco laboris nisi ut aliquip ex ea commodo consequat. Duis aute irure dolor in reprehenderit in voluptate velit esse cillum dolore eu fugiat nulla pariatur. Excepteur sint occaecat cupidatat non proident, sunt in culpa qui officia deserunt mollit anim id est laborum. Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua. Ut enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exercitation ullamco laboris nisi ut aliquip ex ea commodo consequat. Duis aute irure dolor in reprehenderit in voluptate velit esse cillum dolore eu fugiat nulla pariatur. Excepteur sint occaecat cupidatat non proident, sunt in culpa qui officia deserunt mollit anim id est laborum. Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua. Ut enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exercitation ullamco laboris nisi ut aliquip ex ea commodo consequat. Duis aute irure dolor in reprehenderit in voluptate velit esse cillum dolore eu fugiat nulla pariatur. Excepteur sint occaecat cupidatat non proident, sunt in culpa qui officia deserunt mollit anim id est laborum. Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore m
Flash-to-Full Case Opinions
Flash Summary
- Under Illinois law, the implied covenant of good faith and fair