U.S. v. GREAT LAKES DREDGE & DOCK COMPANY Case Brief
Complete case briefs with LSD+
Every LSD.Law brief pairs a full IRAC analysis with opinion summaries at three levels of depth, written by a team of Harvard Law and MIT graduates - a quick synopsis when you are pressed for time, the complete reasoning when you need to go deep.
Adaptive Case Views
Toggle between Flash, Standard, and Expanded. Get what you need, when you need it.
Exam-Ready IRAC Format
We deliver the precise structure professors look for in exam answers.
Complex Cases, Clarified
We break down dense legal reasoning into something digestible, helping you grasp core concepts.
Case Brief Summary & Legal Analysis
tl;dr: A dredging company was held strictly liable under the National Marine Sanctuaries Act for environmental damage caused by its subcontractor. The court affirmed liability but remanded for a redetermination of the appropriate restoration plan after finding the lower court made clear factual errors regarding recovery time.
Legal Significance: This case establishes that the National Marine Sanctuaries Act’s strict liability extends to employers for their independent contractors’ actions, narrowly construes the third-party defense, and validates the use of Habitat Equivalency Analysis (HEA) for calculating compensatory restoration damages under the Act.
U.S. v. GREAT LAKES DREDGE & DOCK COMPANY Law School Study Guide
Use this case brief structure for your own legal analysis. Focus on the IRAC methodology to excel in law school exams and cold calls.
Case Facts & Court Holding
Key Facts & Case Background
Defendant Great Lakes Dredge & Dock Company (Great Lakes) hired Coastal Marine Towing (Coastal) to tow dredge pipes through the Florida Keys National Marine Sanctuary. Great Lakes was responsible for preparing the pipe rafts and assisting with navigation. Due to a navigational error by a Coastal tug, another tug, the Captain Joe, ran aground. Great Lakes’ own assist tug, the Cavalier State, was tied to the Captain Joe and participated in efforts to free it. The grounding and extrication destroyed approximately 7,500 square meters of the sea bottom, including protected seagrass and coral, creating a large “blowhole.” The United States, on behalf of NOAA, sued Great Lakes under the National Marine Sanctuaries Act (NMSA) for response costs and damages for injury to sanctuary resources. The government’s damage model included a primary restoration plan to repair the grounding site and a compensatory restoration plan for the interim lost use of the resources, using a Habitat Equivalency Analysis (HEA) to quantify the latter. The district court found Great Lakes strictly liable but rejected the government’s primary restoration plan in favor of a “no action” alternative, while awarding compensatory damages based on the HEA. Both parties appealed.
Court Holding & Legal Precedent
Issue: Is a company that hires an independent contractor strictly liable under the National Marine Sanctuaries Act for environmental damage caused in part by the contractor, and is the Habitat Equivalency Analysis a valid scientific method for calculating compensatory restoration damages under the Act?
Yes. The court affirmed that Great Lakes was strictly liable for the Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua. Ut enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exercitation ullamco laboris nisi ut aliquip ex ea commodo consequat. Duis aute irure dolor in reprehenderit in voluptate velit esse cillum dolore eu fugiat nulla pariatur. Excepteur sint occaecat cupidatat non proident, sunt in culpa qui officia deserunt mollit anim id est laborum. Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua. Ut enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exercitation ullamco laboris nisi ut aliquip ex ea commodo c
IRAC Legal Analysis
About IRAC analysis
IRAC (Issue, Rule, Analysis, Conclusion) is the structure professors expect in exam answers. Each LSD.Law brief states the issue, the governing rule with citations, the court's application of that rule, and the conclusion - the same reasoning pattern you will use on exams and in practice.
Legal Issue
Is a company that hires an independent contractor strictly liable under the National Marine Sanctuaries Act for environmental damage caused in part by the contractor, and is the Habitat Equivalency Analysis a valid scientific method for calculating compensatory restoration damages under the Act?
Conclusion
This decision establishes a broad application of strict liability under the NMSA, Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua. Ut enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exercitation ullamco laboris nisi ut aliquip ex ea commodo consequat. Duis aute irure dolor in reprehenderit in voluptate velit
Legal Rule
The National Marine Sanctuaries Act (NMSA) imposes strict liability on "any person Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua. Ut enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exercitation ullamco laboris nisi ut aliquip ex ea commodo consequat. Duis aute irure dolor in reprehenderit in voluptate velit esse cillum dolore eu fugiat nulla pariatur. Excepteur sint occaecat cupidatat non proident, sunt in culpa qui officia deserunt mollit anim id est laborum. Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua. Ut enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exercitation ulla
Legal Analysis
The Eleventh Circuit's analysis centered on the scope of strict liability under Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua. Ut enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exercitation ullamco laboris nisi ut aliquip ex ea commodo consequat. Duis aute irure dolor in reprehenderit in voluptate velit esse cillum dolore eu fugiat nulla pariatur. Excepteur sint occaecat cupidatat non proident, sunt in culpa qui officia deserunt mollit anim id est laborum. Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua. Ut enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exercitation ullamco laboris nisi ut aliquip ex ea commodo consequat. Duis aute irure dolor in reprehenderit in voluptate velit esse cillum dolore eu fugiat nulla pariatur. Excepteur sint occaecat cupidatat non proident, sunt in culpa qui officia deserunt mollit anim id est laborum. Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua. Ut enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exercitation ullamco laboris nisi ut aliquip ex ea commodo consequat. Duis aute irure dolor in reprehenderit in voluptate velit esse cillum dolore eu fugiat nulla pariatur. Excepteur sint occaecat cupidatat non proident, sunt in culpa qui officia deserunt mollit anim id est laborum. Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua. Ut enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exercitation ullamco laboris nisi ut aliquip ex ea commodo consequat. Duis aute irure dolor in reprehenderit in voluptate velit esse cillum dolore eu fugiat nulla pariatur. Excepteur sint occaecat cupidatat non proident, sunt in culpa qui officia deserunt mollit anim id est laborum. Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua. Ut enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exercitation ullamco laboris
Flash-to-Full Case Opinions
Flash Summary
- The National Marine Sanctuaries Act (NMSA) imposes strict liability for damage