STATE FARM MUT. AUTOMOBILE INS. CO. v. CAMPBELL Case Brief
Complete case briefs with LSD+
Every LSD.Law brief pairs a full IRAC analysis with opinion summaries at three levels of depth, written by a team of Harvard Law and MIT graduates - a quick synopsis when you are pressed for time, the complete reasoning when you need to go deep.
Adaptive Case Views
Toggle between Flash, Standard, and Expanded. Get what you need, when you need it.
Exam-Ready IRAC Format
We deliver the precise structure professors look for in exam answers.
Complex Cases, Clarified
We break down dense legal reasoning into something digestible, helping you grasp core concepts.
tl;dr: An insurance company’s bad-faith refusal to settle a claim resulted in a $145 million punitive damages award. The Supreme Court found the award unconstitutionally excessive under the Due Process Clause, establishing stricter guidelines and a presumptive single-digit ratio for such awards.
Legal Significance: This case significantly strengthened substantive due process limits on punitive damages by establishing a presumptive single-digit ratio between punitive and compensatory damages and by prohibiting punishment for dissimilar or out-of-state conduct that has no nexus to the plaintiff’s harm.
STATE FARM MUT. AUTOMOBILE INS. CO. v. CAMPBELL Law School Study Guide
Use this case brief structure for your own legal analysis. Focus on the IRAC methodology to excel in law school exams and cold calls.
Case Facts & Court Holding
Key Facts & Case Background
Curtis Campbell caused a car accident that killed one person and permanently disabled another. His insurer, State Farm, despite evidence of Campbell’s clear fault, refused to settle the claims for the $50,000 policy limit. A jury found Campbell 100% at fault and returned a judgment for $185,849. State Farm initially refused to pay the excess liability, advising Campbell to sell his property. Although State Farm eventually paid the full judgment, the Campbells sued for bad faith, fraud, and intentional infliction of emotional distress. At trial, the Campbells introduced extensive evidence of State Farm’s nationwide business practices, unrelated to their specific claim, which were designed to limit payouts. The jury awarded the Campbells $1 million in compensatory damages and $145 million in punitive damages. The Utah Supreme Court reinstated the full punitive award, reasoning that State Farm’s nationwide conduct was highly reprehensible. The U.S. Supreme Court granted certiorari to determine if the award was unconstitutionally excessive.
Court Holding & Legal Precedent
Issue: Does a $145 million punitive damages award, where compensatory damages are $1 million, violate the Due Process Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment when it is based largely on the defendant’s nationwide conduct unrelated to the plaintiff’s specific harm?
Yes. A punitive damages award of $145 million, where compensatory damages are Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua. Ut enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exercitation ullamco laboris nisi ut aliquip ex ea commodo consequat. Duis aute
IRAC Legal Analysis
About IRAC analysis
IRAC (Issue, Rule, Analysis, Conclusion) is the structure professors expect in exam answers. Each LSD.Law brief states the issue, the governing rule with citations, the court's application of that rule, and the conclusion - the same reasoning pattern you will use on exams and in practice.
Legal Issue
Does a $145 million punitive damages award, where compensatory damages are $1 million, violate the Due Process Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment when it is based largely on the defendant’s nationwide conduct unrelated to the plaintiff’s specific harm?
Conclusion
This decision substantially narrowed the scope for large punitive damages awards by Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua. Ut enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exercitation ullamco la
Legal Rule
The Due Process Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment prohibits the imposition of Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua. Ut enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exercitation ullamco laboris nisi ut aliquip ex ea commodo consequat. Duis aute irure dolor in reprehenderit in voluptate velit esse cillum dolore eu fugiat nulla pariatur. Excepteur sint occaecat cupidatat non proident, sunt in culpa qui officia deserunt mollit anim id est laborum. Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipisci
Legal Analysis
The Court conducted a de novo review applying the three *Gore* guideposts. Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua. Ut enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exercitation ullamco laboris nisi ut aliquip ex ea commodo consequat. Duis aute irure dolor in reprehenderit in voluptate velit esse cillum dolore eu fugiat nulla pariatur. Excepteur sint occaecat cupidatat non proident, sunt in culpa qui officia deserunt mollit anim id est laborum. Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua. Ut enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exercitation ullamco laboris nisi ut aliquip ex ea commodo consequat. Duis aute irure dolor in reprehenderit in voluptate velit esse cillum dolore eu fugiat nulla pariatur. Excepteur sint occaecat cupidatat non proident, sunt in culpa qui officia deserunt mollit anim id est laborum. Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua. Ut enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exercitation ullamco laboris nisi ut aliquip ex ea commodo consequat. Duis aute irure dolor in reprehenderit in voluptate velit esse cillum dolore eu fugiat nulla pariatur. Excepteur sint occaecat cupidatat non proident, sunt in culpa qui officia deserunt mollit anim id est laborum. Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua. Ut enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exercitation ullamco laboris nisi ut aliquip ex ea commodo consequat. Duis aute irure dolor in reprehenderit in voluptate velit esse cillum dolore eu fugiat nulla pariatur. Excepteur sint occaecat cupidatat non proident, sunt in culpa qui offici
Flash-to-Full Case Opinions
Flash Summary
- The Due Process Clause prohibits “grossly excessive” punitive damages that amount