St. Louis, Iron Mountain & Southern Railway Co. v. Williams Case Brief
Complete case briefs with LSD+
Every LSD.Law brief pairs a full IRAC analysis with opinion summaries at three levels of depth, written by a team of Harvard Law and MIT graduates - a quick synopsis when you are pressed for time, the complete reasoning when you need to go deep.
Adaptive Case Views
Toggle between Flash, Standard, and Expanded. Get what you need, when you need it.
Exam-Ready IRAC Format
We deliver the precise structure professors look for in exam answers.
Complex Cases, Clarified
We break down dense legal reasoning into something digestible, helping you grasp core concepts.
Case Brief Summary & Legal Analysis
tl;dr: A railroad challenged a state law imposing a $75 penalty for a 66-cent fare overcharge, arguing it violated due process. The Supreme Court upheld the penalty, finding it was not so severe or disproportionate as to be unconstitutional, given the state’s interest in enforcing its regulations.
Legal Significance: This case affirms a state’s broad discretion under its police power to impose substantial, punitive civil penalties to enforce economic regulations, provided the penalty is not “wholly disproportioned to the offense” and an opportunity exists to challenge the underlying regulation’s validity without incurring penalties.
Case Facts & Court Holding
Key Facts & Case Background
An Arkansas statute regulated passenger rail fares and imposed a penalty of not less than $50 and not more than $300 for each instance a railroad charged more than the prescribed rate. The penalty was recoverable in a civil action by the aggrieved passenger. St. Louis, Iron Mountain & Southern Railway Co. (the “Railway”) overcharged two passengers by sixty-six cents each. The passengers sued and each recovered the overcharge plus a $75 penalty and a $25 attorney’s fee, as provided by the statute. The Railway appealed, not to contest the overcharge itself, but to challenge the constitutionality of the penalty provision. The Railway argued that the penalty violated the Due Process Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment because it was so severe that it deterred challenges to the rate’s validity and was arbitrarily disproportionate to the actual damage sustained by the passengers. The Railway had not previously challenged the validity of the rate itself through available judicial procedures, such as an equity suit for an injunction. The Arkansas Supreme Court affirmed the judgments, upholding the statute.
Court Holding & Legal Precedent
Issue: Does a state statute that imposes a civil penalty between $50 and $300, payable to the aggrieved passenger, for each fare overcharge violate the Due Process Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment as being excessively severe or disproportionate to the offense?
No. The Court held that the Arkansas statute’s penalty provision did not Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua. Ut enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exercitation ullamco laboris nisi ut aliquip ex ea commodo consequat. Duis aute irure dolor in reprehenderit in voluptate velit esse cillum dolore eu fugiat nulla pariatur. Excepteur sint occaecat cupidatat non proident, sunt in culpa qui officia deserunt mollit anim id est laborum. Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, se
IRAC Legal Analysis
About IRAC analysis
IRAC (Issue, Rule, Analysis, Conclusion) is the structure professors expect in exam answers. Each LSD.Law brief states the issue, the governing rule with citations, the court's application of that rule, and the conclusion - the same reasoning pattern you will use on exams and in practice.
Legal Issue
Does a state statute that imposes a civil penalty between $50 and $300, payable to the aggrieved passenger, for each fare overcharge violate the Due Process Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment as being excessively severe or disproportionate to the offense?
Conclusion
This case establishes that states have significant latitude under their police powers Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua. Ut enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exercitation ullamco laboris
Legal Rule
The Due Process Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment limits a state's power Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua. Ut enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exercitation ullamco laboris nisi ut aliquip ex ea commodo consequat. Duis aute irure dolor in reprehenderit in voluptate velit esse cillum dolore eu fugiat nulla pariatur. Excepteur sint occaecat cupidatat non proident, sunt in culpa qui officia deserunt mollit anim
Legal Analysis
The Court analyzed the Railway's due process challenge in two parts. First, Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua. Ut enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exercitation ullamco laboris nisi ut aliquip ex ea commodo consequat. Duis aute irure dolor in reprehenderit in voluptate velit esse cillum dolore eu fugiat nulla pariatur. Excepteur sint occaecat cupidatat non proident, sunt in culpa qui officia deserunt mollit anim id est laborum. Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua. Ut enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exercitation ullamco laboris nisi ut aliquip ex ea commodo consequat. Duis aute irure dolor in reprehenderit in voluptate velit esse cillum dolore eu fugiat nulla pariatur. Excepteur sint occaecat cupidatat non proident, sunt in culpa qui officia deserunt mollit anim id est laborum. Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua. Ut enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exercitation ullamco laboris nisi ut aliquip ex ea commodo consequat. Duis aute irure dolor in reprehenderit in voluptate velit esse cillum dolore eu fugiat nulla pariatur. Excepteur sint occaecat cupidatat non proident, sunt in culpa qui officia deserunt mollit anim id est laborum. Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua. Ut enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exercitation ulla
Flash-to-Full Case Opinions
Flash Summary
- A state statute imposing a $50-$300 penalty on a railroad for