SHEET METAL WORKERS, LOCAL UNION NO. 91 v. N.L.R.B. Case Brief
Complete case briefs with LSD+
Every LSD.Law brief pairs a full IRAC analysis with opinion summaries at three levels of depth, written by a team of Harvard Law and MIT graduates - a quick synopsis when you are pressed for time, the complete reasoning when you need to go deep.
Adaptive Case Views
Toggle between Flash, Standard, and Expanded. Get what you need, when you need it.
Exam-Ready IRAC Format
We deliver the precise structure professors look for in exam answers.
Complex Cases, Clarified
We break down dense legal reasoning into something digestible, helping you grasp core concepts.
Case Brief Summary & Legal Analysis
tl;dr: A union’s contract clause allowing it to cancel an agreement if an employer affiliated with a non-union company was held to be an illegal “hot cargo” agreement under the National Labor Relations Act (NLRA).
Legal Significance: This case clarifies that a contract clause creating significant economic pressure to sever ties with non-union affiliates, such as a contract rescission threat, constitutes an unlawful secondary “hot cargo” agreement under NLRA § 8(e).
SHEET METAL WORKERS, LOCAL UNION NO. 91 v. N.L.R.B. Law School Study Guide
Use this case brief structure for your own legal analysis. Focus on the IRAC methodology to excel in law school exams and cold calls.
Case Facts & Court Holding
Key Facts & Case Background
The Sheet Metal Workers Union developed an “Integrity Clause” to combat “double-breasted” employers who operated both union and non-union shops. The clause, intended for inclusion in collective bargaining agreements (CBAs), had three parts. Section one defined a “bad faith employer” as one affiliated with a non-union sheet metal business. Section two required the employer to notify the union if it became a “bad faith employer.” Section three authorized the union to rescind the CBA with any such employer. The Union pressured employers to adopt the clause by withholding discretionary wage concessions, known as “Resolution 78 relief,” from those who refused. One employer, Schebler, refused to sign because it had a non-union affiliate and was subsequently denied Resolution 78 relief, causing it to lose contracts. Another employer, Winger, agreed to the clause. Schebler filed an unfair labor practice charge, and the National Labor Relations Board (NLRB) found the Integrity Clause violated § 8(e) of the NLRA as an unlawful “hot cargo” agreement and that the Union’s pressure tactics violated § 8(b)(4)(ii)(A).
Court Holding & Legal Precedent
Issue: Did the National Labor Relations Board correctly determine that a collective bargaining agreement’s “Integrity Clause,” which permitted the union to rescind the agreement if the employer affiliated with a non-union entity, constituted an unlawful secondary “hot cargo” agreement under § 8(e) of the National Labor Relations Act?
Yes, the Board reasonably concluded the Integrity Clause as a whole violates Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua. Ut enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exercitation ullamco laboris nisi ut aliquip ex ea commodo consequat. Duis aute irure dolor in reprehenderit in voluptate veli
IRAC Legal Analysis
About IRAC analysis
IRAC (Issue, Rule, Analysis, Conclusion) is the structure professors expect in exam answers. Each LSD.Law brief states the issue, the governing rule with citations, the court's application of that rule, and the conclusion - the same reasoning pattern you will use on exams and in practice.
Legal Issue
Did the National Labor Relations Board correctly determine that a collective bargaining agreement’s “Integrity Clause,” which permitted the union to rescind the agreement if the employer affiliated with a non-union entity, constituted an unlawful secondary “hot cargo” agreement under § 8(e) of the National Labor Relations Act?
Conclusion
This case establishes that a contract rescission clause used to penalize an Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua. Ut enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exercitation ullamco laboris
Legal Rule
An agreement between a union and an employer to cease doing business Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua. Ut enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exercitation ullamco laboris nisi ut aliquip ex ea commodo consequat. Duis aute irure dolor in reprehenderit in voluptate velit esse cillum dolore eu fugiat nulla pariatur. Excepteur sint occaecat cupidatat non proident, sunt in culpa qui officia deserunt mollit anim id est laborum. Lorem ipsum
Legal Analysis
The court upheld the Board's determination that the Integrity Clause violated § Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua. Ut enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exercitation ullamco laboris nisi ut aliquip ex ea commodo consequat. Duis aute irure dolor in reprehenderit in voluptate velit esse cillum dolore eu fugiat nulla pariatur. Excepteur sint occaecat cupidatat non proident, sunt in culpa qui officia deserunt mollit anim id est laborum. Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua. Ut enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exercitation ullamco laboris nisi ut aliquip ex ea commodo consequat. Duis aute irure dolor in reprehenderit in voluptate velit esse cillum dolore eu fugiat nulla pariatur. Excepteur sint occaecat cupidatat non proident, sunt in culpa qui officia deserunt mollit anim id est laborum. Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua. Ut enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exercitation ullamco laboris nisi ut aliquip ex ea commodo consequat. Duis aute irure dolor in reprehenderit in voluptate velit esse cillum dolore eu fugiat nulla pariatur. Excepteur sint occaecat cupidatat non proident, sunt in culpa qui officia deserunt mollit anim id est laborum. Lo
Flash-to-Full Case Opinions
Flash Summary
- A contract clause allowing a union to rescind a CBA if