Robert Lawrence Company, Inc. v. Devonshire Fabrics, Inc. Case Brief

Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit • 1959 • Docket #248207
271 F.2d 402 1959 U.S. App. LEXIS 5298

Complete case briefs with LSD+

Every LSD.Law brief pairs a full IRAC analysis with opinion summaries at three levels of depth, written by a team of Harvard Law and MIT graduates - a quick synopsis when you are pressed for time, the complete reasoning when you need to go deep.

Adaptive Case Views

Toggle between Flash, Standard, and Expanded. Get what you need, when you need it.

Exam-Ready IRAC Format

We deliver the precise structure professors look for in exam answers.

Complex Cases, Clarified

We break down dense legal reasoning into something digestible, helping you grasp core concepts.

Case Brief Summary & Legal Analysis

4 min read

tl;dr: A buyer alleged a seller fraudulently induced it into a sales contract. The court held that the Federal Arbitration Act creates federal substantive law, making the contract’s arbitration clause a separate, enforceable agreement that requires the fraud claim itself to be decided by an arbitrator, not a court.

Legal Significance: This case established the influential “separability doctrine” under the Federal Arbitration Act (FAA), holding that an arbitration clause is severable from the main contract. It also declared that the FAA creates a body of federal substantive law, preempting contrary state law in matters involving interstate commerce.

Case Facts & Court Holding

Key Facts & Case Background

Robert Lawrence Company, Inc. (“Lawrence”), a Massachusetts corporation, purchased woolen fabric from Devonshire Fabrics, Inc. (“Devonshire”), a New York corporation. Both the purchase order and the sales confirmation contained an identical, broad arbitration clause stating that “Any complaint, controversy, or question which may arise with respect to this contract…shall be referred to arbitration.” After paying for the goods, Lawrence discovered alleged latent defects and sued Devonshire in federal court, asserting diversity jurisdiction. Lawrence sought damages for fraudulent misrepresentations, claiming it was induced to enter the contract by Devonshire’s false claims about the fabric’s quality. Lawrence argued that because the entire contract was voidable due to fraud, the arbitration clause contained within it was unenforceable. Devonshire moved to stay the court proceedings pending arbitration pursuant to § 3 of the Federal Arbitration Act (FAA). The district court denied the stay, reasoning that a court must first determine the validity of the underlying contract before an arbitration clause within it can be enforced.

Court Holding & Legal Precedent

Issue: Under the Federal Arbitration Act, when a party alleges fraud in the inducement of a contract as a whole, rather than the arbitration clause specifically, is the issue of fraud to be resolved by the court or by the arbitrator?

Reversed. The court held that the FAA creates federal substantive law that Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua. Ut enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exercitation ullamco laboris nisi ut aliquip ex ea commodo consequat. Duis aute irure dolor in reprehenderit in voluptate velit esse cillum dolore eu fugiat nulla pariatur. Excepteur sint occaecat cupidatat non proident, sunt in culpa qui officia deserunt mollit anim id est l

Read the full analysis

The complete holding, rule, and analysis for this case are available to LSD+ subscribers.

Start 14-Day Free Trial

IRAC Legal Analysis

Premium Feature Unlock

About IRAC analysis

IRAC (Issue, Rule, Analysis, Conclusion) is the structure professors expect in exam answers. Each LSD.Law brief states the issue, the governing rule with citations, the court's application of that rule, and the conclusion - the same reasoning pattern you will use on exams and in practice.

Legal Issue

Under the Federal Arbitration Act, when a party alleges fraud in the inducement of a contract as a whole, rather than the arbitration clause specifically, is the issue of fraud to be resolved by the court or by the arbitrator?

Conclusion

This case was a landmark decision that significantly bolstered the enforceability of Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua. Ut enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exercitation ullamco laboris nisi ut aliqui

Legal Rule

The Federal Arbitration Act creates a body of federal substantive law, applicable Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua. Ut enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exercitation ullamco laboris nisi ut aliquip ex ea commodo consequat. Duis aute irure dolor in reprehenderit in voluptate velit esse cillum dolore eu fugiat nulla pariatur. Excepteur sint occaecat cupidatat

Legal Analysis

The Second Circuit's analysis proceeded in two main parts. First, it addressed Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua. Ut enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exercitation ullamco laboris nisi ut aliquip ex ea commodo consequat. Duis aute irure dolor in reprehenderit in voluptate velit esse cillum dolore eu fugiat nulla pariatur. Excepteur sint occaecat cupidatat non proident, sunt in culpa qui officia deserunt mollit anim id est laborum. Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua. Ut enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exercitation ullamco laboris nisi ut aliquip ex ea commodo consequat. Duis aute irure dolor in reprehenderit in voluptate velit esse cillum dolore eu fugiat nulla pariatur. Excepteur sint occaecat cupidatat non proident, sunt in culpa qui officia deserunt mollit anim id est laborum. Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua. Ut enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exercitation ullamco laboris nisi ut aliquip ex ea commodo consequat. Duis aute irure dolor in reprehenderit in voluptate velit esse cillum dolore eu fugiat nulla pariatur. Excepteur sint occaecat cupidatat non proident, sunt in culpa qui officia deserunt mollit anim id est laborum. Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua. Ut enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exercitation ullamco laboris nisi ut aliquip ex ea commodo consequat. Duis aute irure dol

Flash-to-Full Case Opinions

Flash Summary

  • The Federal Arbitration Act (FAA) creates federal substantive law governing arbitration
Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua. Ut enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exercitation ullamco laboris nisi ut aliquip ex ea commodo consequat. Duis aute irure dolor in reprehenderit in voluptate

Read the full analysis

The complete holding, rule, and analysis for this case are available to LSD+ subscribers.

Start 14-Day Free Trial