Rathke v. MacFarlane Case Brief
Complete case briefs with LSD+
Every LSD.Law brief pairs a full IRAC analysis with opinion summaries at three levels of depth, written by a team of Harvard Law and MIT graduates - a quick synopsis when you are pressed for time, the complete reasoning when you need to go deep.
Adaptive Case Views
Toggle between Flash, Standard, and Expanded. Get what you need, when you need it.
Exam-Ready IRAC Format
We deliver the precise structure professors look for in exam answers.
Complex Cases, Clarified
We break down dense legal reasoning into something digestible, helping you grasp core concepts.
Case Brief Summary & Legal Analysis
tl;dr: Precious metal dealers sought to block a new state law imposing a 30-day holding period on purchased items. The court denied their request for a preliminary injunction, finding they failed to show a reasonable probability of proving the law was unconstitutional.
Legal Significance: This case establishes the stringent, multi-factor test for granting a preliminary injunction against the enforcement of a criminal statute, clarifying that the movant must show a reasonable probability of succeeding on the merits under the ultimate, heightened burden of proof at trial.
Rathke v. MacFarlane Law School Study Guide
Use this case brief structure for your own legal analysis. Focus on the IRAC methodology to excel in law school exams and cold calls.
Case Facts & Court Holding
Key Facts & Case Background
Appellants were merchants engaged in buying and selling precious metals and stones. Their business model depended on the immediate resale of purchased articles to third parties via teletype, with delivery required within 48 hours. This practice allowed them to lock in a fixed profit and avoid market speculation. In 1981, Colorado enacted a statute, C.R.S. § 18-16-101 et seq., to combat trafficking in stolen goods. The law required purchasers of “valuable articles” to record detailed information about each transaction and, crucially, to hold each article for thirty days before resale or alteration. Appellants argued that the 30-day holding period would destroy their business model and constituted an unconstitutional taking of property, among other challenges. They sought a declaratory judgment and filed a motion for a preliminary injunction to prevent the state from enforcing the statute. The trial court found that the appellants demonstrated irreparable injury but denied the preliminary injunction, concluding they had not established a reasonable probability of success on the merits of their constitutional challenge.
Court Holding & Legal Precedent
Issue: Did the trial court abuse its discretion in denying a preliminary injunction to enjoin the enforcement of a criminal statute by requiring the moving party to establish a reasonable probability of proving the statute unconstitutional beyond a reasonable doubt?
No. The trial court did not abuse its discretion in denying the Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua. Ut enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exercitation ullamco laboris nisi ut aliquip ex ea commodo consequat. Duis aute irure dolor in reprehenderit in voluptate velit esse cillum dolore eu fugi
IRAC Legal Analysis
About IRAC analysis
IRAC (Issue, Rule, Analysis, Conclusion) is the structure professors expect in exam answers. Each LSD.Law brief states the issue, the governing rule with citations, the court's application of that rule, and the conclusion - the same reasoning pattern you will use on exams and in practice.
Legal Issue
Did the trial court abuse its discretion in denying a preliminary injunction to enjoin the enforcement of a criminal statute by requiring the moving party to establish a reasonable probability of proving the statute unconstitutional beyond a reasonable doubt?
Conclusion
This case provides a key procedural framework in Colorado for parties seeking Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua. Ut enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exercitation ullamco labor
Legal Rule
To obtain a preliminary injunction against the enforcement of a criminal statute, Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua. Ut enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exercitation ullamco laboris nisi ut aliquip ex ea commodo consequat. Duis aute irure dolor in reprehenderit in voluptate velit esse cillum dolore eu fugiat nulla pariatur. Excepteur sint occaecat cupidatat non proident, sunt in culpa qui officia deserunt mollit anim id est laborum. Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua. Ut enim ad
Legal Analysis
The Supreme Court of Colorado affirmed the trial court's denial of the Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua. Ut enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exercitation ullamco laboris nisi ut aliquip ex ea commodo consequat. Duis aute irure dolor in reprehenderit in voluptate velit esse cillum dolore eu fugiat nulla pariatur. Excepteur sint occaecat cupidatat non proident, sunt in culpa qui officia deserunt mollit anim id est laborum. Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua. Ut enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exercitation ullamco laboris nisi ut aliquip ex ea commodo consequat. Duis aute irure dolor in reprehenderit in voluptate velit esse cillum dolore eu fugiat nulla pariatur. Excepteur sint occaecat cupidatat non proident, sunt in culpa qui officia deserunt mollit anim id est laborum. Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua. Ut enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exercitation ullamco laboris nisi ut aliquip ex ea commodo consequat. Duis aute irure dolor in reprehenderit in voluptate velit esse cillum dolore eu fugiat nulla pariatur. Excepteur sint occaecat cupidatat non proident, sunt in culpa qui officia deserunt mollit anim id est laborum. Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna ali
Flash-to-Full Case Opinions
Flash Summary
- To obtain a preliminary injunction against a criminal statute, a plaintiff