ProCD, Inc. v. Zeidenberg Case Brief
Audio lesson available for this case
LSD+ subscribers can listen to a recorded discussion of this brief - the full facts, holding, and reasoning in audio form.
Complete case briefs with LSD+
Every LSD.Law brief pairs a full IRAC analysis with opinion summaries at three levels of depth, written by a team of Harvard Law and MIT graduates - a quick synopsis when you are pressed for time, the complete reasoning when you need to go deep.
Adaptive Case Views
Toggle between Flash, Standard, and Expanded. Get what you need, when you need it.
Exam-Ready IRAC Format
We deliver the precise structure professors look for in exam answers.
Complex Cases, Clarified
We break down dense legal reasoning into something digestible, helping you grasp core concepts.
Case Brief Summary & Legal Analysis
tl;dr: A software company sold a product with a license inside the box restricting its use. A buyer used it in a prohibited commercial manner. The court enforced the license, finding a contract was formed when the buyer used the software after seeing the terms.
Legal Significance: Established that “shrinkwrap” licenses are enforceable contracts. A vendor may propose that using a product constitutes acceptance of terms provided inside the packaging, so long as the buyer has an opportunity to reject the terms by returning the product for a refund.
ProCD, Inc. v. Zeidenberg Law School Study Guide
Use this case brief structure for your own legal analysis. Focus on the IRAC methodology to excel in law school exams and cold calls.
Case Facts & Court Holding
Key Facts & Case Background
ProCD, Inc. developed a computer database containing information from over 3,000 telephone directories. It engaged in price discrimination by selling a low-priced consumer version and a high-priced commercial version. The consumer version’s box mentioned that the software was subject to an enclosed license. This “shrinkwrap license,” which was printed in the manual and appeared on the user’s screen upon running the software, restricted use to non-commercial purposes. The license also provided that a buyer who disagreed with the terms could return the software for a full refund. Matthew Zeidenberg purchased a consumer package but chose to ignore the license. He formed a corporation and began reselling the database’s information online at a price lower than ProCD’s commercial rate. ProCD filed suit seeking an injunction, alleging a breach of the license agreement. The district court held that the license was unenforceable because its terms were not presented to the buyer at the time of the transaction.
Court Holding & Legal Precedent
Issue: Is a shrinkwrap license, the terms of which are contained inside a product’s packaging, an enforceable contract when the purchaser can accept the terms by using the software or reject them by returning the product for a refund?
Yes. The shrinkwrap license is an enforceable contract. The court reversed the Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua. Ut enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exercitation ullamco laboris nisi ut aliquip ex ea commodo consequat. Duis aute ir
IRAC Legal Analysis
About IRAC analysis
IRAC (Issue, Rule, Analysis, Conclusion) is the structure professors expect in exam answers. Each LSD.Law brief states the issue, the governing rule with citations, the court's application of that rule, and the conclusion - the same reasoning pattern you will use on exams and in practice.
Legal Issue
Is a shrinkwrap license, the terms of which are contained inside a product’s packaging, an enforceable contract when the purchaser can accept the terms by using the software or reject them by returning the product for a refund?
Conclusion
This landmark decision validated the enforceability of shrinkwrap and, by extension, clickwrap Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua. Ut enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exercitation ullamco laboris nisi ut aliquip ex ea commodo consequat. Duis
Legal Rule
Under U.C.C. § 2-204, a contract for the sale of goods may Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua. Ut enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exercitation ullamco laboris nisi ut aliquip ex ea commodo consequat. Duis aute irure dolor in reprehenderit in voluptate veli
Legal Analysis
The court, applying the Uniform Commercial Code (UCC), rejected the district court's Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua. Ut enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exercitation ullamco laboris nisi ut aliquip ex ea commodo consequat. Duis aute irure dolor in reprehenderit in voluptate velit esse cillum dolore eu fugiat nulla pariatur. Excepteur sint occaecat cupidatat non proident, sunt in culpa qui officia deserunt mollit anim id est laborum. Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua. Ut enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exercitation ullamco laboris nisi ut aliquip ex ea commodo consequat. Duis aute irure dolor in reprehenderit in voluptate velit esse cillum dolore eu fugiat nulla pariatur. Excepteur sint occaecat cupidatat non proident, sunt in culpa qui officia deserunt mollit anim id est laborum. Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua. Ut enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exercitation ullamco laboris nisi ut aliquip ex ea commodo consequat. Duis aute irure dolor in reprehenderit in voluptate velit esse cillum dolore eu fugiat nulla pariatur. Excepteur sint occaecat cupidatat non proident, sunt in culpa qui officia deserunt mollit anim id est laborum. Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adi
Flash-to-Full Case Opinions
Flash Summary
- Shrinkwrap licenses are enforceable contracts if the buyer accepts the terms