Phillip Kunkel, Trustee of the Bankruptcy Estate of John D. Morken and Dorothy M. Morken v. Sprague National Bank, First National Bank of Hoxie, Kansas, Hoxie Feeders, Inc., Charles W. Ries, Trustee of the Bankruptcy Estate of Spring Grove Livestock Exchange, Inc., Firstar Bank Milwaukee, N.A., and Firstar Bank Sioux City, N.A. Case Brief
Complete case briefs with LSD+
Every LSD.Law brief pairs a full IRAC analysis with opinion summaries at three levels of depth, written by a team of Harvard Law and MIT graduates - a quick synopsis when you are pressed for time, the complete reasoning when you need to go deep.
Adaptive Case Views
Toggle between Flash, Standard, and Expanded. Get what you need, when you need it.
Exam-Ready IRAC Format
We deliver the precise structure professors look for in exam answers.
Complex Cases, Clarified
We break down dense legal reasoning into something digestible, helping you grasp core concepts.
Case Brief Summary & Legal Analysis
tl;dr: A priority dispute between a bank with an after-acquired property interest and a cattle seller with a purchase money security interest (PMSI). The court held the PMSI holder had superpriority, even though it perfected by possession and the debtor never physically possessed the collateral.
Legal Significance: Clarifies that a debtor can have sufficient “rights in the collateral” through constructive possession. It also establishes that a PMSI creditor perfecting by possession can achieve superpriority under UCC § 9-312(3) if notification is timely relative to the debtor’s potential for actual physical possession.
Case Facts & Court Holding
Key Facts & Case Background
Sprague National Bank held a perfected security interest in debtor Morken’s current and after-acquired inventory, secured by a filed financing statement. Subsequently, Morken purchased cattle from Hoxie Feeders, Inc., which financed the purchase and retained a purchase money security interest (PMSI). The cattle remained at Hoxie’s feedlot under agreements that identified Morken as the owner, placed the risk of profit or loss on him, and gave him authority over their ultimate sale. Hoxie perfected its PMSI by this continued possession, not by filing. After Morken’s bankruptcy, Hoxie sold the cattle, leading to a dispute over the proceeds. Sprague argued its interest attached to the cattle as after-acquired property and had priority as the first to perfect. Hoxie claimed PMSI superpriority. After the cattle were sold and litigation began, Hoxie sent a formal PMSI notification to Sprague. The lower courts found for Hoxie, but on different grounds.
Court Holding & Legal Precedent
Issue: In a priority dispute over inventory, does a purchase money security interest perfected by the seller’s continued possession have priority over a prior perfected security interest in after-acquired property, even when the debtor never takes physical possession of the collateral?
Yes, Hoxie’s purchase money security interest has priority over Sprague’s prior perfected Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua. Ut enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exercitation ullamco laboris nisi ut aliquip ex ea commodo consequat. Duis aute irure dolor in reprehenderit in voluptate velit esse cillum dolore eu fugiat nulla pariatur. Excepteur sint occaecat cupidatat non proi
IRAC Legal Analysis
About IRAC analysis
IRAC (Issue, Rule, Analysis, Conclusion) is the structure professors expect in exam answers. Each LSD.Law brief states the issue, the governing rule with citations, the court's application of that rule, and the conclusion - the same reasoning pattern you will use on exams and in practice.
Legal Issue
In a priority dispute over inventory, does a purchase money security interest perfected by the seller’s continued possession have priority over a prior perfected security interest in after-acquired property, even when the debtor never takes physical possession of the collateral?
Conclusion
This case confirms that PMSI superpriority under UCC § 9-312(3) is available Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua. Ut enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exercitation ullamco laboris
Legal Rule
A debtor has sufficient "rights in the collateral" under UCC § 9-203(1)(c) Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua. Ut enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exercitation ullamco laboris nisi ut aliquip ex ea commodo consequat. Duis aute irure dolor in reprehenderit in voluptate velit esse cillum dolore eu fugiat nulla pariatur. Excepteur sint occaecat cupidatat non proident, sunt in culpa qui officia deserunt mollit anim id est laborum.
Legal Analysis
The court first addressed whether Sprague's security interest attached to the cattle. Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua. Ut enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exercitation ullamco laboris nisi ut aliquip ex ea commodo consequat. Duis aute irure dolor in reprehenderit in voluptate velit esse cillum dolore eu fugiat nulla pariatur. Excepteur sint occaecat cupidatat non proident, sunt in culpa qui officia deserunt mollit anim id est laborum. Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua. Ut enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exercitation ullamco laboris nisi ut aliquip ex ea commodo consequat. Duis aute irure dolor in reprehenderit in voluptate velit esse cillum dolore eu fugiat nulla pariatur. Excepteur sint occaecat cupidatat non proident, sunt in culpa qui officia deserunt mollit anim id est laborum. Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua. Ut enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exercitation ullamco laboris nisi ut aliquip ex ea commodo consequat. Duis aute irure dolor in reprehenderit in voluptate velit esse cillum dolore eu fugiat nulla pariatur. Excepteur sint occaecat cupidatat non proident, sunt in culpa qui officia deserunt mo
Flash-to-Full Case Opinions
Flash Summary
- A debtor acquires “rights in the collateral” (UCC § 9-203) through