Phelps Dodge Corp. v. National Labor Relations Board Case Brief
Complete case briefs with LSD+
Every LSD.Law brief pairs a full IRAC analysis with opinion summaries at three levels of depth, written by a team of Harvard Law and MIT graduates - a quick synopsis when you are pressed for time, the complete reasoning when you need to go deep.
Adaptive Case Views
Toggle between Flash, Standard, and Expanded. Get what you need, when you need it.
Exam-Ready IRAC Format
We deliver the precise structure professors look for in exam answers.
Complex Cases, Clarified
We break down dense legal reasoning into something digestible, helping you grasp core concepts.
Case Brief Summary & Legal Analysis
tl;dr: An employer refused to hire job applicants because of their union membership. The Supreme Court held this was an illegal unfair labor practice and affirmed the National Labor Relations Board’s power to order the employer to hire the applicants with back pay.
Legal Significance: This landmark case established that the National Labor Relations Act’s prohibition on anti-union discrimination extends to hiring decisions, not just firing. It affirmed the NLRB’s broad remedial authority to order instatement (hiring) and back pay for victims of such discrimination.
Phelps Dodge Corp. v. National Labor Relations Board Law School Study Guide
Use this case brief structure for your own legal analysis. Focus on the IRAC methodology to excel in law school exams and cold calls.
Case Facts & Court Holding
Key Facts & Case Background
Following a strike at its Copper Queen Mine, Phelps Dodge Corporation refused to hire several individuals because of their affiliation with the striking union. Among those denied employment were two men, Curtis and Daugherty, who had not been employees prior to the strike but sought jobs after it ended. The other individuals were former employees who had participated in the strike. The National Labor Relations Board (NLRB) found that the company’s refusal to hire these men constituted an unfair labor practice under § 8(3) of the National Labor Relations Act (NLRA). To remedy the violation, the Board ordered Phelps Dodge to cease and desist its discriminatory practices and to take affirmative action, including offering employment to all the men who were discriminated against and providing them with back pay. The Court of Appeals enforced the order concerning the strikers but refused to enforce it for Curtis and Daugherty, holding the NLRB lacked the power to order the hiring of individuals who were never employees. The Supreme Court granted certiorari to resolve the scope of the NLRA’s protections and the NLRB’s remedial powers.
Court Holding & Legal Precedent
Issue: Does the National Labor Relations Act prohibit an employer from refusing to hire individuals solely because of their union membership, and if so, does the National Labor Relations Board have the authority to compel that employer to hire those individuals with back pay?
Yes. The Court held that an employer’s refusal to hire individuals based Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua. Ut enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exercitation ullamco laboris nisi ut aliquip ex ea commodo consequat. Duis aute irure dolor in reprehenderit in voluptate velit esse cillum dolore eu fugiat nulla pariatur. Excepteur sint occaecat cupidatat non proident, sunt in culpa qui officia
IRAC Legal Analysis
About IRAC analysis
IRAC (Issue, Rule, Analysis, Conclusion) is the structure professors expect in exam answers. Each LSD.Law brief states the issue, the governing rule with citations, the court's application of that rule, and the conclusion - the same reasoning pattern you will use on exams and in practice.
Legal Issue
Does the National Labor Relations Act prohibit an employer from refusing to hire individuals solely because of their union membership, and if so, does the National Labor Relations Board have the authority to compel that employer to hire those individuals with back pay?
Conclusion
This decision fundamentally shaped modern labor law by extending the NLRA's protections Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua. Ut enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exercitation ullamco la
Legal Rule
Under § 8(3) of the National Labor Relations Act, it is an Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua. Ut enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exercitation ullamco laboris nisi ut aliquip ex ea commodo consequat. Duis aute irure dolor in reprehenderit in voluptate velit esse cillum dolore eu fugiat nulla paria
Legal Analysis
Justice Frankfurter, writing for the majority, adopted a purposive interpretation of the Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua. Ut enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exercitation ullamco laboris nisi ut aliquip ex ea commodo consequat. Duis aute irure dolor in reprehenderit in voluptate velit esse cillum dolore eu fugiat nulla pariatur. Excepteur sint occaecat cupidatat non proident, sunt in culpa qui officia deserunt mollit anim id est laborum. Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua. Ut enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exercitation ullamco laboris nisi ut aliquip ex ea commodo consequat. Duis aute irure dolor in reprehenderit in voluptate velit esse cillum dolore eu fugiat nulla pariatur. Excepteur sint occaecat cupidatat non proident, sunt in culpa qui officia deserunt mollit anim id est laborum. Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua. Ut enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exercitation ullamco laboris nisi ut aliquip ex ea commodo consequat. Duis aute irure dolor in reprehenderit in voluptate velit esse cillum dolore eu fugiat nulla pariatur. Excepteur sint occaecat cupidatat non proident, sunt in culpa qui officia deserunt mollit anim id est laborum. Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua. Ut enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exercitation ullamco laboris nisi ut aliquip ex ea commodo consequat. Duis aute irure dolor in reprehenderit in voluptate vel
Flash-to-Full Case Opinions
Flash Summary
- An employer’s refusal to hire job applicants because of their union