Perry-Rogers v. Fasano Case Brief
Complete case briefs with LSD+
Every LSD.Law brief pairs a full IRAC analysis with opinion summaries at three levels of depth, written by a team of Harvard Law and MIT graduates - a quick synopsis when you are pressed for time, the complete reasoning when you need to go deep.
Adaptive Case Views
Toggle between Flash, Standard, and Expanded. Get what you need, when you need it.
Exam-Ready IRAC Format
We deliver the precise structure professors look for in exam answers.
Complex Cases, Clarified
We break down dense legal reasoning into something digestible, helping you grasp core concepts.
Case Brief Summary & Legal Analysis
tl;dr: A fertility clinic mistakenly implanted a couple’s embryo into another woman. The court denied the gestational mother visitation rights, finding she lacked standing despite carrying the child to term, as the genetic parents intended to procreate.
Legal Significance: This case clarifies that in mistaken embryo implantations, genetic parents who intended to procreate are typically recognized as legal parents, and a gestational mother, aware of the error, generally lacks standing for visitation.
Case Facts & Court Holding
Key Facts & Case Background
Plaintiffs Deborah Perry-Rogers and Robert Rogers (the Rogerses) underwent in vitro fertilization. Their embryo was mistakenly implanted into defendant Donna Fasano, along with an embryo from Ms. Fasano and her husband. Both couples were notified of the error in May 1998. In December 1998, Ms. Fasano gave birth to two male infants, one white (biologically the Fasanos’) and one black. DNA testing confirmed the black child, Akeil, was the Rogerses’ genetic son. The Rogerses initiated legal action. To gain custody, Ms. Perry-Rogers signed an agreement granting the Fasanos visitation with Akeil, which included a liquidated damages clause. The Fasanos subsequently relinquished custody, and an order declared the Rogerses Akeil’s legal parents. However, the trial court later granted the Fasanos visitation based on the agreement and an oral order. The Rogerses appealed the visitation order, and the Fasanos appealed the custody order, challenging jurisdiction.
Court Holding & Legal Precedent
Issue: Does a gestational mother, who carried and delivered a child due to a mistaken embryo implantation and was aware of the mistake prenatally, have standing to seek court-ordered visitation with the child after the genetic parents have been awarded custody?
The Fasanos lack standing to seek visitation. The court reversed the visitation Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua. Ut enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exercitation ullamco laboris nisi ut aliquip ex ea commodo consequat. Duis aute irure dolor in reprehenderit in voluptate velit esse cillum dolore eu fugiat nulla pariatur. Excepteur sint occaecat cupidatat non proident, sunt in culpa qui officia deserunt mollit anim id est laborum. Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut
IRAC Legal Analysis
About IRAC analysis
IRAC (Issue, Rule, Analysis, Conclusion) is the structure professors expect in exam answers. Each LSD.Law brief states the issue, the governing rule with citations, the court's application of that rule, and the conclusion - the same reasoning pattern you will use on exams and in practice.
Legal Issue
Does a gestational mother, who carried and delivered a child due to a mistaken embryo implantation and was aware of the mistake prenatally, have standing to seek court-ordered visitation with the child after the genetic parents have been awarded custody?
Conclusion
This case establishes that in New York, in the context of a Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua. Ut enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exercitation ullamco laboris nisi ut aliquip ex ea commodo consequat. Duis aute irure dolor in reprehenderit in voluptate velit esse cillum dolore
Legal Rule
Under New York Domestic Relations Law §§ 70, 71, and 72, standing Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua. Ut enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exercitation ullamco laboris nisi ut aliquip ex ea commodo consequat. Duis aute irure dolor in reprehenderit in voluptate velit esse cillum dolore eu fugiat nulla pariatur. Excepteur sint occaecat cupidatat non proident, sunt in culpa qui officia deserunt mollit anim id e
Legal Analysis
The court distinguished this case from scenarios where a gestational mother might Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua. Ut enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exercitation ullamco laboris nisi ut aliquip ex ea commodo consequat. Duis aute irure dolor in reprehenderit in voluptate velit esse cillum dolore eu fugiat nulla pariatur. Excepteur sint occaecat cupidatat non proident, sunt in culpa qui officia deserunt mollit anim id est laborum. Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua. Ut enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exercitation ullamco laboris nisi ut aliquip ex ea commodo consequat. Duis aute irure dolor in reprehenderit in voluptate velit esse cillum dolore eu fugiat nulla pariatur. Excepteur sint occaecat cupidatat non proident, sunt in culpa qui officia deserunt mollit anim id est laborum. Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua. Ut enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exercitation ullamco laboris nisi ut aliquip ex ea commodo consequat. Duis aute irure dolor in reprehenderit in voluptate velit esse cillum dolore eu fugiat nulla pariatur. Excepteur sint occaecat cupidatat non proident, sunt in culpa qui officia des
Flash-to-Full Case Opinions
Flash Summary
- A gestational mother who carries a child due to a mistaken