Perfect 10, Inc. v. Visa International Service, Ass'n Case Brief

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit • 2007 • Docket #893377
494 F.3d 788 83 U.S.P.Q. 2d (BNA) 1144 2007 U.S. App. LEXIS 15824 2007 WL 1892885 Intellectual Property Internet Law Torts

Complete case briefs with LSD+

Every LSD.Law brief pairs a full IRAC analysis with opinion summaries at three levels of depth, written by a team of Harvard Law and MIT graduates - a quick synopsis when you are pressed for time, the complete reasoning when you need to go deep.

Adaptive Case Views

Toggle between Flash, Standard, and Expanded. Get what you need, when you need it.

Exam-Ready IRAC Format

We deliver the precise structure professors look for in exam answers.

Complex Cases, Clarified

We break down dense legal reasoning into something digestible, helping you grasp core concepts.

Case Brief Summary & Legal Analysis

3 min read

tl;dr: Credit card companies processed payments for websites selling stolen copyrighted images. The court held they were not secondarily liable for copyright infringement because providing payment services does not constitute material contribution to or direct control over the infringing activity itself.

Legal Significance: This case significantly limits the scope of secondary copyright liability for financial service providers, holding that merely facilitating payment for infringing goods, without more direct involvement in the infringement itself, is insufficient to establish contributory or vicarious liability.

Case Facts & Court Holding

Key Facts & Case Background

Perfect 10, Inc. (Perfect 10) owns copyrights to photographs of models. Numerous third-party websites stole these images and offered them for sale online. Perfect 10 sued Visa, MasterCard, and affiliated financial institutions (collectively, Defendants), alleging they were secondarily liable for copyright and trademark infringement. The core of the complaint was that Defendants continued to process credit card payments for these infringing websites even after Perfect 10 provided them with repeated, specific notices identifying the infringing sites and the illegal activity. Perfect 10 alleged that Defendants’ payment systems were essential for the commercial viability of these websites, as they provided the primary mechanism for consumers to purchase the stolen images. Perfect 10 argued that by providing this crucial financial service with knowledge of the infringement, Defendants were materially contributing to and profiting from the illegal conduct, and had the ability to stop it by terminating the websites’ merchant accounts pursuant to their own rules against servicing illegal businesses.

Court Holding & Legal Precedent

Issue: Does a financial institution that processes credit card payments for websites engaged in copyright infringement become secondarily liable for that infringement by knowingly providing its payment services?

No. The court affirmed the dismissal of Perfect 10’s claims, holding that Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua. Ut enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exercitation ullamco laboris nisi ut aliquip ex ea commodo co

Read the full analysis

The complete holding, rule, and analysis for this case are available to LSD+ subscribers.

Start 14-Day Free Trial

IRAC Legal Analysis

Premium Feature Unlock

About IRAC analysis

IRAC (Issue, Rule, Analysis, Conclusion) is the structure professors expect in exam answers. Each LSD.Law brief states the issue, the governing rule with citations, the court's application of that rule, and the conclusion - the same reasoning pattern you will use on exams and in practice.

Legal Issue

Does a financial institution that processes credit card payments for websites engaged in copyright infringement become secondarily liable for that infringement by knowingly providing its payment services?

Conclusion

This decision establishes a significant safe harbor for financial intermediaries, clarifying that Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua. Ut enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exercitation ullamco laboris nisi ut aliquip ex ea commodo consequat. Duis aute irure dolor in reprehenderit in volupt

Legal Rule

Contributory copyright infringement requires proof that a defendant (1) has knowledge of Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua. Ut enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exercitation ullamco laboris nisi ut aliquip ex ea commodo consequat. Duis aute irure dolor in reprehenderit in voluptate velit esse cillum dolore eu fugiat nulla pariatur. Excepteur sint occaeca

Legal Analysis

The court reasoned that Defendants did not materially contribute to the infringement Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua. Ut enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exercitation ullamco laboris nisi ut aliquip ex ea commodo consequat. Duis aute irure dolor in reprehenderit in voluptate velit esse cillum dolore eu fugiat nulla pariatur. Excepteur sint occaecat cupidatat non proident, sunt in culpa qui officia deserunt mollit anim id est laborum. Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua. Ut enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exercitation ullamco laboris nisi ut aliquip ex ea commodo consequat. Duis aute irure dolor in reprehenderit in voluptate velit esse cillum dolore eu fugiat nulla pariatur. Excepteur sint occaecat cupidatat non proident, sunt in culpa qui officia deserunt mollit anim id est laborum. Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua. Ut enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exercitation ullamco laboris nisi ut aliquip ex ea commodo consequat. Duis aute irure dolor in reprehenderit in voluptate velit esse cillum dolore eu fugiat nulla pariatur. Excepteur sint occaecat cupidatat non proident, sunt in culpa qui officia deserunt mollit anim id est laborum. Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua. Ut enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exercitation ullamco lab

Flash-to-Full Case Opinions

Flash Summary

  • Holding: Credit card companies are not secondarily liable for copyright or
Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua. Ut enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exercitation ullamco laboris nisi ut aliquip ex ea commodo consequat. Duis aute irure dolor in reprehenderit in voluptate velit esse cillum dolore eu fugiat nulla pariatur. Excepteur sint occaecat cupidatat non proident, sunt in culpa qui officia deserunt mollit anim id est laborum. Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna al

Read the full analysis

The complete holding, rule, and analysis for this case are available to LSD+ subscribers.

Start 14-Day Free Trial