OWENS v. CONTIGROUP COMPANIES, INC. Case Brief
Complete case briefs with LSD+
Every LSD.Law brief pairs a full IRAC analysis with opinion summaries at three levels of depth, written by a team of Harvard Law and MIT graduates - a quick synopsis when you are pressed for time, the complete reasoning when you need to go deep.
Adaptive Case Views
Toggle between Flash, Standard, and Expanded. Get what you need, when you need it.
Exam-Ready IRAC Format
We deliver the precise structure professors look for in exam answers.
Complex Cases, Clarified
We break down dense legal reasoning into something digestible, helping you grasp core concepts.
Case Brief Summary & Legal Analysis
tl;dr: Hog farm operators appealed a nuisance verdict, arguing non-economic damages were not recoverable for farmland. The court affirmed, holding loss of use and enjoyment damages are available for temporary nuisance affecting both residential and business (farm) property.
Legal Significance: Establishes that non-economic damages for loss of use and enjoyment in temporary nuisance cases are recoverable for property used for business purposes (e.g., farmland), not solely for residential property, even without proof of direct economic loss to the business itself.
Case Facts & Court Holding
Key Facts & Case Background
Respondents, fifteen individuals owning residential and farm properties in Gentry County, Missouri, sued ContiGroup Companies, Inc. (PSF) for temporary nuisance caused by PSF’s large-scale hog farming operations. The alleged nuisance stemmed from ill-smelling odors and other emissions emanating from the hog farms between 1999 and 2010, substantially impairing Respondents’ use and enjoyment of their properties. Respondents sought compensatory damages for this loss of use and enjoyment, not for diminution in property value. After a jury trial, Respondents were awarded significant compensatory damages. PSF appealed, arguing, inter alia, that Respondents failed to make a submissible case for damages related to their farmlands because they offered no evidence of economic damages specific to these “business” properties. PSF also challenged jury instructions, consolidation of claims, admission of expert testimony, and the excessiveness of the damage awards.
Court Holding & Legal Precedent
Issue: Does Missouri law permit recovery of non-economic compensatory damages for the loss of use and enjoyment of property used for business purposes (farmland) in a temporary nuisance action, absent proof of specific economic loss to that business property?
Yes, Missouri law allows property owners to recover non-economic compensatory damages for Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua. Ut enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exercitation ullamco laboris nisi ut aliquip ex ea commodo cons
IRAC Legal Analysis
About IRAC analysis
IRAC (Issue, Rule, Analysis, Conclusion) is the structure professors expect in exam answers. Each LSD.Law brief states the issue, the governing rule with citations, the court's application of that rule, and the conclusion - the same reasoning pattern you will use on exams and in practice.
Legal Issue
Does Missouri law permit recovery of non-economic compensatory damages for the loss of use and enjoyment of property used for business purposes (farmland) in a temporary nuisance action, absent proof of specific economic loss to that business property?
Conclusion
This case clarifies that in Missouri, temporary nuisance claims can support awards Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua. Ut enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exercitation ullamco laboris nisi ut aliquip ex ea commodo consequa
Legal Rule
The measure of damages for a temporary nuisance includes the decrease in Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua. Ut enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exercitation ullamco laboris nisi ut aliquip ex ea commodo consequat. Duis aute irure dolor in reprehenderit in voluptate velit esse cillum dolore eu fugiat nulla pariatur. Excepteur sint occaecat cupidatat non proident, sunt in culpa qui officia deserunt mollit anim id est laborum. Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, con
Legal Analysis
The court rejected PSF's contention that a rigid distinction exists between residential Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua. Ut enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exercitation ullamco laboris nisi ut aliquip ex ea commodo consequat. Duis aute irure dolor in reprehenderit in voluptate velit esse cillum dolore eu fugiat nulla pariatur. Excepteur sint occaecat cupidatat non proident, sunt in culpa qui officia deserunt mollit anim id est laborum. Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua. Ut enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exercitation ullamco laboris nisi ut aliquip ex ea commodo consequat. Duis aute irure dolor in reprehenderit in voluptate velit esse cillum dolore eu fugiat nulla pariatur. Excepteur sint occaecat cupidatat non proident, sunt in culpa qui officia deserunt mollit anim id est laborum. Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua. Ut enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exercitation ullamco laboris nisi ut aliquip ex ea commodo consequat. Duis aute irure dolor in reprehenderit in voluptate velit esse cillum dolore eu fugiat nulla pariatur. Excepteur sint occaecat cupidatat non proident, sunt in culpa qui officia deserunt mollit anim id est laborum. Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua. Ut enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exercitation ullamco laboris nisi ut aliquip ex ea commodo consequat. Duis aute irure dolor in reprehenderit in voluptate velit esse cillum dolore eu fugiat nulla pariatur. Excepteur sint occaecat cupidatat non proident, sunt in culpa qui officia deserunt mollit anim
Flash-to-Full Case Opinions
Flash Summary
- In a temporary nuisance case, Missouri law allows recovery of non-economic