Connection lost
Server error
National Wildlife Federation v. Burford Case Brief
Why Top Law Students (And Those Aspiring to Be) Use LSD+ Briefs
Let's be real, law school is a marathon. Our exclusive Flash-to-Full case system is designed by Harvard Law School and MIT grads to match your pace: Quick summaries when you're slammed, detailed analysis when you need to go deep. Only LSD+ offers this kind of flexibility to genuinely fit your study flow.
Adaptive Case Views
Toggle between Flash, Standard, and Expanded. Get what you need, when you need it.
Exam-Ready IRAC Format
We deliver the precise structure professors look for in exam answers.
Complex Cases, Clarified
We break down dense legal reasoning into something digestible, helping you grasp core concepts.
Case Brief Summary & Legal Analysis
tl;dr: An environmental group challenged the Secretary of the Interior’s sale of coal leases as being below fair market value. The court found the group had standing to sue but deferred to the agency, holding the Secretary’s valuation method was not arbitrary or capricious under the APA.
Legal Significance: This case illustrates the broad “zone of interests” test for standing under the APA, allowing environmental groups to sue based on intertwined economic and environmental harms. It also demonstrates the high deference courts give to agency technical determinations under the “arbitrary and capricious” standard.
National Wildlife Federation v. Burford Law School Study Guide
Use this case brief structure for your own legal analysis. Focus on the IRAC methodology to excel in law school exams and cold calls.
Case Facts & Court Holding
Key Facts & Case Background
The National Wildlife Federation (NWF) challenged the Department of the Interior’s (DOI) 1982 sale of federal coal leases in the Powder River Basin, suing under the Administrative Procedure Act (APA). NWF alleged the Secretary of the Interior violated the Federal Coal Leasing Amendments Act (FCLAA), 30 U.S.C. § 201(a)(1), by accepting bids below the coal’s fair market value (FMV). NWF, an organization whose members use the affected lands for recreation and other purposes, asserted two primary injuries to establish standing. First, an economic injury stemming from the fact that below-FMV sales would reduce revenue shared with the states under 30 U.S.C. § 191, thereby diminishing funds available to mitigate the social and economic impacts of coal mining. Second, an aesthetic and recreational injury, arguing that artificially low lease prices would spur more development than higher prices, harming members’ use and enjoyment of the area. On the merits, NWF challenged the Secretary’s shift from a “minimum acceptable bid” (MAB) system to an “entry level bid” (ELB) system, which was designed to stimulate competition in a declining coal market but which NWF claimed guaranteed receipt of less than FMV.
Court Holding & Legal Precedent
Issue: Does an environmental organization have standing to challenge federal coal lease sales as being below fair market value, and was the Secretary of the Interior’s determination of that value arbitrary and capricious under the Administrative Procedure Act?
Yes. The court held that NWF had standing to sue but affirmed Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua. Ut enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exercitation ullamco laboris nisi ut aliquip ex ea commodo consequat. Duis aute irure dolor in reprehenderit in voluptate velit esse cillum dolore eu fugiat nulla pariatur. Excepteur sint occaecat cupidatat non proident, sunt in culpa qui officia deserunt mollit anim id est laborum. Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmo
IRAC Legal Analysis
Complete IRAC Analysis for Higher Grades
IRAC (Issue, Rule, Analysis, Conclusion) is the exact format professors want to see in your exam answers. Our exclusive Flash-to-Full briefs combine holding, analysis, and rule statements formatted to match what A+ students produce in exams. These structured briefs help reinforce the essential legal reasoning patterns expected in law school.
Legal Issue
Does an environmental organization have standing to challenge federal coal lease sales as being below fair market value, and was the Secretary of the Interior’s determination of that value arbitrary and capricious under the Administrative Procedure Act?
Conclusion
The case affirms a broad interpretation of standing for environmental groups under Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua. Ut enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exercitation
Legal Rule
An organization has standing to challenge agency action under the APA if Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua. Ut enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exercitation ullamco laboris nisi ut aliquip ex ea commodo consequat. Duis aute irure dolor in reprehenderit in voluptate velit esse cillum dolore eu fugiat nulla pariatur. Excepteur sint occaecat cupidatat non proident, sunt in culpa qui officia deserunt mollit anim id est laborum. Lorem ipsum dolor si
Legal Analysis
The court conducted a two-part analysis, first addressing standing and then the Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua. Ut enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exercitation ullamco laboris nisi ut aliquip ex ea commodo consequat. Duis aute irure dolor in reprehenderit in voluptate velit esse cillum dolore eu fugiat nulla pariatur. Excepteur sint occaecat cupidatat non proident, sunt in culpa qui officia deserunt mollit anim id est laborum. Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua. Ut enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exercitation ullamco laboris nisi ut aliquip ex ea commodo consequat. Duis aute irure dolor in reprehenderit in voluptate velit esse cillum dolore eu fugiat nulla pariatur. Excepteur sint occaecat cupidatat non proident, sunt in culpa qui officia deserunt mollit anim id est laborum. Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua. Ut enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exercitation ullamco laboris nisi ut aliquip ex ea commodo consequat. Duis aute irure dolor in reprehenderit in voluptate velit esse cillum dolore eu fugiat nulla pariatur. Excepteur sint occaecat cupidatat non proident, sunt in culpa qui officia deserunt mollit anim id est laborum. Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua. Ut enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exercitation ullamco laboris ni
Flash-to-Full Case Opinions
Flash Summary
- An environmental group has standing to sue over below-market-value coal lease