National Labor Relations Board v. Washington Aluminum Co. Case Brief
Audio lesson available for this case
LSD+ subscribers can listen to a recorded discussion of this brief - the full facts, holding, and reasoning in audio form.
Complete case briefs with LSD+
Every LSD.Law brief pairs a full IRAC analysis with opinion summaries at three levels of depth, written by a team of Harvard Law and MIT graduates - a quick synopsis when you are pressed for time, the complete reasoning when you need to go deep.
Adaptive Case Views
Toggle between Flash, Standard, and Expanded. Get what you need, when you need it.
Exam-Ready IRAC Format
We deliver the precise structure professors look for in exam answers.
Complex Cases, Clarified
We break down dense legal reasoning into something digestible, helping you grasp core concepts.
Case Brief Summary & Legal Analysis
tl;dr: Non-union employees walked out due to extreme cold in their workplace and were fired. The Supreme Court held the walkout was protected concerted activity under the NLRA, even without a prior specific demand, making the discharges unlawful.
Legal Significance: Established that spontaneous work stoppages by unorganized employees protesting working conditions are protected “concerted activities” under NLRA §7, even without a specific demand, and their reasonableness is largely irrelevant to protection.
National Labor Relations Board v. Washington Aluminum Co. Law School Study Guide
Use this case brief structure for your own legal analysis. Focus on the IRAC methodology to excel in law school exams and cold calls.
Case Facts & Court Holding
Key Facts & Case Background
Seven unorganized machinists at Washington Aluminum Co. worked in an uninsulated shop with a frequently malfunctioning heating system. They had previously complained individually about the cold. On an extremely cold January day (11°F), with the main furnace broken, the shop was “bitterly cold.” The company’s foreman remarked that if the men “had any guts at all, they would go home.” After a brief discussion amongst themselves, sparked by the foreman’s comment and the conditions, seven of the eight machinists on the day shift walked out, hoping to prompt the company to improve heating. They did not present a specific demand to the employer before leaving. The company president, upon learning of the walkout, ordered their immediate termination for leaving work without permission, citing a plant rule. The National Labor Relations Board (NLRB) found the walkout was protected concerted activity under §7 of the National Labor Relations Act (NLRA) and the discharges constituted an unfair labor practice under §8(a)(1). The Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit refused to enforce the NLRB’s order, reasoning the walkout was not protected because no specific demand was made to the employer prior to the stoppage.
Court Holding & Legal Precedent
Issue: Is a spontaneous walkout by unorganized employees protesting adverse working conditions, without first making a specific demand on the employer, a “concerted activity” protected by Section 7 of the National Labor Relations Act, making their discharge for such action an unfair labor practice under Section 8(a)(1)?
Yes. The Supreme Court held that the employees’ walkout over cold working Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua. Ut enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exercitation ullamco laboris nisi ut aliquip ex ea commodo consequat. Duis aute irure dolor in reprehenderit in voluptate velit esse cillum dolore eu fugiat nulla pariatur. Excepteur sint occaecat cupidatat non proident, sunt in culpa qui officia deserunt mollit anim id est laborum. Lorem i
IRAC Legal Analysis
About IRAC analysis
IRAC (Issue, Rule, Analysis, Conclusion) is the structure professors expect in exam answers. Each LSD.Law brief states the issue, the governing rule with citations, the court's application of that rule, and the conclusion - the same reasoning pattern you will use on exams and in practice.
Legal Issue
Is a spontaneous walkout by unorganized employees protesting adverse working conditions, without first making a specific demand on the employer, a “concerted activity” protected by Section 7 of the National Labor Relations Act, making their discharge for such action an unfair labor practice under Section 8(a)(1)?
Conclusion
This landmark decision broadly interprets "concerted activities" under NLRA §7, affirming strong Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua. Ut enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exercitation ullamco laboris n
Legal Rule
Section 7 of the National Labor Relations Act (NLRA), 29 U.S.C. § Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua. Ut enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exercitation ullamco laboris nisi ut aliquip ex ea commodo consequat. Duis aute irure dolor in reprehenderit in voluptate velit esse cillum dolore eu fugiat nulla pariatur. Excepteur sint occaecat cupidatat non proident, sunt in culpa qui officia deserunt mollit anim id est laborum. Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua. Ut enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exercitation ullamco laboris nisi ut aliquip ex ea commodo consequat. Duis aute irure dolor in reprehenderit in voluptate veli
Legal Analysis
The Supreme Court reversed the Court of Appeals, emphasizing the breadth of Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua. Ut enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exercitation ullamco laboris nisi ut aliquip ex ea commodo consequat. Duis aute irure dolor in reprehenderit in voluptate velit esse cillum dolore eu fugiat nulla pariatur. Excepteur sint occaecat cupidatat non proident, sunt in culpa qui officia deserunt mollit anim id est laborum. Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua. Ut enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exercitation ullamco laboris nisi ut aliquip ex ea commodo consequat. Duis aute irure dolor in reprehenderit in voluptate velit esse cillum dolore eu fugiat nulla pariatur. Excepteur sint occaecat cupidatat non proident, sunt in culpa qui officia deserunt mollit anim id est laborum. Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua. Ut enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exercitation ullamco laboris nisi ut aliquip ex ea commodo consequat. Duis aute irure dolor in reprehenderit in voluptate velit esse cillum dolore eu fugiat nulla pariatur. Excepteur sint occaecat cupidatat non proident, sunt in culpa qui officia deserunt mollit anim id est laborum. Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua. Ut enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exercitation ullamco laboris nisi ut aliquip ex ea commodo consequat. Duis aute irure dolor in reprehenderit in voluptate velit esse cillum dolore eu fugiat nulla pariatur. Excepteur sint occaecat cupidatat non proident, sunt in culpa qui officia deserunt mollit anim id est la
Flash-to-Full Case Opinions
Flash Summary
- A spontaneous employee walkout over cold working conditions is protected “concerted