Morehead v. New York Ex Rel. Tipaldo Case Brief
Complete case briefs with LSD+
Every LSD.Law brief pairs a full IRAC analysis with opinion summaries at three levels of depth, written by a team of Harvard Law and MIT graduates - a quick synopsis when you are pressed for time, the complete reasoning when you need to go deep.
Adaptive Case Views
Toggle between Flash, Standard, and Expanded. Get what you need, when you need it.
Exam-Ready IRAC Format
We deliver the precise structure professors look for in exam answers.
Complex Cases, Clarified
We break down dense legal reasoning into something digestible, helping you grasp core concepts.
Case Brief Summary & Legal Analysis
tl;dr: The Supreme Court struck down a New York minimum wage law for women, holding that it violated the “liberty of contract” protected by the Fourteenth Amendment’s Due Process Clause, reaffirming the precedent set in Adkins v. Children’s Hospital.
Legal Significance: This case represents the high-water mark of the Lochner era’s substantive due process doctrine protecting freedom of contract from economic regulation. It was famously overruled just one year later in West Coast Hotel Co. v. Parrish.
Case Facts & Court Holding
Key Facts & Case Background
New York enacted a minimum wage law applicable to adult women and minors, authorizing a state commissioner to establish “minimum fair wage rates.” The statute defined an “oppressive and unreasonable wage” as one that was “both less than the fair and reasonable value of the services rendered and less than sufficient to meet the minimum cost of living necessary for health.” Joseph Tipaldo, the manager of a laundry, was indicted for violating a mandatory order under the law by paying his adult female employees less than the prescribed minimum wage. Tipaldo filed a petition for a writ of habeas corpus, arguing the statute was repugnant to the Due Process Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment because it unconstitutionally interfered with his and his employees’ freedom of contract. The New York Court of Appeals agreed, finding the law materially indistinguishable from the District of Columbia statute struck down by the Supreme Court in Adkins v. Children’s Hospital. The Supreme Court granted certiorari.
Court Holding & Legal Precedent
Issue: Does a state law authorizing the establishment of minimum wages for adult women, based on both the fair value of services and the minimum cost of living, violate the liberty of contract protected by the Due Process Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment?
Yes. The Court affirmed the judgment of the New York Court of Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua. Ut enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exercitation ullamco laboris nisi ut aliquip ex ea commodo consequat. Duis aute irure dolor in reprehenderit in voluptate velit esse cillum dolore eu fugiat nulla pariatur. Excepteur sint occaecat cupidatat non proident, sunt in culpa qui officia deserunt mollit anim id est laborum. Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna
IRAC Legal Analysis
About IRAC analysis
IRAC (Issue, Rule, Analysis, Conclusion) is the structure professors expect in exam answers. Each LSD.Law brief states the issue, the governing rule with citations, the court's application of that rule, and the conclusion - the same reasoning pattern you will use on exams and in practice.
Legal Issue
Does a state law authorizing the establishment of minimum wages for adult women, based on both the fair value of services and the minimum cost of living, violate the liberty of contract protected by the Due Process Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment?
Conclusion
This decision marked the final reaffirmation of the *Lochner* era's "liberty of Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua. Ut enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exercitation ullamco laboris nisi ut aliquip ex ea commodo conseq
Legal Rule
The Due Process Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment protects freedom of contract, Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua. Ut enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exercitation ullamco laboris nisi ut aliquip ex ea commodo consequat. Duis aute irure dolor in reprehenderit
Legal Analysis
The majority opinion, authored by Justice Butler, strictly adhered to the precedent Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua. Ut enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exercitation ullamco laboris nisi ut aliquip ex ea commodo consequat. Duis aute irure dolor in reprehenderit in voluptate velit esse cillum dolore eu fugiat nulla pariatur. Excepteur sint occaecat cupidatat non proident, sunt in culpa qui officia deserunt mollit anim id est laborum. Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua. Ut enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exercitation ullamco laboris nisi ut aliquip ex ea commodo consequat. Duis aute irure dolor in reprehenderit in voluptate velit esse cillum dolore eu fugiat nulla pariatur. Excepteur sint occaecat cupidatat non proident, sunt in culpa qui officia deserunt mollit anim id est laborum. Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua. Ut enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exercitation ullamco laboris nisi ut aliquip ex ea commodo consequat. Duis aute irure dolor in reprehenderit in voluptate velit esse cillum dolore eu fugiat nulla par
Flash-to-Full Case Opinions
Flash Summary
- Held that a New York minimum wage law for women violated