Matter of Breen Case Brief

Arizona Supreme Court1992Docket #563782
830 P.2d 462 171 Ariz. 250 110 Ariz. Adv. Rep. 65 1992 Ariz. LEXIS 30 Professional Responsibility Agency

Complete case briefs with LSD+

Every LSD.Law brief pairs a full IRAC analysis with opinion summaries at three levels of depth, written by a team of Harvard Law and MIT graduates - a quick synopsis when you are pressed for time, the complete reasoning when you need to go deep.

Adaptive Case Views

Toggle between Flash, Standard, and Expanded. Get what you need, when you need it.

Exam-Ready IRAC Format

We deliver the precise structure professors look for in exam answers.

Complex Cases, Clarified

We break down dense legal reasoning into something digestible, helping you grasp core concepts.

Case Brief Summary & Legal Analysis

4 min read

tl;dr: An attorney engaged in multiple business transactions with clients, creating severe conflicts of interest. The court found numerous ethical violations, emphasizing that an attorney’s high fiduciary duty persists even in business dealings, and suspended the attorney for two years.

Legal Significance: Establishes that an attorney’s fiduciary duties and ethical obligations apply in business transactions with clients, even when not providing legal advice. Full disclosure in such transactions requires advising the client to seek independent counsel and explaining all risks.

Matter of Breen Law School Study Guide

Use this case brief structure for your own legal analysis. Focus on the IRAC methodology to excel in law school exams and cold calls.

Case Facts & Court Holding

Key Facts & Case Background

Attorney Dennis Breen engaged in a series of business transactions with a married couple he represented, leading to multiple ethical violations. First, Breen formed a corporation, Hubbell, for the clients, and became a shareholder and officer himself without fully disclosing the potential conflicts. He then arranged a $75,000 loan from Hubbell to another of his clients, C & T Air Conditioning, without disclosing his dual representation. Breen misrepresented to the Hubbell clients that the loan’s security was a second-position deed of trust when it was actually in a third position. Later, after the clients terminated his representation, Breen represented a borrower, Macy, in a bankruptcy filing for the express purpose of preventing his former clients from foreclosing on a property that secured a loan from Hubbell. Finally, acting as an investment broker, Breen urged the clients to invest in high-risk oil ventures from which he received a commission. Breen failed to conduct basic due diligence on these ventures, such as obtaining competitive bids or investigating the managers’ lack of experience.

Court Holding & Legal Precedent

Issue: Does an attorney violate their ethical duties when entering into business transactions with a client, representing clients with adverse interests, and subsequently representing a new client against a former client in a substantially related matter, all without making full disclosure and obtaining informed consent?

Yes. The attorney’s conduct constituted multiple violations of his ethical duties. The Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua. Ut enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exercitation ullamco laboris nisi ut aliquip ex ea commodo consequat. Duis aute irure dolor in reprehenderit in

Read the full analysis

The complete holding, rule, and analysis for this case are available to LSD+ subscribers.

Start 14-Day Free Trial

IRAC Legal Analysis

Premium Feature Unlock

About IRAC analysis

IRAC (Issue, Rule, Analysis, Conclusion) is the structure professors expect in exam answers. Each LSD.Law brief states the issue, the governing rule with citations, the court's application of that rule, and the conclusion - the same reasoning pattern you will use on exams and in practice.

Legal Issue

Does an attorney violate their ethical duties when entering into business transactions with a client, representing clients with adverse interests, and subsequently representing a new client against a former client in a substantially related matter, all without making full disclosure and obtaining informed consent?

Conclusion

This case is a foundational precedent defining the stringent scope of an Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua. Ut enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exercitation ull

Legal Rule

Under the Arizona Code of Professional Responsibility, an attorney shall not enter Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua. Ut enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exercitation ullamco laboris nisi ut aliquip ex ea commodo consequat. Duis aute irure dolor in reprehenderit in voluptate velit esse cillum dolore eu fugiat nulla pariatur. Excepteur sint occaecat cupidatat non proident, sunt in culpa qui officia deserunt mo

Legal Analysis

The Arizona Supreme Court found clear and convincing evidence supporting the disciplinary Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua. Ut enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exercitation ullamco laboris nisi ut aliquip ex ea commodo consequat. Duis aute irure dolor in reprehenderit in voluptate velit esse cillum dolore eu fugiat nulla pariatur. Excepteur sint occaecat cupidatat non proident, sunt in culpa qui officia deserunt mollit anim id est laborum. Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua. Ut enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exercitation ullamco laboris nisi ut aliquip ex ea commodo consequat. Duis aute irure dolor in reprehenderit in voluptate velit esse cillum dolore eu fugiat nulla pariatur. Excepteur sint occaecat cupidatat non proident, sunt in culpa qui officia deserunt mollit anim id est laborum. Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua. Ut enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exercitation ullamco laboris nisi ut aliquip ex ea commodo consequat. Duis aute irure dolor in reprehenderit in voluptate velit esse cillum dolore eu fugiat nulla pariatur. Excepteur sint occaecat cupidatat non proident, sunt in culpa qui officia deserunt mollit anim id est laborum. Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et

Flash-to-Full Case Opinions

Flash Summary

  • Attorney suspended for two years for engaging in multiple business transactions
Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua. Ut enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exercitation ullamco laboris nisi ut aliquip ex ea commodo consequat. Duis aute irure dolor in reprehenderit in voluptate velit esse cillum dolore eu fugiat nulla pariatur. Excepteur sint occaecat cupidatat non proident, su

Read the full analysis

The complete holding, rule, and analysis for this case are available to LSD+ subscribers.

Start 14-Day Free Trial