Marriage of Brebaugh v. Deane Case Brief
Complete case briefs with LSD+
Every LSD.Law brief pairs a full IRAC analysis with opinion summaries at three levels of depth, written by a team of Harvard Law and MIT graduates - a quick synopsis when you are pressed for time, the complete reasoning when you need to go deep.
Adaptive Case Views
Toggle between Flash, Standard, and Expanded. Get what you need, when you need it.
Exam-Ready IRAC Format
We deliver the precise structure professors look for in exam answers.
Complex Cases, Clarified
We break down dense legal reasoning into something digestible, helping you grasp core concepts.
Case Brief Summary & Legal Analysis
tl;dr: In a divorce, an Arizona court ruled that unvested stock options are not automatically community property. The case was remanded for the trial court to determine the employer’s intent for the grant (past reward vs. future incentive) and apply a time-rule formula to apportion the asset.
Legal Significance: This case establishes the Arizona framework for dividing unvested stock options in a dissolution. It mandates an inquiry into the employer’s intent and adopts the use of time-rule formulas, such as the Hug and Nelson formulas, to apportion community and separate property interests.
Marriage of Brebaugh v. Deane Law School Study Guide
Use this case brief structure for your own legal analysis. Focus on the IRAC methodology to excel in law school exams and cold calls.
Case Facts & Court Holding
Key Facts & Case Background
William Brebaugh (“Husband”) and Nancy Deane (“Wife”) divorced after thirty years of marriage. During the marriage, Husband’s employer, Apollo Group, Inc., granted him blocks of stock options. The parties disputed the characterization of options that were granted during the marriage but were not scheduled to vest until after the date the dissolution petition was served. The stock option agreements stated their purpose was to encourage key employees to remain with the company and to provide a proprietary interest in its success. Vesting occurred annually over four years but could be accelerated if the company met certain performance goals. Husband argued the unvested options were an incentive for his future performance and thus his separate property. Wife argued they were deferred compensation for past marital efforts and thus entirely community property. The trial court, finding Husband had failed to rebut the community property presumption by clear and convincing evidence, characterized all the disputed options as community property and awarded Wife one-half.
Court Holding & Legal Precedent
Issue: How should unvested stock options, granted during a marriage but vesting after the service of a dissolution petition, be characterized and divided under Arizona’s community property law?
The court reversed the trial court’s characterization of the unvested stock options Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua. Ut enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exercitation ullamco laboris nisi ut aliquip ex ea commodo consequat. Duis aute irure dolor in reprehenderit
IRAC Legal Analysis
About IRAC analysis
IRAC (Issue, Rule, Analysis, Conclusion) is the structure professors expect in exam answers. Each LSD.Law brief states the issue, the governing rule with citations, the court's application of that rule, and the conclusion - the same reasoning pattern you will use on exams and in practice.
Legal Issue
How should unvested stock options, granted during a marriage but vesting after the service of a dissolution petition, be characterized and divided under Arizona’s community property law?
Conclusion
This decision aligns Arizona with the majority of community property states by Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua. Ut enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exercitation ullamco laboris nisi ut aliquip ex ea commodo consequat. Duis aute irure dolor in
Legal Rule
Unvested stock options granted during a marriage are analogous to unvested pension Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua. Ut enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exercitation ullamco laboris nisi ut aliquip ex ea commodo consequat. Duis aute irure dolor in reprehenderit in voluptate velit esse cillum dolore eu fugiat nulla pariatur. Excepteur sint occaecat cupidatat non proident, sunt in culpa qui officia deserunt mollit anim id est labo
Legal Analysis
The court began with the presumption that property acquired during marriage is Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua. Ut enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exercitation ullamco laboris nisi ut aliquip ex ea commodo consequat. Duis aute irure dolor in reprehenderit in voluptate velit esse cillum dolore eu fugiat nulla pariatur. Excepteur sint occaecat cupidatat non proident, sunt in culpa qui officia deserunt mollit anim id est laborum. Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua. Ut enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exercitation ullamco laboris nisi ut aliquip ex ea commodo consequat. Duis aute irure dolor in reprehenderit in voluptate velit esse cillum dolore eu fugiat nulla pariatur. Excepteur sint occaecat cupidatat non proident, sunt in culpa qui officia deserunt mollit anim id est laborum. Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua. Ut enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exercitation ullamco laboris nisi ut aliquip ex ea commodo consequat. Duis aute irure dolor in reprehenderit in voluptate velit esse cillum dolore eu fugiat nulla pariatur. Excepteur sint occaecat cupidatat non proident, sunt in culpa qui officia deserunt mollit anim id est laborum. Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua. Ut enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exercitation ullamco laboris n
Flash-to-Full Case Opinions
Flash Summary
- Unvested stock options granted during marriage are analogous to unvested pensions