Lohmeyer v. Bower Case Brief
Complete case briefs with LSD+
Every LSD.Law brief pairs a full IRAC analysis with opinion summaries at three levels of depth, written by a team of Harvard Law and MIT graduates - a quick synopsis when you are pressed for time, the complete reasoning when you need to go deep.
Adaptive Case Views
Toggle between Flash, Standard, and Expanded. Get what you need, when you need it.
Exam-Ready IRAC Format
We deliver the precise structure professors look for in exam answers.
Complex Cases, Clarified
We break down dense legal reasoning into something digestible, helping you grasp core concepts.
Case Brief Summary & Legal Analysis
tl;dr: Buyer sought to rescind a real estate contract because the house violated a city ordinance and a restrictive covenant. The court agreed, finding the title unmerchantable due to these existing violations, which exposed the buyer to potential litigation.
Legal Significance: Establishes that existing violations of zoning ordinances or restrictive covenants, not merely their existence, can render title unmerchantable, even if the contract acknowledges restrictions of record, due to the risk of litigation.
Lohmeyer v. Bower Law School Study Guide
Use this case brief structure for your own legal analysis. Focus on the IRAC methodology to excel in law school exams and cold calls.
Case Facts & Court Holding
Key Facts & Case Background
Plaintiff Lohmeyer contracted to purchase Lot 37 in Berkley Hills Addition from defendants Bower. The contract stipulated conveyance by warranty deed with an abstract showing “good merchantable title… free and clear of all encumbrances except special taxes subject, however, to all restrictions and easements of record applying to this property.” After signing, Lohmeyer discovered two issues: (1) the house on the lot was located approximately 18 inches from the north lot line, violating Section 5-224 of the Ordinances of the City of Emporia, which required a minimum 3-foot setback for frame buildings; and (2) the house was a one-story dwelling, whereas the recorded dedication restrictions for the Berkley Hills Addition required that any residence erected on Lot 37 be a two-story house. Lohmeyer, who was unaware of these violations when he entered the contract, notified the Bowers and demanded to be released from the agreement, asserting the title was unmerchantable. The Bowers contested rescission and sought specific performance. They argued, inter alia, that the dedication restrictions were extinguished by a prior tax foreclosure sale and that the ordinance was either repealed or inapplicable due to a permit issued to move the house onto the lot. The Bowers also offered to purchase and convey an additional two feet of land to cure the setback violation, an offer Lohmeyer refused.
Court Holding & Legal Precedent
Issue: Do existing violations of a municipal zoning ordinance and a private restrictive covenant, which expose the purchaser to the hazard of litigation, render title to real property unmerchantable and justify rescission of the purchase contract, even if the contract states the property is subject to all restrictions of record?
Yes, the existing violations of both the city ordinance (setback requirement) and Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua. Ut enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exercitation ullamco laboris nisi ut aliquip ex ea commodo consequat. Duis aute irure dolor in reprehenderit in voluptate velit esse cillum dolore eu fugiat nulla pariatur. Excepteur sint occaecat cupidatat non proident, sunt in c
IRAC Legal Analysis
About IRAC analysis
IRAC (Issue, Rule, Analysis, Conclusion) is the structure professors expect in exam answers. Each LSD.Law brief states the issue, the governing rule with citations, the court's application of that rule, and the conclusion - the same reasoning pattern you will use on exams and in practice.
Legal Issue
Do existing violations of a municipal zoning ordinance and a private restrictive covenant, which expose the purchaser to the hazard of litigation, render title to real property unmerchantable and justify rescission of the purchase contract, even if the contract states the property is subject to all restrictions of record?
Conclusion
This case significantly clarifies that active violations of land use regulations or Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua. Ut enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exercitation ullamco laboris nisi ut aliquip ex ea commodo consequat. Duis aute irure dolor in reprehenderit in
Legal Rule
A marketable title to real estate is one which is free from Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua. Ut enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exercitation ullamco laboris nisi ut aliquip ex ea commodo consequat. Duis aute irure dolor in reprehenderit in voluptate velit esse cillum dolore eu fugiat nulla pariatur. Excepteur sint occaecat cupidatat non proident, sunt in culpa qui officia deserunt moll
Legal Analysis
The court determined that the title was unmerchantable because the existing violations Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua. Ut enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exercitation ullamco laboris nisi ut aliquip ex ea commodo consequat. Duis aute irure dolor in reprehenderit in voluptate velit esse cillum dolore eu fugiat nulla pariatur. Excepteur sint occaecat cupidatat non proident, sunt in culpa qui officia deserunt mollit anim id est laborum. Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua. Ut enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exercitation ullamco laboris nisi ut aliquip ex ea commodo consequat. Duis aute irure dolor in reprehenderit in voluptate velit esse cillum dolore eu fugiat nulla pariatur. Excepteur sint occaecat cupidatat non proident, sunt in culpa qui officia deserunt mollit anim id est laborum. Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua. Ut enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exercitation ullamco laboris nisi ut aliquip ex ea commodo consequat. Duis aute irure dolor in reprehenderit in voluptate velit esse cillum dolore eu fugiat nulla pariatur. Excepteur sint occaecat cupidatat non proident, sunt in culpa qui officia deserunt mollit anim id est laborum. Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua. Ut enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exercitation ullamco laboris nisi ut aliquip ex ea commodo consequat. Duis aute irure dolor in reprehenderit in voluptate velit esse cillum dolore eu fugiat nulla pariatur. Excepteur sint
Flash-to-Full Case Opinions
Flash Summary
- A title is unmerchantable if it is not free from reasonable