Lochner v. New York Case Brief
Complete case briefs with LSD+
Every LSD.Law brief pairs a full IRAC analysis with opinion summaries at three levels of depth, written by a team of Harvard Law and MIT graduates - a quick synopsis when you are pressed for time, the complete reasoning when you need to go deep.
Adaptive Case Views
Toggle between Flash, Standard, and Expanded. Get what you need, when you need it.
Exam-Ready IRAC Format
We deliver the precise structure professors look for in exam answers.
Complex Cases, Clarified
We break down dense legal reasoning into something digestible, helping you grasp core concepts.
tl;dr: The Supreme Court struck down a New York law limiting bakers’ work hours, holding that it violated the “liberty of contract” protected by the Fourteenth Amendment’s Due Process Clause and was not a legitimate exercise of state police power.
Legal Significance: This case is the namesake of the “Lochner era,” a period where the Supreme Court used substantive due process to invalidate economic regulations. It represents a high-water mark for the “liberty of contract” doctrine and judicial activism in economic matters.
Case Facts & Court Holding
Key Facts & Case Background
The State of New York enacted the Bakeshop Act of 1897, a labor law that, among other provisions, prohibited employers from requiring or permitting employees in bakeries or confectionery establishments to work more than 60 hours in one week or more than 10 hours in one day. Joseph Lochner, the owner of a bakery in Utica, New York, was indicted and convicted for violating this statute by permitting an employee to work more than 60 hours in one week. Lochner challenged his conviction, arguing that the New York law was unconstitutional. He contended that the statute interfered with the freedom of contract between employer and employee, a right protected as part of the “liberty” guaranteed by the Due Process Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment. The New York courts upheld the conviction, reasoning that the law was a valid exercise of the state’s police power to protect the health of bakery workers. The case was appealed to the Supreme Court of the United States to determine the constitutionality of the state’s economic regulation.
Court Holding & Legal Precedent
Issue: Does a state law limiting the working hours of bakery employees constitute an arbitrary interference with the liberty of contract protected by the Due Process Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment, or is it a valid exercise of the state’s police power?
Yes. The Court held that the New York law was an unconstitutional Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua. Ut enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exercitation ullamco laboris nisi ut aliquip ex ea commodo consequat. Duis aute irure dolor in reprehenderit in voluptate velit esse cillum dolore eu fugiat nulla pariatur. Excepteur sint occaecat cupidatat non proident, sunt in culpa qui officia
IRAC Legal Analysis
About IRAC analysis
IRAC (Issue, Rule, Analysis, Conclusion) is the structure professors expect in exam answers. Each LSD.Law brief states the issue, the governing rule with citations, the court's application of that rule, and the conclusion - the same reasoning pattern you will use on exams and in practice.
Legal Issue
Does a state law limiting the working hours of bakery employees constitute an arbitrary interference with the liberty of contract protected by the Due Process Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment, or is it a valid exercise of the state’s police power?
Conclusion
Lochner v. New York established the "liberty of contract" as a fundamental Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua. Ut enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exercitation ullamco laboris nisi ut aliquip ex ea commodo consequat. Duis aute irure dolor in reprehenderit in voluptate velit esse cillum d
Legal Rule
The general right to make a contract in relation to one's business Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua. Ut enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exercitation ullamco laboris nisi ut aliquip ex ea commodo consequat. Duis aute irure dolor in reprehenderit in voluptate velit esse cillum dolore eu fugiat nulla pariatur. Excepteur sint occaecat cupidatat non proident, sunt in culpa qui officia
Legal Analysis
The majority, led by Justice Peckham, established that the "liberty of contract" Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua. Ut enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exercitation ullamco laboris nisi ut aliquip ex ea commodo consequat. Duis aute irure dolor in reprehenderit in voluptate velit esse cillum dolore eu fugiat nulla pariatur. Excepteur sint occaecat cupidatat non proident, sunt in culpa qui officia deserunt mollit anim id est laborum. Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua. Ut enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exercitation ullamco laboris nisi ut aliquip ex ea commodo consequat. Duis aute irure dolor in reprehenderit in voluptate velit esse cillum dolore eu fugiat nulla pariatur. Excepteur sint occaecat cupidatat non proident, sunt in culpa qui officia deserunt mollit anim id est laborum. Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua. Ut enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exercitation ullamco laboris nisi ut aliquip ex ea commodo consequat. Duis aute irure dolor in reprehenderit in voluptate velit esse cillum dolore eu fugiat nulla pariatur. Excepteur sint occaecat cupidatat non proident, sunt in culpa qui officia deserunt mollit anim id est laborum. Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua. Ut enim ad minim veni
Flash-to-Full Case Opinions
Flash Summary
- The Supreme Court struck down a New York law limiting bakers’