Kraft, Inc. v. Federal Trade Commission Case Brief
Complete case briefs with LSD+
Every LSD.Law brief pairs a full IRAC analysis with opinion summaries at three levels of depth, written by a team of Harvard Law and MIT graduates - a quick synopsis when you are pressed for time, the complete reasoning when you need to go deep.
Adaptive Case Views
Toggle between Flash, Standard, and Expanded. Get what you need, when you need it.
Exam-Ready IRAC Format
We deliver the precise structure professors look for in exam answers.
Complex Cases, Clarified
We break down dense legal reasoning into something digestible, helping you grasp core concepts.
Case Brief Summary & Legal Analysis
tl;dr: The FTC found Kraft’s cheese ads deceptively implied false calcium claims. The court upheld the FTC’s order, affirming that an agency can find an ad misleading based on its own analysis without consumer surveys, so long as the implied claim is reasonably clear.
Legal Significance: This case affirms the FTC’s authority to find advertisements implicitly deceptive without extrinsic evidence, provided the implied claim is reasonably clear from the ad’s face. It reinforces a deferential standard of review for the FTC’s factual findings, even when commercial speech is implicated.
Kraft, Inc. v. Federal Trade Commission Law School Study Guide
Use this case brief structure for your own legal analysis. Focus on the IRAC methodology to excel in law school exams and cold calls.
Case Facts & Court Holding
Key Facts & Case Background
Kraft, Inc. launched an advertising campaign for its Kraft Singles cheese slices, known as the “Five Ounces of Milk” campaign. The ads stated that each slice was made from five ounces of milk and was high in calcium. The Federal Trade Commission (FTC) filed a complaint, alleging the ads made two false implied claims: (1) that a slice of Singles contains the same amount of calcium as five ounces of milk (the “milk equivalency” claim), and (2) that Singles contain more calcium than most imitation cheese slices (the “imitation superiority” claim). In reality, about 30% of the milk’s calcium is lost during processing, and most imitation slices are fortified to contain a similar amount of calcium as Singles. The FTC, relying primarily on its own interpretation of the ads’ “overall net impression” rather than extrinsic consumer survey evidence, found the ads deceptive. It issued a broad cease and desist order covering all of Kraft’s cheese products. Kraft petitioned for review, arguing the FTC was required to use extrinsic evidence and that its findings were not supported by substantial evidence.
Court Holding & Legal Precedent
Issue: May the Federal Trade Commission, without relying on extrinsic evidence such as consumer surveys, determine that an advertisement makes a deceptive implied claim that is reasonably clear from the face of the advertisement?
Yes. The court affirmed the FTC’s order, holding that the Commission is Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua. Ut enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exercitation ullamco laboris nisi ut aliquip ex ea commodo consequat. Duis aute irure dolor in reprehenderit in voluptate velit esse ci
IRAC Legal Analysis
About IRAC analysis
IRAC (Issue, Rule, Analysis, Conclusion) is the structure professors expect in exam answers. Each LSD.Law brief states the issue, the governing rule with citations, the court's application of that rule, and the conclusion - the same reasoning pattern you will use on exams and in practice.
Legal Issue
May the Federal Trade Commission, without relying on extrinsic evidence such as consumer surveys, determine that an advertisement makes a deceptive implied claim that is reasonably clear from the face of the advertisement?
Conclusion
The case solidifies the FTC's authority and procedural latitude in policing deceptive Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua. Ut enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exercitation ullamco laboris nisi ut aliquip ex ea commodo consequat. Duis aute ir
Legal Rule
The Federal Trade Commission may rely on its own reasoned analysis to Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua. Ut enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exercitation ullamco laboris nisi ut aliquip ex ea commodo consequat. Duis aute irure dolor in reprehenderit in voluptate velit esse cillum dolore eu fug
Legal Analysis
The Seventh Circuit rejected Kraft's argument for a de novo standard of Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua. Ut enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exercitation ullamco laboris nisi ut aliquip ex ea commodo consequat. Duis aute irure dolor in reprehenderit in voluptate velit esse cillum dolore eu fugiat nulla pariatur. Excepteur sint occaecat cupidatat non proident, sunt in culpa qui officia deserunt mollit anim id est laborum. Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua. Ut enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exercitation ullamco laboris nisi ut aliquip ex ea commodo consequat. Duis aute irure dolor in reprehenderit in voluptate velit esse cillum dolore eu fugiat nulla pariatur. Excepteur sint occaecat cupidatat non proident, sunt in culpa qui officia deserunt mollit anim id est laborum. Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua. Ut enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exercitation ullamco laboris nisi ut aliquip ex ea commodo consequat. Duis aute irure dolor in reprehenderit in voluptate velit esse cillum dolore eu fugiat nulla pariatur. Excepteur sint occaecat cupidatat non proident, sunt in culpa qui officia deserunt mollit anim id est laborum. Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua. Ut enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exercitation ullamco laboris nisi ut aliquip ex ea commodo consequat. Duis aute irure dolor in reprehende
Flash-to-Full Case Opinions
Flash Summary
- The FTC can find an advertisement makes a misleading implied claim