Korematsu v. United States Case Brief
Complete case briefs with LSD+
Every LSD.Law brief pairs a full IRAC analysis with opinion summaries at three levels of depth, written by a team of Harvard Law and MIT graduates - a quick synopsis when you are pressed for time, the complete reasoning when you need to go deep.
Adaptive Case Views
Toggle between Flash, Standard, and Expanded. Get what you need, when you need it.
Exam-Ready IRAC Format
We deliver the precise structure professors look for in exam answers.
Complex Cases, Clarified
We break down dense legal reasoning into something digestible, helping you grasp core concepts.
Case Brief Summary & Legal Analysis
tl;dr: Forty years after his conviction for violating a WWII Japanese-American exclusion order, Korematsu sought to have it vacated. The court granted a writ of coram nobis, finding the government had knowingly suppressed crucial evidence that contradicted the military necessity rationale for the exclusion.
Legal Significance: This case revitalized the writ of coram nobis as a post-conviction remedy for fundamental injustices where the petitioner is no longer in custody. It also serves as a judicial acknowledgment of the governmental misconduct that underpinned the infamous 1944 Supreme Court decision.
Case Facts & Court Holding
Key Facts & Case Background
In 1942, Fred Korematsu was convicted for violating Civilian Exclusion Order No. 34, which barred persons of Japanese ancestry from certain West Coast military areas. The Supreme Court affirmed his conviction in 1944, deferring to the government’s claim of military necessity. In 1983, Korematsu petitioned for a writ of coram nobis to vacate the conviction, presenting newly discovered evidence of governmental misconduct. This evidence included a congressional commission report and internal Department of Justice memoranda from the 1940s. The documents revealed that government officials knew the military’s report justifying the exclusion contained “intentional falsehoods” and that intelligence from the FBI and FCC directly contradicted claims of espionage by Japanese Americans. This contrary evidence was knowingly withheld from the courts during the original proceedings. The government did not oppose vacating the conviction but moved to simply dismiss the indictment under Fed. R. Crim. P. 48(a), a move the court rejected. Because Korematsu had long since served his sentence, he could not meet the “in custody” requirement for habeas corpus relief.
Court Holding & Legal Precedent
Issue: May a district court grant a writ of coram nobis to vacate a long-standing conviction where the petitioner is no longer in custody but presents new evidence of fundamental error, specifically that the government knowingly suppressed critical information from the courts during the original proceedings?
Yes, the petition for a writ of coram nobis is granted. The Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua. Ut enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exercitation ullamco laboris nisi ut aliquip ex ea commodo consequat. Duis aute irure dolor in reprehenderit in voluptate velit esse cillum dolore eu fugiat nulla pariatur. Excepteur sint occaecat cupidatat non proident, sunt in culpa qui officia deserunt mollit anim id est laborum. Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consecte
IRAC Legal Analysis
About IRAC analysis
IRAC (Issue, Rule, Analysis, Conclusion) is the structure professors expect in exam answers. Each LSD.Law brief states the issue, the governing rule with citations, the court's application of that rule, and the conclusion - the same reasoning pattern you will use on exams and in practice.
Legal Issue
May a district court grant a writ of coram nobis to vacate a long-standing conviction where the petitioner is no longer in custody but presents new evidence of fundamental error, specifically that the government knowingly suppressed critical information from the courts during the original proceedings?
Conclusion
The decision vacates Korematsu's conviction on the basis of governmental misconduct, providing Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua. Ut enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exercitation ullamco laboris nisi ut a
Legal Rule
A writ of coram nobis, available under the All Writs Act, 28 Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua. Ut enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exercitation ullamco laboris nisi ut aliquip ex ea commodo consequat. Duis aute irure dolor in reprehenderit in voluptate velit esse cillum dolore eu fugiat nulla pariatur. Exce
Legal Analysis
The court first rejected the government's counter-motion to dismiss the indictment under Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua. Ut enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exercitation ullamco laboris nisi ut aliquip ex ea commodo consequat. Duis aute irure dolor in reprehenderit in voluptate velit esse cillum dolore eu fugiat nulla pariatur. Excepteur sint occaecat cupidatat non proident, sunt in culpa qui officia deserunt mollit anim id est laborum. Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua. Ut enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exercitation ullamco laboris nisi ut aliquip ex ea commodo consequat. Duis aute irure dolor in reprehenderit in voluptate velit esse cillum dolore eu fugiat nulla pariatur. Excepteur sint occaecat cupidatat non proident, sunt in culpa qui officia deserunt mollit anim id est laborum. Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua. Ut enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exercitation ullamco laboris nisi ut aliquip ex ea commodo consequat. Duis aute irure dolor in reprehenderit in voluptate velit esse cillum dolore eu fugiat nulla pariatur. Excepteur sint occaecat cupidatat non proident, sunt in culpa qui officia deserunt mollit anim id est laborum. Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua. Ut enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exercitation ullamco laboris nisi ut aliquip ex
Flash-to-Full Case Opinions
Flash Summary
- The court granted Fred Korematsu’s petition for a writ of *coram