Kellos v. Sawilowsky Case Brief
Audio lesson available for this case
LSD+ subscribers can listen to a recorded discussion of this brief - the full facts, holding, and reasoning in audio form.
Complete case briefs with LSD+
Every LSD.Law brief pairs a full IRAC analysis with opinion summaries at three levels of depth, written by a team of Harvard Law and MIT graduates - a quick synopsis when you are pressed for time, the complete reasoning when you need to go deep.
Adaptive Case Views
Toggle between Flash, Standard, and Expanded. Get what you need, when you need it.
Exam-Ready IRAC Format
We deliver the precise structure professors look for in exam answers.
Complex Cases, Clarified
We break down dense legal reasoning into something digestible, helping you grasp core concepts.
Case Brief Summary & Legal Analysis
tl;dr: The Georgia Supreme Court clarified that the legal malpractice standard of care is that of practitioners in Georgia, affirming summary judgment due to insufficient plaintiff expert evidence.
Legal Significance: Established the standard of care in Georgia legal malpractice actions as that of Georgia practitioners, emphasizing practical pleading over a nebulous “general profession” standard.
Kellos v. Sawilowsky Law School Study Guide
Use this case brief structure for your own legal analysis. Focus on the IRAC methodology to excel in law school exams and cold calls.
Case Facts & Court Holding
Key Facts & Case Background
Defendant-attorney Sawilowsky faced a legal malpractice claim. He moved for summary judgment, submitting an affidavit asserting he exercised the “degree of skill, prudence and diligence as lawyers of ordinary skill and capacity commonly possess and exercise in the State of Georgia.” The trial court granted summary judgment. The Court of Appeals affirmed, with its majority noting the plaintiff’s expert evidence failed to create an issue of fact, while also referencing a “legal profession generally” standard. The Georgia Supreme Court granted certiorari specifically to resolve whether the applicable standard of care for attorneys in Georgia is the “locality” (State of Georgia) standard or that of the “legal profession generally,” particularly if these standards differ. The plaintiff’s challenge centered on the adequacy of the defendant’s affidavit using the state-specific standard and the overall sufficiency of evidence concerning the breach of duty.
Court Holding & Legal Precedent
Issue: Did the court determine that the applicable standard of care for attorneys in Georgia legal malpractice actions is that of practitioners within the State of Georgia rather than a “legal profession generally” standard?
Yes, the applicable standard of care for attorneys in Georgia legal malpractice Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua. Ut enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exercitation ullamco laboris nisi ut aliquip ex ea commodo consequat. Duis aute irure dolor in reprehenderit in voluptate velit esse cillum dolore eu fugiat nulla pariatur. Excepteur sint occaecat cupi
IRAC Legal Analysis
About IRAC analysis
IRAC (Issue, Rule, Analysis, Conclusion) is the structure professors expect in exam answers. Each LSD.Law brief states the issue, the governing rule with citations, the court's application of that rule, and the conclusion - the same reasoning pattern you will use on exams and in practice.
Legal Issue
Did the court determine that the applicable standard of care for attorneys in Georgia legal malpractice actions is that of practitioners within the State of Georgia rather than a “legal profession generally” standard?
Conclusion
This case establishes the "practitioners in Georgia" standard for legal malpractice, prioritizing Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua. U
Legal Rule
In Georgia legal malpractice actions, the applicable standard of care is that Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua. Ut enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exercitation ullamco laboris nisi ut aliquip ex ea commodo consequat. Duis aute irure dolor in reprehenderit in voluptate
Legal Analysis
The Supreme Court of Georgia addressed the ambiguity surrounding the standard of Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua. Ut enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exercitation ullamco laboris nisi ut aliquip ex ea commodo consequat. Duis aute irure dolor in reprehenderit in voluptate velit esse cillum dolore eu fugiat nulla pariatur. Excepteur sint occaecat cupidatat non proident, sunt in culpa qui officia deserunt mollit anim id est laborum. Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua. Ut enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exercitation ullamco laboris nisi ut aliquip ex ea commodo consequat. Duis aute irure dolor in reprehenderit in voluptate velit esse cillum dolore eu fugiat nulla pariatur. Excepteur sint occaecat cupidatat non proident, sunt in culpa qui officia deserunt mollit anim id est laborum. Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua. Ut enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exercitation ullamco laboris nisi ut aliquip ex ea commodo consequat. Duis aute irure dolor in reprehenderit in voluptate velit esse cillum dolore eu fugiat nulla pariatur. Excepteur sint occaecat cupidatat non proident, sunt in culpa qui officia deserunt mollit anim id est laborum. Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua. Ut enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exercitation ullamco laboris nisi ut aliquip ex ea commodo co
Flash-to-Full Case Opinions
Flash Summary
- In Georgia legal malpractice actions, the applicable standard of care is