Katskee v. Blue Cross/Blue Shield Case Brief

Nebraska Supreme Court • 1994 • Docket #1965940
515 N.W.2d 645 245 Neb. 808 1994 Neb. LEXIS 105

Complete case briefs with LSD+

Every LSD.Law brief pairs a full IRAC analysis with opinion summaries at three levels of depth, written by a team of Harvard Law and MIT graduates - a quick synopsis when you are pressed for time, the complete reasoning when you need to go deep.

Adaptive Case Views

Toggle between Flash, Standard, and Expanded. Get what you need, when you need it.

Exam-Ready IRAC Format

We deliver the precise structure professors look for in exam answers.

Complex Cases, Clarified

We break down dense legal reasoning into something digestible, helping you grasp core concepts.

Case Brief Summary & Legal Analysis

4 min read

tl;dr: Katskee sued Blue Cross for denying coverage for prophylactic surgery due to a genetic syndrome predisposing her to cancer. The court found the syndrome constituted an “illness” under the insurance policy, reversing summary judgment for the insurer.

Legal Significance: Establishes that a genetic predisposition significantly increasing disease risk can constitute an “illness” under an insurance policy, even absent active disease, based on plain meaning and contract interpretation principles.

Case Facts & Court Holding

Key Facts & Case Background

Appellant Sindie Katskee was diagnosed with breast-ovarian carcinoma syndrome, a genetic condition conferring at least a 50% chance of developing breast and/or ovarian cancer, compared to a 1.4% risk for unaffected women. Her physicians, Dr. Lynch and Dr. Roffman, recommended a prophylactic total abdominal hysterectomy and bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy as the most medically appropriate treatment. Katskee’s health insurance policy with Appellee Blue Cross/Blue Shield of Nebraska (BCBS) provided coverage for services that are “medically necessary” for the diagnosis or treatment of a covered person’s “Illness,” “Injury,” or “Pregnancy.” The policy defined “Illness” as a “bodily disorder or disease” but did not provide further definitions for these terms. BCBS denied coverage for the surgery, contending that Katskee’s condition did not constitute an “illness” because she did not currently have cancer, only a predisposition. Katskee proceeded with the surgery and subsequently filed a breach of contract action to recover the costs. The district court granted summary judgment in favor of BCBS, finding the policy did not cover the surgery.

Court Holding & Legal Precedent

Issue: Does a genetic condition, specifically breast-ovarian carcinoma syndrome, which significantly increases the risk of developing cancer but has not yet manifested as active cancer, constitute an “illness” defined as a “bodily disorder or disease” under the terms of a health insurance contract?

Yes, breast-ovarian carcinoma syndrome constitutes an “illness” within the plain and ordinary Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua. Ut enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exercitation ullamco laboris nisi ut aliquip ex ea commodo consequat. Duis aute irure dolor in reprehenderit in voluptate velit esse cillum dolore eu fugiat nulla pariatur. Excepteur sint occaecat cupidatat non proident, sunt in culpa qui officia deserunt mollit anim id est laborum. Lorem i

Read the full analysis

The complete holding, rule, and analysis for this case are available to LSD+ subscribers.

Start 14-Day Free Trial

IRAC Legal Analysis

Premium Feature Unlock

About IRAC analysis

IRAC (Issue, Rule, Analysis, Conclusion) is the structure professors expect in exam answers. Each LSD.Law brief states the issue, the governing rule with citations, the court's application of that rule, and the conclusion - the same reasoning pattern you will use on exams and in practice.

Legal Issue

Does a genetic condition, specifically breast-ovarian carcinoma syndrome, which significantly increases the risk of developing cancer but has not yet manifested as active cancer, constitute an “illness” defined as a “bodily disorder or disease” under the terms of a health insurance contract?

Conclusion

This case establishes significant precedent for interpreting "illness" in insurance contracts, particularly Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua. Ut enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exercitation ullamco laboris nisi ut aliquip ex ea commodo consequat. Duis aute irure dolor in reprehenderit in voluptate velit esse cillum dolore eu fugiat n

Legal Rule

An insurance policy is construed as any other contract to give effect Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua. Ut enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exercitation ullamco laboris nisi ut aliquip ex ea commodo consequat. Duis aute irure dolor in reprehenderit in voluptate velit esse cillum dolore eu fugiat nulla pariatur. Excepteur sint occaecat cupidatat non proident, sunt in culpa qui officia deserunt mollit anim id est laborum. Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua. Ut enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exercitation ullamco laboris nisi ut aliquip ex ea commodo consequat. Duis aute irure dolor in reprehenderit in voluptate velit esse cillum dolore eu fugiat nulla pariatur. Excepteur sint occaecat cupidatat non proident, sunt in culpa qui officia deserunt mollit anim id est laborum. Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua. Ut enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exercitation ullamco laboris nisi ut aliquip ex ea commodo consequat. Duis a

Legal Analysis

The court's primary task was to interpret the term "illness" as defined Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua. Ut enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exercitation ullamco laboris nisi ut aliquip ex ea commodo consequat. Duis aute irure dolor in reprehenderit in voluptate velit esse cillum dolore eu fugiat nulla pariatur. Excepteur sint occaecat cupidatat non proident, sunt in culpa qui officia deserunt mollit anim id est laborum. Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua. Ut enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exercitation ullamco laboris nisi ut aliquip ex ea commodo consequat. Duis aute irure dolor in reprehenderit in voluptate velit esse cillum dolore eu fugiat nulla pariatur. Excepteur sint occaecat cupidatat non proident, sunt in culpa qui officia deserunt mollit anim id est laborum. Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua. Ut enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exercitation ullamco laboris nisi ut aliquip ex ea commodo consequat. Duis aute irure dolor in reprehenderit in voluptate velit esse cillum dolore eu fugiat nulla pariatur. Excepteur sint occaecat cupidatat non proident, sunt in culpa qui officia deserunt mollit anim id est laborum. Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua. Ut enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exercitation ullamco laboris nisi ut aliquip ex ea commodo consequat. Duis aute irure dolor in reprehenderit in voluptate velit esse cillum dolore eu fugiat nulla pariatur. Excepteur sint occaecat cupidatat non proident, sunt in culpa qui off

Flash-to-Full Case Opinions

Flash Summary

  • A genetic predisposition to cancer (breast-ovarian carcinoma syndrome) can constitute an
Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua. Ut enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exercitation ullamco laboris nisi ut aliquip ex ea commodo consequat. Duis aute irure dolor in reprehenderit in

Read the full analysis

The complete holding, rule, and analysis for this case are available to LSD+ subscribers.

Start 14-Day Free Trial