In Re Grand Jury Subpoena Served on Meserve, Mumper & Hughes. United States of America v. Janet Greeson's a Place for Us, Inc. Janet Greeson Janet Greeson's a Place for Us of Van Nuys, Inc. Janet Greeson's a Place for Us at Costa Mesa, Inc. And Janet Greeson's a Place for Us at Long Beach, Inc., Defendants-Intervenors-Appellants Case Brief
Complete case briefs with LSD+
Every LSD.Law brief pairs a full IRAC analysis with opinion summaries at three levels of depth, written by a team of Harvard Law and MIT graduates - a quick synopsis when you are pressed for time, the complete reasoning when you need to go deep.
Adaptive Case Views
Toggle between Flash, Standard, and Expanded. Get what you need, when you need it.
Exam-Ready IRAC Format
We deliver the precise structure professors look for in exam answers.
Complex Cases, Clarified
We break down dense legal reasoning into something digestible, helping you grasp core concepts.
Case Brief Summary & Legal Analysis
tl;dr: A grand jury subpoenaed documents sealed by a protective order from a prior civil case. The court held that a grand jury’s power to investigate crime always outweighs a civil protective order, establishing a per se rule that the subpoena must be enforced.
Legal Significance: This case establishes a per se rule in the Ninth Circuit that a grand jury subpoena takes precedence over a civil protective order, resolving a question of first impression by rejecting the Second Circuit’s balancing test in favor of the Fourth and Eleventh Circuits’ approach.
In Re Grand Jury Subpoena Served on Meserve, Mumper & Hughes. United States of America v. Janet Greeson's a Place for Us, Inc. Janet Greeson Janet Greeson's a Place for Us of Van Nuys, Inc. Janet Greeson's a Place for Us at Costa Mesa, Inc. And Janet Greeson's a Place for Us at Long Beach, Inc., Defendants-Intervenors-Appellants Law School Study Guide
Use this case brief structure for your own legal analysis. Focus on the IRAC methodology to excel in law school exams and cold calls.
Case Facts & Court Holding
Key Facts & Case Background
A federal grand jury initiated a criminal investigation into Janet Greeson’s A Place For Us, Inc. (APFU) for alleged fraudulent billing. Previously, APFU had been sued in a civil action by insurance companies for the same conduct. That civil suit settled after extensive discovery, and as part of the settlement, the district court issued a protective order under Fed. R. Civ. P. 26(c) sealing the discovery documents. The grand jury subsequently issued a subpoena to the law firm representing the civil plaintiffs, demanding production of all documents obtained during the civil discovery. APFU intervened in the criminal matter, moving to quash the subpoena on the grounds that the documents were shielded by the civil protective order. The district court denied the motion to quash, and APFU appealed, presenting a question of first impression for the Ninth Circuit.
Court Holding & Legal Precedent
Issue: Does a grand jury subpoena compelling the production of documents supersede a pre-existing civil protective order issued under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 26(c) that seals those same documents?
Yes. A grand jury subpoena prevails over a Rule 26(c) protective order. Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua. Ut enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exercitat
IRAC Legal Analysis
About IRAC analysis
IRAC (Issue, Rule, Analysis, Conclusion) is the structure professors expect in exam answers. Each LSD.Law brief states the issue, the governing rule with citations, the court's application of that rule, and the conclusion - the same reasoning pattern you will use on exams and in practice.
Legal Issue
Does a grand jury subpoena compelling the production of documents supersede a pre-existing civil protective order issued under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 26(c) that seals those same documents?
Conclusion
The decision solidifies the grand jury's broad investigative authority in the Ninth Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua. Ut enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exercitation ullamco laboris nisi ut aliquip ex ea commodo consequat. Duis aute irure dolor in reprehenderit
Legal Rule
A grand jury subpoena takes precedence over a validly issued Fed. R. Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua. Ut enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exercitation ullamco laboris nisi ut aliquip ex ea commodo consequa
Legal Analysis
The court adopted the per se rule of the Fourth and Eleventh Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua. Ut enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exercitation ullamco laboris nisi ut aliquip ex ea commodo consequat. Duis aute irure dolor in reprehenderit in voluptate velit esse cillum dolore eu fugiat nulla pariatur. Excepteur sint occaecat cupidatat non proident, sunt in culpa qui officia deserunt mollit anim id est laborum. Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua. Ut enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exercitation ullamco laboris nisi ut aliquip ex ea commodo consequat. Duis aute irure dolor in reprehenderit in voluptate velit esse cillum dolore eu fugiat nulla pariatur. Excepteur sint occaecat cupidatat non proident, sunt in culpa qui officia deserunt mollit anim id est laborum. Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua. Ut enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exercitation ullamco laboris nisi ut aliquip ex ea commodo consequat. Duis aute irure dolor in reprehenderit in voluptate velit esse cillum dolore eu fugiat nulla pariatur. Excepteur sint occaecat cupidatat non proident, sunt in culpa qui officia deserunt mollit anim id est laborum. Lorem
Flash-to-Full Case Opinions
Flash Summary
- A grand jury subpoena always trumps a civil protective order issued