Haywood v. State Case Brief

Court of Appeals of Georgia2007Docket #889654
642 S.E.2d 203 283 Ga. App. 568 2007 Fulton County D. Rep. 455 2007 Ga. App. LEXIS 117 Criminal Law Evidence

Complete case briefs with LSD+

Every LSD.Law brief pairs a full IRAC analysis with opinion summaries at three levels of depth, written by a team of Harvard Law and MIT graduates - a quick synopsis when you are pressed for time, the complete reasoning when you need to go deep.

Adaptive Case Views

Toggle between Flash, Standard, and Expanded. Get what you need, when you need it.

Exam-Ready IRAC Format

We deliver the precise structure professors look for in exam answers.

Complex Cases, Clarified

We break down dense legal reasoning into something digestible, helping you grasp core concepts.

Case Brief Summary & Legal Analysis

3 min read

tl;dr: A defendant was convicted of statutory rape after the court excluded evidence of his belief that the victim was over the age of consent. The appellate court affirmed, holding that statutory rape is a strict liability crime regarding the victim’s age, making the defendant’s belief legally irrelevant.

Legal Significance: This case affirms that statutory rape in Georgia is a strict liability offense concerning the victim’s age. A defendant’s reasonable mistake of fact regarding the victim’s age is not a valid defense, and evidence supporting such a belief is inadmissible as it is legally irrelevant.

Haywood v. State Law School Study Guide

Use this case brief structure for your own legal analysis. Focus on the IRAC methodology to excel in law school exams and cold calls.

Case Facts & Court Holding

Key Facts & Case Background

Adrian Haywood engaged in sexual intercourse with a 15-year-old girl, F.M. He was subsequently indicted for statutory rape under OCGA § 16-6-3, as well as child molestation and rape. The victim’s actual age was not contested. Before trial, the prosecution successfully moved in limine to exclude any evidence that Haywood believed F.M. was 16 years of age or older. Haywood argued this evidence was relevant to his criminal intent and for impeaching the victim’s credibility regarding alleged prior statements she made about her age. The trial court granted the motion, precluding the defense from presenting this evidence. A jury convicted Haywood of statutory rape and child molestation (the latter of which merged for sentencing) but acquitted him of rape. Haywood appealed his statutory rape conviction, arguing the trial court erred by granting the State’s motion in limine and excluding evidence of his mistake of fact as to the victim’s age.

Court Holding & Legal Precedent

Issue: Did the trial court err in excluding evidence of a defendant’s belief that the victim was over the age of consent in a prosecution for statutory rape?

No. The trial court did not abuse its discretion by excluding evidence Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua. Ut enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exercitation ullamco laboris nis

Read the full analysis

The complete holding, rule, and analysis for this case are available to LSD+ subscribers.

Start 14-Day Free Trial

IRAC Legal Analysis

Premium Feature Unlock

About IRAC analysis

IRAC (Issue, Rule, Analysis, Conclusion) is the structure professors expect in exam answers. Each LSD.Law brief states the issue, the governing rule with citations, the court's application of that rule, and the conclusion - the same reasoning pattern you will use on exams and in practice.

Legal Issue

Did the trial court err in excluding evidence of a defendant’s belief that the victim was over the age of consent in a prosecution for statutory rape?

Conclusion

The case provides a clear precedent that statutory rape in Georgia is Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua. Ut enim ad minim veniam, quis

Legal Rule

Under Georgia law, a defendant's knowledge of the victim's age is not Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua. Ut enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exercitation ullamco laboris nisi ut aliquip ex ea

Legal Analysis

The Court of Appeals affirmed the trial court's ruling by focusing on Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua. Ut enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exercitation ullamco laboris nisi ut aliquip ex ea commodo consequat. Duis aute irure dolor in reprehenderit in voluptate velit esse cillum dolore eu fugiat nulla pariatur. Excepteur sint occaecat cupidatat non proident, sunt in culpa qui officia deserunt mollit anim id est laborum. Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua. Ut enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exercitation ullamco laboris nisi ut aliquip ex ea commodo consequat. Duis aute irure dolor in reprehenderit in voluptate velit esse cillum dolore eu fugiat nulla pariatur. Excepteur sint occaecat cupidatat non proident, sunt in culpa qui officia deserunt mollit anim id est laborum. Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua. Ut enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exercitation ullamco laboris nisi ut aliquip ex ea commodo cons

Flash-to-Full Case Opinions

Flash Summary

  • In Georgia, statutory rape is a strict liability crime regarding the
Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua. Ut enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exercitation ullamco laboris nisi ut aliquip ex ea commodo consequat. Duis aute irure dolor in reprehenderit in voluptate velit esse cillum dolore eu fugiat nulla pariatur.

Read the full analysis

The complete holding, rule, and analysis for this case are available to LSD+ subscribers.

Start 14-Day Free Trial