GROSSMAN HOLDINGS LTD. v. HOURIHAN Case Brief
Complete case briefs with LSD+
Every LSD.Law brief pairs a full IRAC analysis with opinion summaries at three levels of depth, written by a team of Harvard Law and MIT graduates - a quick synopsis when you are pressed for time, the complete reasoning when you need to go deep.
Adaptive Case Views
Toggle between Flash, Standard, and Expanded. Get what you need, when you need it.
Exam-Ready IRAC Format
We deliver the precise structure professors look for in exam answers.
Complex Cases, Clarified
We break down dense legal reasoning into something digestible, helping you grasp core concepts.
Case Brief Summary & Legal Analysis
tl;dr: A builder constructed a house as a mirror image of the agreed-upon plans. The court held the buyers’ damages were not the cost to rebuild but the diminution in the property’s value caused by the deviation, applying the “economic waste” doctrine from the Restatement.
Legal Significance: This case formally adopted the Restatement (First) of Contracts § 346(1)(a) in Florida, establishing that for construction defects, damages are the lesser of cost-to-complete or diminution-in-value, especially where correction would cause unreasonable economic waste.
GROSSMAN HOLDINGS LTD. v. HOURIHAN Law School Study Guide
Use this case brief structure for your own legal analysis. Focus on the IRAC methodology to excel in law school exams and cold calls.
Case Facts & Court Holding
Key Facts & Case Background
The Hourihans (Plaintiffs) entered into a contract with Grossman Holdings Ltd. (Defendant) to purchase a house to be constructed. The contract, model home, and architectural drawings all indicated the house would have a southeast exposure. The contract stipulated that the builder would construct the house “substantially the same” as the plans and model. Subsequently, Grossman revised the plans to build a mirror image of the house, reversing its orientation. The Hourihans discovered the change and immediately objected, but Grossman proceeded with construction of the reversed home despite their protests. The Hourihans sued for breach of contract. The trial court found a breach had occurred but refused to award damages, reasoning that reconstruction would constitute economic waste and that the home’s overall market value had appreciated. The district court of appeal reversed, holding that the economic waste doctrine was inapplicable to residential construction and that the proper measure of damages was the cost to reconstruct the home to conform to the original plans.
Court Holding & Legal Precedent
Issue: What is the proper measure of damages for breach of a construction contract when the builder fails to construct a residence according to the agreed-upon specifications, and rectifying the defect would result in unreasonable economic waste?
The court held that the proper measure of damages is the diminution Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua. Ut enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exercitation ullamco laboris nisi ut aliquip ex ea commodo consequat. Duis aute irure dolor in reprehenderit in voluptate velit esse cillum dolore eu fugiat nulla pariatur.
IRAC Legal Analysis
About IRAC analysis
IRAC (Issue, Rule, Analysis, Conclusion) is the structure professors expect in exam answers. Each LSD.Law brief states the issue, the governing rule with citations, the court's application of that rule, and the conclusion - the same reasoning pattern you will use on exams and in practice.
Legal Issue
What is the proper measure of damages for breach of a construction contract when the builder fails to construct a residence according to the agreed-upon specifications, and rectifying the defect would result in unreasonable economic waste?
Conclusion
This decision solidifies the economic waste doctrine in Florida construction law, prioritizing Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua. Ut enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exercitation ullamco laboris nisi ut aliquip ex ea
Legal Rule
For a breach of a construction contract, the measure of damages is Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua. Ut enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exercitation ullamco laboris nisi ut aliquip ex ea commodo consequat. Duis aute irure dolor in reprehenderit in voluptate velit esse cillum dolore eu fugiat nulla pariatur. Excepteur sint occaecat cupidatat non proident, sunt in culpa qui officia deserunt mollit anim id est laborum. Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur
Legal Analysis
The Supreme Court of Florida formally adopted § 346(1)(a) of the Restatement Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua. Ut enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exercitation ullamco laboris nisi ut aliquip ex ea commodo consequat. Duis aute irure dolor in reprehenderit in voluptate velit esse cillum dolore eu fugiat nulla pariatur. Excepteur sint occaecat cupidatat non proident, sunt in culpa qui officia deserunt mollit anim id est laborum. Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua. Ut enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exercitation ullamco laboris nisi ut aliquip ex ea commodo consequat. Duis aute irure dolor in reprehenderit in voluptate velit esse cillum dolore eu fugiat nulla pariatur. Excepteur sint occaecat cupidatat non proident, sunt in culpa qui officia deserunt mollit anim id est laborum. Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua. Ut enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exercitation ullamco laboris nisi ut aliquip ex ea commodo consequat. Duis aute irure dolor in reprehenderit in voluptate velit esse cillum dolore eu fugiat nulla pariatur. Excepteur sint occaecat cupidatat non proident, sunt in culpa qui officia deserunt mollit anim id est laborum. Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod
Flash-to-Full Case Opinions
Flash Summary
- For a construction contract breach, Florida adopts Restatement § 346(1)(a). -