Gray v. Kohl Case Brief

District Court, S.D. Florida2008Docket #2284124
568 F. Supp. 2d 1378 2008 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 49482 2008 WL 2557381

Complete case briefs with LSD+

Every LSD.Law brief pairs a full IRAC analysis with opinion summaries at three levels of depth, written by a team of Harvard Law and MIT graduates - a quick synopsis when you are pressed for time, the complete reasoning when you need to go deep.

Adaptive Case Views

Toggle between Flash, Standard, and Expanded. Get what you need, when you need it.

Exam-Ready IRAC Format

We deliver the precise structure professors look for in exam answers.

Complex Cases, Clarified

We break down dense legal reasoning into something digestible, helping you grasp core concepts.

Case Brief Summary & Legal Analysis

3 min read

tl;dr: A court found parts of a Florida school safety zone statute unconstitutionally vague for failing to define “legitimate business,” thereby chilling First Amendment activities like Bible distribution on public sidewalks.

Legal Significance: This case exemplifies the application of the vagueness doctrine to invalidate statutory provisions that fail to provide adequate notice of prohibited conduct, particularly when First Amendment rights are implicated.

Gray v. Kohl Law School Study Guide

Use this case brief structure for your own legal analysis. Focus on the IRAC methodology to excel in law school exams and cold calls.

Case Facts & Court Holding

Key Facts & Case Background

Plaintiff Thomas Gray, a member of Gideons International, sought to distribute Bibles on a public sidewalk within 500 feet of Key Largo School, an area designated as a school safety zone under Florida Statute § 810.0975. The statute prohibited individuals from being in the zone during certain hours without “legitimate business,” authorization, license, or invitation. Gray had previously distributed Bibles at another school with police permission. However, during a planned distribution at Key Largo School, after notifying authorities and school personnel (who were unavailable), other Gideons were arrested under the statute. Gray ceased his distribution fearing arrest and prosecution. The statute defined a school safety zone as 500 feet from school property, encompassing public sidewalks, businesses, and residences. Gray challenged the statute as unconstitutionally vague and overbroad, arguing the term “legitimate business” failed to provide fair notice of prohibited conduct and allowed for arbitrary enforcement, thereby infringing on his First Amendment rights to free speech and free exercise of religion. The statute exempted residents and those operating licensed commercial businesses.

Court Holding & Legal Precedent

Issue: Does the Florida School Safety Zone Statute’s prohibition against being in a school safety zone without “legitimate business,” as applied to individuals distributing Bibles on a public sidewalk, violate the Due Process Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment due to vagueness?

Yes, subsections (2)(a) and (2)(b) of the Florida School Safety Zone Statute Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua. Ut enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exercitation ullamco laboris nisi ut aliquip ex ea commodo consequat. Duis aute irure dolor in reprehenderit in voluptate velit esse cillum dolore eu fugiat nulla pariatur. Excepteur sint occaecat cupidatat non proident, sunt in culpa qui officia deserunt mollit anim id est laborum. Lorem ipsum

Read the full analysis

The complete holding, rule, and analysis for this case are available to LSD+ subscribers.

Start 14-Day Free Trial

IRAC Legal Analysis

Premium Feature Unlock

About IRAC analysis

IRAC (Issue, Rule, Analysis, Conclusion) is the structure professors expect in exam answers. Each LSD.Law brief states the issue, the governing rule with citations, the court's application of that rule, and the conclusion - the same reasoning pattern you will use on exams and in practice.

Legal Issue

Does the Florida School Safety Zone Statute’s prohibition against being in a school safety zone without “legitimate business,” as applied to individuals distributing Bibles on a public sidewalk, violate the Due Process Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment due to vagueness?

Conclusion

The case underscores that statutes restricting access to public areas, especially those Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua. Ut enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exercitation ullamco laboris nisi ut aliquip ex ea commod

Legal Rule

A criminal law is unconstitutionally vague if it fails to provide notice Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua. Ut enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exercitation ullamco laboris nisi

Legal Analysis

The court analyzed the vagueness challenge under the Due Process Clause, focusing Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua. Ut enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exercitation ullamco laboris nisi ut aliquip ex ea commodo consequat. Duis aute irure dolor in reprehenderit in voluptate velit esse cillum dolore eu fugiat nulla pariatur. Excepteur sint occaecat cupidatat non proident, sunt in culpa qui officia deserunt mollit anim id est laborum. Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua. Ut enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exercitation ullamco laboris nisi ut aliquip ex ea commodo consequat. Duis aute irure dolor in reprehenderit in voluptate velit esse cillum dolore eu fugiat nulla pariatur. Excepteur sint occaecat cupidatat non proident, sunt in culpa qui officia deserunt mollit anim id est laborum. Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua. Ut enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exercitation ullamco laboris nisi ut aliquip ex ea commodo consequat. Duis aute irure dolor in reprehenderit in voluptate velit esse cillum dolore eu fugiat nulla pariatur. Excepteur sint occaecat cupidatat non proident, sunt in culpa qui officia deserunt mollit anim id est laborum. Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua. Ut enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exercitation ullamco laboris nisi ut aliquip ex ea commodo consequat. Duis aute irure dolor in reprehenderit in voluptate velit esse cillum dolore eu fugiat nulla pariatur. Excepteur sin

Flash-to-Full Case Opinions

Flash Summary

  • Florida’s School Safety Zone Statute subsections (2)(a) & (2)(b) are **unconstitutionally
Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua. Ut enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exercitation ullamco laboris nisi ut aliquip ex ea commodo consequat. Duis aute irure dolor in reprehenderit in voluptate velit esse cillum dolore eu fugiat nulla pariatur. Excepteur sint occaecat cupidatat non proident, sunt in culpa qui officia deserunt mollit anim id est laborum. Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet,

Read the full analysis

The complete holding, rule, and analysis for this case are available to LSD+ subscribers.

Start 14-Day Free Trial