GOODIS v. UNITED ARTISTS TELEVISION, INC. Case Brief
Complete case briefs with LSD+
Every LSD.Law brief pairs a full IRAC analysis with opinion summaries at three levels of depth, written by a team of Harvard Law and MIT graduates - a quick synopsis when you are pressed for time, the complete reasoning when you need to go deep.
Adaptive Case Views
Toggle between Flash, Standard, and Expanded. Get what you need, when you need it.
Exam-Ready IRAC Format
We deliver the precise structure professors look for in exam answers.
Complex Cases, Clarified
We break down dense legal reasoning into something digestible, helping you grasp core concepts.
Case Brief Summary & Legal Analysis
tl;dr: An author sold serialization rights to a magazine, which published the work under its own general copyright notice. The court held this did not forfeit the author’s copyright, rejecting a harsh application of the “indivisibility of copyright” doctrine to invalidate the author’s rights.
Legal Significance: This case critically limited the doctrine of indivisibility of copyright, establishing that a single notice in a collective work protects an author’s contribution, even if the publisher is only a licensee. It prioritized preventing forfeiture over rigid formal requirements under the 1909 Copyright Act.
GOODIS v. UNITED ARTISTS TELEVISION, INC. Law School Study Guide
Use this case brief structure for your own legal analysis. Focus on the IRAC methodology to excel in law school exams and cold calls.
Case Facts & Court Holding
Key Facts & Case Background
Author David Goodis wrote the novel “Dark Passage.” In 1945, he granted exclusive motion picture rights to Warner Brothers. He also granted Curtis Publishing Co. the right to serialize the novel in “The Saturday Evening Post” before its book publication. The novel was first published in eight installments in the magazine, which contained a single, general copyright notice in Curtis’s name in each issue. No separate copyright notice was placed in Goodis’s name. Years later, Warner Brothers’ rights were assigned to United Artists Television, Inc. (defendant), which produced the television series “The Fugitive.” Goodis’s estate (plaintiff) sued for copyright infringement. The defendants argued that because Curtis was merely a licensee of serialization rights and not the full proprietor of the work, its general copyright notice was insufficient to protect Goodis’s copyright. They contended this failure to comply with notice formalities under the doctrine of copyright indivisibility thrust the novel into the public domain upon its first publication in the magazine. The district court granted summary judgment for the defendants on this basis.
Court Holding & Legal Precedent
Issue: Does a magazine publisher’s single copyright notice on a periodical, where the publisher holds only limited serialization rights, suffice to protect the copyright of an author whose work is first published as a contribution within that periodical?
Yes. The court held that the copyright in “Dark Passage” was validly Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua. Ut enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exercitation ullamco laboris nisi ut aliquip ex ea commodo consequat. Duis aute irure dolor in reprehenderit in voluptate velit esse cillum dolore eu fugiat nulla pariatur. Excepteur sint occaecat cupidatat non proident, sunt in culpa qui officia deserunt mollit anim id est la
IRAC Legal Analysis
About IRAC analysis
IRAC (Issue, Rule, Analysis, Conclusion) is the structure professors expect in exam answers. Each LSD.Law brief states the issue, the governing rule with citations, the court's application of that rule, and the conclusion - the same reasoning pattern you will use on exams and in practice.
Legal Issue
Does a magazine publisher’s single copyright notice on a periodical, where the publisher holds only limited serialization rights, suffice to protect the copyright of an author whose work is first published as a contribution within that periodical?
Conclusion
This case represents a significant judicial limitation on the doctrine of copyright Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua. Ut enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exercitation ullamco laboris nisi ut aliquip ex ea commodo consequat. Duis a
Legal Rule
Where a magazine has purchased the right of first publication under circumstances Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua. Ut enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exercitation ullamco laboris nisi ut aliquip ex ea commodo consequat. Du
Legal Analysis
The Second Circuit reversed the district court's finding of forfeiture, focusing on Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua. Ut enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exercitation ullamco laboris nisi ut aliquip ex ea commodo consequat. Duis aute irure dolor in reprehenderit in voluptate velit esse cillum dolore eu fugiat nulla pariatur. Excepteur sint occaecat cupidatat non proident, sunt in culpa qui officia deserunt mollit anim id est laborum. Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua. Ut enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exercitation ullamco laboris nisi ut aliquip ex ea commodo consequat. Duis aute irure dolor in reprehenderit in voluptate velit esse cillum dolore eu fugiat nulla pariatur. Excepteur sint occaecat cupidatat non proident, sunt in culpa qui officia deserunt mollit anim id est laborum. Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua. Ut enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exercitation ullamco laboris nisi ut aliquip ex ea commodo consequat. Duis aute irure dolor in reprehenderit in voluptate velit esse cillum dolore eu fugiat nulla pariatur. Excepteur sint occaecat cupidatat non proident, sunt in culpa qui officia deserunt mollit anim id est laborum. Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut la
Flash-to-Full Case Opinions
Flash Summary
- A magazine’s general copyright notice is sufficient to protect the copyright