FW Woolworth v. Kirby Case Brief
Complete case briefs with LSD+
Every LSD.Law brief pairs a full IRAC analysis with opinion summaries at three levels of depth, written by a team of Harvard Law and MIT graduates - a quick synopsis when you are pressed for time, the complete reasoning when you need to go deep.
Adaptive Case Views
Toggle between Flash, Standard, and Expanded. Get what you need, when you need it.
Exam-Ready IRAC Format
We deliver the precise structure professors look for in exam answers.
Complex Cases, Clarified
We break down dense legal reasoning into something digestible, helping you grasp core concepts.
Case Brief Summary & Legal Analysis
tl;dr: A store held a promotional “ping-pong ball drop” that attracted a large, chaotic crowd. An elderly woman was knocked down and injured by the crowd. The court held the store had a duty to protect her from the foreseeable actions of other patrons.
Legal Significance: This case establishes that a business proprietor owes a duty of reasonable care to protect patrons from foreseeable injuries caused by crowds the business intentionally assembles for a promotional event, making the foreseeability of crowd behavior a question for the jury.
FW Woolworth v. Kirby Law School Study Guide
Use this case brief structure for your own legal analysis. Focus on the IRAC methodology to excel in law school exams and cold calls.
Case Facts & Court Holding
Key Facts & Case Background
F. W. Woolworth Company (Defendant) organized a promotional “ping-pong ball drop” at its store to attract customers. The event involved dropping 768 ping-pong balls, each containing a prize certificate, from an airplane into the store’s parking lot. Extensive advertising drew a crowd estimated at 4,500 people. The pilot hired for the drop warned the defendant that he could not control where the balls would fall. Lona Pearl Kirby (Plaintiff), a 70-year-old woman, went to the parking lot to watch the event. During the third drop, the crowd rushed to catch the falling balls, and in the ensuing chaos, someone knocked the plaintiff down and others ran over her, causing serious injuries, including a broken hip. There was evidence that other patrons had also been knocked down during the previous two drops. Plaintiff sued, alleging the defendant was negligent in failing to control the crowd it had amassed. The jury returned a verdict for the plaintiff.
Court Holding & Legal Precedent
Issue: Does a business proprietor who organizes a promotional event that attracts a large crowd owe a duty of reasonable care to protect an invitee from being injured by the foreseeable pushing and shoving of other patrons participating in the event?
Yes. The defendant owed a duty to exercise reasonable care to protect Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua. Ut enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exercitation ullamco laboris nisi ut aliquip ex ea commodo consequat. Duis aute irure dolor in reprehenderit in voluptate velit esse cillum dolore eu fugiat nu
IRAC Legal Analysis
About IRAC analysis
IRAC (Issue, Rule, Analysis, Conclusion) is the structure professors expect in exam answers. Each LSD.Law brief states the issue, the governing rule with citations, the court's application of that rule, and the conclusion - the same reasoning pattern you will use on exams and in practice.
Legal Issue
Does a business proprietor who organizes a promotional event that attracts a large crowd owe a duty of reasonable care to protect an invitee from being injured by the foreseeable pushing and shoving of other patrons participating in the event?
Conclusion
This case is a key precedent in premises liability, clarifying that a Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua. Ut eni
Legal Rule
When a proprietor or storekeeper causes a crowd of people to assemble Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua. Ut enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exercitation ullamco laboris nisi ut aliquip ex ea commodo consequat. Duis aute irure dolor in reprehenderit in voluptate velit esse cillum dolore eu fugiat nulla pariatur. Excepteur sint occaecat c
Legal Analysis
The Supreme Court of Alabama established a duty of care for proprietors Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua. Ut enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exercitation ullamco laboris nisi ut aliquip ex ea commodo consequat. Duis aute irure dolor in reprehenderit in voluptate velit esse cillum dolore eu fugiat nulla pariatur. Excepteur sint occaecat cupidatat non proident, sunt in culpa qui officia deserunt mollit anim id est laborum. Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua. Ut enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exercitation ullamco laboris nisi ut aliquip ex ea commodo consequat. Duis aute irure dolor in reprehenderit in voluptate velit esse cillum dolore eu fugiat nulla pariatur. Excepteur sint occaecat cupidatat non proident, sunt in culpa qui officia deserunt mollit anim id est laborum. Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua. Ut enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exercitation ullamco laboris nisi ut aliquip ex ea commodo consequat. Duis aute irure dolor in reprehenderit in voluptate velit esse cillum dolore eu fugiat nulla pariatur. Excepteur sint occaecat cupidatat non proident, sunt in culpa qui officia deserunt mollit anim id est laborum. Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore mag
Flash-to-Full Case Opinions
Flash Summary
- A business that organizes a promotional event has a duty to