Farag v. United States Case Brief

District Court, E.D. New York2008Docket #1348142
587 F. Supp. 2d 436 2008 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 95331 2008 WL 4965167

Complete case briefs with LSD+

Every LSD.Law brief pairs a full IRAC analysis with opinion summaries at three levels of depth, written by a team of Harvard Law and MIT graduates - a quick synopsis when you are pressed for time, the complete reasoning when you need to go deep.

Adaptive Case Views

Toggle between Flash, Standard, and Expanded. Get what you need, when you need it.

Exam-Ready IRAC Format

We deliver the precise structure professors look for in exam answers.

Complex Cases, Clarified

We break down dense legal reasoning into something digestible, helping you grasp core concepts.

Case Brief Summary & Legal Analysis

4 min read

tl;dr: Two men of Arab descent were detained at an airport based on seemingly suspicious but benign behavior. The court denied the government’s summary judgment motion, finding the detention was a de facto arrest and that the men’s ethnicity could not be used to establish probable cause.

Legal Significance: In a post-9/11 context, this case establishes that Arab ethnicity and speaking Arabic cannot serve as factors in the Fourth Amendment’s probable cause analysis to infer a propensity for terrorism, distinguishing such profiling from the use of race as a specific identifying characteristic.

Farag v. United States Law School Study Guide

Use this case brief structure for your own legal analysis. Focus on the IRAC methodology to excel in law school exams and cold calls.

Case Facts & Court Holding

Key Facts & Case Background

Plaintiffs Tarik Farag, a U.S. citizen and federal corrections officer, and Amro Elmasry, an Egyptian citizen, both of Arab descent, were observed by two undercover counterterrorism agents on a domestic flight. The agents found their behavior suspicious, citing their speaking in a mix of Arabic and English, changing seats to be closer, Elmasry looking at his watch, moving to the back of the plane without carry-on luggage, and Elmasry deleting contacts from his phone. Believing the plaintiffs might be conducting terrorist surveillance, the agents arranged for a police response upon landing. At JFK airport, at least ten officers in SWAT gear with police dogs met the plaintiffs. They were separated, frisked, handcuffed, transported to a Port Authority police station, and placed in separate jail cells. They were interrogated for several hours about their actions, religious beliefs, and potential terrorist connections before being released approximately four and a half hours later without any charges. The government moved for summary judgment, arguing the encounter was a lawful investigative stop or, alternatively, an arrest supported by probable cause.

Court Holding & Legal Precedent

Issue: Under the Fourth Amendment, does a four-and-a-half-hour detention involving handcuffs, transport to a police station, and confinement in a jail cell constitute a de facto arrest, and can a person’s Arab ethnicity be considered a factor in establishing probable cause for that arrest?

The court denied the government’s motion for summary judgment. It held that Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua. Ut enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exercitation ullamco laboris nisi ut aliquip ex ea commodo consequat. Duis aute irure dolor in reprehenderit in voluptate velit esse cillum dolore eu fugiat nulla pariatu

Read the full analysis

The complete holding, rule, and analysis for this case are available to LSD+ subscribers.

Start 14-Day Free Trial

IRAC Legal Analysis

Premium Feature Unlock

About IRAC analysis

IRAC (Issue, Rule, Analysis, Conclusion) is the structure professors expect in exam answers. Each LSD.Law brief states the issue, the governing rule with citations, the court's application of that rule, and the conclusion - the same reasoning pattern you will use on exams and in practice.

Legal Issue

Under the Fourth Amendment, does a four-and-a-half-hour detention involving handcuffs, transport to a police station, and confinement in a jail cell constitute a de facto arrest, and can a person’s Arab ethnicity be considered a factor in establishing probable cause for that arrest?

Conclusion

This decision serves as a significant judicial check on the use of Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua. Ut enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exerc

Legal Rule

A seizure becomes a de facto arrest requiring probable cause when it Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua. Ut enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exercitation ullamco laboris nisi ut aliquip ex ea commodo consequat. Duis aute irure dolor in reprehenderit in voluptate velit esse cillum dolore eu fugiat nulla pariatur. Excepteur sint occaecat cupidatat non proident, sunt in culpa qui officia deserunt mollit anim id est laboru

Legal Analysis

The court's analysis proceeded in two main parts. First, it determined that Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua. Ut enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exercitation ullamco laboris nisi ut aliquip ex ea commodo consequat. Duis aute irure dolor in reprehenderit in voluptate velit esse cillum dolore eu fugiat nulla pariatur. Excepteur sint occaecat cupidatat non proident, sunt in culpa qui officia deserunt mollit anim id est laborum. Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua. Ut enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exercitation ullamco laboris nisi ut aliquip ex ea commodo consequat. Duis aute irure dolor in reprehenderit in voluptate velit esse cillum dolore eu fugiat nulla pariatur. Excepteur sint occaecat cupidatat non proident, sunt in culpa qui officia deserunt mollit anim id est laborum. Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua. Ut enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exercitation ullamco laboris nisi ut aliquip ex ea commodo consequat. Duis aute irure dolor in reprehenderit in voluptate velit esse cillum dolore eu fugiat nulla pariatur. Excepteur sint occaecat cupidatat non proident, sunt in culpa qui officia deserunt mollit anim id est laborum. Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua. Ut enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exercitation ullamco laboris nisi ut aliquip ex ea commo

Flash-to-Full Case Opinions

Flash Summary

  • A post-9/11 detention involving a SWAT team, handcuffs, and a 4.5-hour
Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua. Ut enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exercitation ullamco laboris nisi ut aliquip ex ea commodo consequat. Duis aute irure dolor in reprehenderit in voluptate velit esse cillum dolore eu fugiat nulla pariatur. Excepteur sint occaecat cupidatat non proident, sunt in culpa qui offi

Read the full analysis

The complete holding, rule, and analysis for this case are available to LSD+ subscribers.

Start 14-Day Free Trial