Case Citation
Legal Case Name

Evans v. Braun Case Brief

Superior Court of Pennsylvania2010Docket #2415994
12 A.3d 395 2010 Pa. Super. 231 2010 Pa. Super. LEXIS 4614 2010 WL 5088761 Family Law Statutory Interpretation Civil Procedure

Why Top Law Students (And Those Aspiring to Be) Use LSD+ Briefs

Let's be real, law school is a marathon. Our exclusive Flash-to-Full case system is designed by Harvard Law School and MIT grads to match your pace: Quick summaries when you're slammed, detailed analysis when you need to go deep. Only LSD+ offers this kind of flexibility to genuinely fit your study flow.

Adaptive Case Views

Toggle between Flash, Standard, and Expanded. Get what you need, when you need it.

Exam-Ready IRAC Format

We deliver the precise structure professors look for in exam answers.

Complex Cases, Clarified

We break down dense legal reasoning into something digestible, helping you grasp core concepts.

Case Brief Summary & Legal Analysis

General Brief
3 min read

tl;dr: A court held that a brief, “stormy” dating relationship between coworkers qualifies as an “intimate partnership” under a domestic abuse statute, granting the petitioner standing to obtain a protective order after her partner threatened her with a gun.

Legal Significance: Expands the definition of “intimate partners” under domestic violence statutes to include short-term dating relationships lacking significant domestic interdependence. It prioritizes the existence of a chosen romantic bond, however brief, for establishing standing to seek a protective order.

Evans v. Braun Law School Study Guide

Use this case brief structure for your own legal analysis. Focus on the IRAC methodology to excel in law school exams and cold calls.

Case Facts & Court Holding

Key Facts & Case Background

Christine Evans and Gordon Braun, who were coworkers, engaged in a brief, “stormy” dating relationship. After one date, Braun showed Evans a handgun and remarked that it could “put a very big hole in her.” Later, following an argument outside a bar, Braun became aggressive. As Evans turned to leave, Braun exposed a semi-automatic pistol in his waistband and told her to “remember he still had the gun, and he was not afraid to use it.” Feeling threatened and intimidated, Evans fled. She reported the incident to her employer and was advised to contact the police, who referred her to a domestic violence agency. The agency filed a Protection from Abuse (PFA) petition on her behalf. The trial court issued a final PFA order, which Braun appealed, arguing that their relationship did not qualify them as “intimate partners” under the PFA Act and, therefore, Evans lacked standing.

Court Holding & Legal Precedent

Issue: Does a short-term dating relationship between coworkers constitute a “sexual or intimate partnership” sufficient to grant a petitioner standing to seek a protective order under Pennsylvania’s Protection from Abuse Act?

Yes. A short-term dating relationship qualifies as an “intimate partnership” under the Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua. Ut enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exercitation ullamco laboris nisi ut aliquip ex ea commodo consequat. Duis aute irure dolor in reprehenderit in voluptate velit esse cillum dolor

Master Every Case Faster

Unlock premium legal analysis that helps you quickly understand complex cases, designed by Harvard Law and MIT graduates. It's about working smarter, not just harder.

Start 14-Day Free Trial

Thousands of students are already saving time and gaining clarity. Why not you?

IRAC Legal Analysis

Premium Feature Unlock

Complete IRAC Analysis for Higher Grades

IRAC (Issue, Rule, Analysis, Conclusion) is the exact format professors want to see in your exam answers. Our exclusive Flash-to-Full briefs combine holding, analysis, and rule statements formatted to match what A+ students produce in exams. These structured briefs help reinforce the essential legal reasoning patterns expected in law school.

Legal Issue

Does a short-term dating relationship between coworkers constitute a “sexual or intimate partnership” sufficient to grant a petitioner standing to seek a protective order under Pennsylvania’s Protection from Abuse Act?

Conclusion

This case establishes that the threshold for an "intimate partnership" under domestic Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua. Ut enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exercitation ullamco laboris nisi ut aliquip ex ea commodo consequat. Duis aute irure dolor in repreh

Legal Rule

Under Pennsylvania's Protection from Abuse Act, a person has standing to seek Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua. Ut enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exercitation ullamco laboris nisi ut aliquip ex ea commodo consequat. Duis aute irure dolor in reprehenderit in voluptate velit esse cillum dolore eu fugiat nulla pariatur. Excepteur sint occaecat cupidatat non proident, sunt in culpa qui offic

Legal Analysis

The court affirmed the PFA order, holding that Evans had standing as Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua. Ut enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exercitation ullamco laboris nisi ut aliquip ex ea commodo consequat. Duis aute irure dolor in reprehenderit in voluptate velit esse cillum dolore eu fugiat nulla pariatur. Excepteur sint occaecat cupidatat non proident, sunt in culpa qui officia deserunt mollit anim id est laborum. Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua. Ut enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exercitation ullamco laboris nisi ut aliquip ex ea commodo consequat. Duis aute irure dolor in reprehenderit in voluptate velit esse cillum dolore eu fugiat nulla pariatur. Excepteur sint occaecat cupidatat non proident, sunt in culpa qui officia deserunt mollit anim id est laborum. Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua. Ut enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exercitation ullamco laboris nisi ut aliquip ex ea commodo consequat. Duis aute irure dolor in reprehenderit in voluptate velit esse cillum dolore eu fugiat nulla pariatur. Excepteur sint occaecat cupidatat non proident, sunt in culpa qui officia deserunt mollit anim id est laborum. Lorem ipsum

Flash-to-Full Case Opinions

Flash Summary

  • A “dating relationship,” even if brief, can constitute a “sexual or
Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua. Ut enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exercitation ullamco laboris nisi ut aliquip ex ea commodo consequat. Duis aute irure dolor in reprehenderit in voluptate velit esse cillum dolore eu fugiat nulla pariatur. Excepteur sint occaecat cupidatat non proident,

Master Every Case Faster

Unlock premium legal analysis that helps you quickly understand complex cases, designed by Harvard Law and MIT graduates. It's about working smarter, not just harder.

Start 14-Day Free Trial

Thousands of students are already saving time and gaining clarity. Why not you?