East 13th Street Homesteaders' Coalition v. Lower East Side Coalition Housing Development Case Brief
Complete case briefs with LSD+
Every LSD.Law brief pairs a full IRAC analysis with opinion summaries at three levels of depth, written by a team of Harvard Law and MIT graduates - a quick synopsis when you are pressed for time, the complete reasoning when you need to go deep.
Adaptive Case Views
Toggle between Flash, Standard, and Expanded. Get what you need, when you need it.
Exam-Ready IRAC Format
We deliver the precise structure professors look for in exam answers.
Complex Cases, Clarified
We break down dense legal reasoning into something digestible, helping you grasp core concepts.
Case Brief Summary & Legal Analysis
tl;dr: Squatters claiming title to city-owned buildings by adverse possession were denied an injunction against eviction. The court found they could not prove the required ten years of continuous possession due to the city’s repeated re-entry and a lack of privity between successive occupants.
Legal Significance: This case clarifies the “continuous possession” and “tacking” requirements for adverse possession, holding that intermittent occupancy by unrelated individuals, interrupted by the owner’s re-entry, fails to satisfy the continuity element, even if the occupants are part of a cohesive group.
Case Facts & Court Holding
Key Facts & Case Background
The City of New York acquired title to four abandoned apartment buildings in the late 1970s. By the early 1980s, the buildings had fallen into significant disrepair. Petitioners, a coalition of “homesteaders,” began occupying the buildings and claimed to have adversely possessed the properties for a ten-year period from 1984 to 1994. During this time, the City repeatedly exercised its ownership rights by sealing the buildings, forcing the occupants to break the seals, sometimes with a sledgehammer, to re-enter. The occupants were not a single, continuous group; rather, different individuals and families moved in and out of various apartments over the years. There was no evidence of formal transfers or privity between these successive occupants. Some apartments were vacant for periods, and new occupants often had no contact with the prior ones. The petitioners brought an action to establish title by adverse possession and sought a preliminary injunction to prevent the City from evicting them to begin a federally subsidized rehabilitation project.
Court Holding & Legal Precedent
Issue: For the purpose of establishing a likelihood of success on an adverse possession claim, can the possession of various, unrelated occupants be tacked together to satisfy the ten-year continuous possession requirement, particularly when the true owner has intermittently re-entered and sealed the property?
No. The court reversed the grant of a preliminary injunction, holding that Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua. Ut enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exercitation ullamco laboris nisi ut aliquip ex ea commodo consequat. Duis aute irure dolor in reprehenderit in voluptate velit esse cillum dolore eu fugiat nulla pariatur. Excepteur sint occaecat cupidatat non proident, sunt i
IRAC Legal Analysis
About IRAC analysis
IRAC (Issue, Rule, Analysis, Conclusion) is the structure professors expect in exam answers. Each LSD.Law brief states the issue, the governing rule with citations, the court's application of that rule, and the conclusion - the same reasoning pattern you will use on exams and in practice.
Legal Issue
For the purpose of establishing a likelihood of success on an adverse possession claim, can the possession of various, unrelated occupants be tacked together to satisfy the ten-year continuous possession requirement, particularly when the true owner has intermittently re-entered and sealed the property?
Conclusion
The case serves as a key precedent illustrating the strict requirements for Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua. Ut enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exercitation ullamco laboris nisi ut aliquip ex ea commodo consequat. Duis aute irure dolor in reprehenderit in voluptate velit esse cillum dolor
Legal Rule
To establish title by adverse possession without a written instrument, a claimant Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua. Ut enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exercitation ullamco laboris nisi ut aliquip ex ea commodo consequat. Duis aute irure dolor in reprehenderit in voluptate velit esse cillum dolore eu fugiat nulla pariatur. Excepteur sint occaecat cupidatat non proident, sunt in culpa qui officia deserunt moll
Legal Analysis
The court's analysis centered on the petitioners' inability to satisfy the "continuous Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua. Ut enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exercitation ullamco laboris nisi ut aliquip ex ea commodo consequat. Duis aute irure dolor in reprehenderit in voluptate velit esse cillum dolore eu fugiat nulla pariatur. Excepteur sint occaecat cupidatat non proident, sunt in culpa qui officia deserunt mollit anim id est laborum. Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua. Ut enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exercitation ullamco laboris nisi ut aliquip ex ea commodo consequat. Duis aute irure dolor in reprehenderit in voluptate velit esse cillum dolore eu fugiat nulla pariatur. Excepteur sint occaecat cupidatat non proident, sunt in culpa qui officia deserunt mollit anim id est laborum. Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua. Ut enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exercitation ullamco laboris nisi ut aliquip ex ea commodo consequat. Duis aute irure dolor in reprehenderit in voluptate velit esse cillum dolore eu fugiat nulla pariatur. Excepteur sint occaecat cupidatat non proident, sunt in culpa qui officia deserunt mollit anim id est laborum. Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua. Ut enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exercitation ullamco laboris nisi ut aliquip ex ea comm
Flash-to-Full Case Opinions
Flash Summary
- Appellate court reversed a preliminary injunction for occupants claiming adverse possession