Crandall v. Nevada Case Brief
Complete case briefs with LSD+
Every LSD.Law brief pairs a full IRAC analysis with opinion summaries at three levels of depth, written by a team of Harvard Law and MIT graduates - a quick synopsis when you are pressed for time, the complete reasoning when you need to go deep.
Adaptive Case Views
Toggle between Flash, Standard, and Expanded. Get what you need, when you need it.
Exam-Ready IRAC Format
We deliver the precise structure professors look for in exam answers.
Complex Cases, Clarified
We break down dense legal reasoning into something digestible, helping you grasp core concepts.
Case Brief Summary & Legal Analysis
tl;dr: Nevada taxed people for leaving the state. The Supreme Court struck down the tax, finding a fundamental right to travel between states inherent in the U.S. Constitution, which no state can obstruct.
Legal Significance: This case established a constitutional right to interstate travel, grounding it not in the Commerce Clause but in the structural principles of federalism and the nature of national citizenship, predating the Privileges or Immunities Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment.
Case Facts & Court Holding
Key Facts & Case Background
A Nevada statute from 1865 imposed a “capitation tax of one dollar upon every person leaving the State” by railroad or stagecoach. The law mandated that operators of these common carriers collect the tax from each passenger and remit it to the state. Crandall, an agent for a stagecoach company, was arrested and held in custody after he refused to report and pay the taxes for passengers his company transported out of Nevada. He challenged the statute’s constitutionality, arguing that it infringed upon powers of the federal government and the rights of citizens. The Supreme Court of Nevada upheld the law, finding it did not violate the Commerce Clause or the Import-Export Clause of the U.S. Constitution. Crandall then brought the case to the U.S. Supreme Court to determine whether a state has the power to tax individuals for the privilege of passing through or leaving its territory.
Court Holding & Legal Precedent
Issue: Does a state law imposing a tax on every person leaving the state by a common carrier violate the United States Constitution?
Yes. The Nevada law is unconstitutional because it impermissibly burdens a citizen’s Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua. Ut enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exercitation ullamco laboris nisi ut aliquip ex e
IRAC Legal Analysis
About IRAC analysis
IRAC (Issue, Rule, Analysis, Conclusion) is the structure professors expect in exam answers. Each LSD.Law brief states the issue, the governing rule with citations, the court's application of that rule, and the conclusion - the same reasoning pattern you will use on exams and in practice.
Legal Issue
Does a state law imposing a tax on every person leaving the state by a common carrier violate the United States Constitution?
Conclusion
This case is a landmark decision establishing the constitutional right to interstate Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua. Ut enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exercitation ullamco laboris nisi ut aliquip ex ea commodo consequat. Duis aute irur
Legal Rule
A state cannot impose a tax on persons for the right to Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua. Ut enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exercitation ullamco laboris nisi ut aliqu
Legal Analysis
The Court, speaking through Justice Miller, chose not to decide the case Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua. Ut enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exercitation ullamco laboris nisi ut aliquip ex ea commodo consequat. Duis aute irure dolor in reprehenderit in voluptate velit esse cillum dolore eu fugiat nulla pariatur. Excepteur sint occaecat cupidatat non proident, sunt in culpa qui officia deserunt mollit anim id est laborum. Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua. Ut enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exercitation ullamco laboris nisi ut aliquip ex ea commodo consequat. Duis aute irure dolor in reprehenderit in voluptate velit esse cillum dolore eu fugiat nulla pariatur. Excepteur sint occaecat cupidatat non proident, sunt in culpa qui officia deserunt mollit anim id est laborum. Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua. Ut enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exercitation ullamco laboris nisi ut aliquip ex ea commodo consequat. Duis aute irure dolor in reprehenderit in voluptate velit esse cillum dolore eu fugiat nulla pariat
Flash-to-Full Case Opinions
Flash Summary
- Holding: A state law imposing a tax on individuals leaving the