BUTLER v. MCDONALD'S CORP. Case Brief
Complete case briefs with LSD+
Every LSD.Law brief pairs a full IRAC analysis with opinion summaries at three levels of depth, written by a team of Harvard Law and MIT graduates - a quick synopsis when you are pressed for time, the complete reasoning when you need to go deep.
Adaptive Case Views
Toggle between Flash, Standard, and Expanded. Get what you need, when you need it.
Exam-Ready IRAC Format
We deliver the precise structure professors look for in exam answers.
Complex Cases, Clarified
We break down dense legal reasoning into something digestible, helping you grasp core concepts.
Case Brief Summary & Legal Analysis
tl;dr: A franchisor (McDonald’s) sought summary judgment after a customer was injured at a franchisee’s restaurant. The court denied the motion, finding a jury could hold the franchisor liable under theories of actual or apparent agency due to its extensive control over the franchisee’s operations.
Legal Significance: Establishes that a franchisor’s extensive control over a franchisee’s operations—through manuals, inspections, and branding—can create a genuine issue of material fact regarding both actual and apparent agency, exposing the franchisor to vicarious liability for the franchisee’s torts.
BUTLER v. MCDONALD'S CORP. Law School Study Guide
Use this case brief structure for your own legal analysis. Focus on the IRAC methodology to excel in law school exams and cold calls.
Case Facts & Court Holding
Key Facts & Case Background
The plaintiff, a minor, was injured when a glass door shattered at a McDonald’s restaurant in North Kingstown, Rhode Island. The restaurant was owned and operated by James Cooper, a franchisee, under a lease and license agreement with the defendant, McDonald’s Corporation. The plaintiff alleged that a pre-existing “spider crack” in the door, which had been present for over two weeks, created an unsafe condition that proximately caused his injury. The franchise agreement explicitly stated that no agency relationship was created and that the franchisee was an independent contractor responsible for maintenance. However, the agreement also required the franchisee to adhere to McDonald’s “comprehensive” system, detailed in operational and training manuals. The defendant franchisor retained rights to conduct frequent inspections of the premises and operations and could terminate the franchise for material breaches. The restaurant featured McDonald’s ubiquitous branding, logos, and employee uniforms, making it indistinguishable from a corporate-owned location. The defendant moved for summary judgment, arguing it owed no duty and could not be held vicariously liable for the franchisee’s alleged negligence.
Court Holding & Legal Precedent
Issue: Can a franchisor be held vicariously liable for the negligence of its franchisee when the franchise agreement disclaims an agency relationship, but the franchisor retains extensive control over the franchisee’s daily operations and projects a uniform brand identity to the public?
Yes. The court denied the defendant’s motion for summary judgment, holding that Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua. Ut enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exercitation ullamco laboris nisi ut aliquip ex
IRAC Legal Analysis
About IRAC analysis
IRAC (Issue, Rule, Analysis, Conclusion) is the structure professors expect in exam answers. Each LSD.Law brief states the issue, the governing rule with citations, the court's application of that rule, and the conclusion - the same reasoning pattern you will use on exams and in practice.
Legal Issue
Can a franchisor be held vicariously liable for the negligence of its franchisee when the franchise agreement disclaims an agency relationship, but the franchisor retains extensive control over the franchisee’s daily operations and projects a uniform brand identity to the public?
Conclusion
This case demonstrates how courts can look past formal disclaimers in franchise Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua. Ut enim ad minim veniam, quis nostru
Legal Rule
A franchisor may be held vicariously liable for its franchisee's torts if Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua. Ut enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exercitation ullamco laboris nisi ut aliquip ex ea commodo consequat. Duis aute irure dolor in reprehenderit in voluptate velit esse cillum dolore eu fugiat null
Legal Analysis
The court analyzed two primary theories of vicarious liability: actual agency and Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua. Ut enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exercitation ullamco laboris nisi ut aliquip ex ea commodo consequat. Duis aute irure dolor in reprehenderit in voluptate velit esse cillum dolore eu fugiat nulla pariatur. Excepteur sint occaecat cupidatat non proident, sunt in culpa qui officia deserunt mollit anim id est laborum. Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua. Ut enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exercitation ullamco laboris nisi ut aliquip ex ea commodo consequat. Duis aute irure dolor in reprehenderit in voluptate velit esse cillum dolore eu fugiat nulla pariatur. Excepteur sint occaecat cupidatat non proident, sunt in culpa qui officia deserunt mollit anim id est laborum. Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua. Ut enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exercitation ullamco laboris nisi ut aliquip ex ea commodo consequat. Duis aute irure dolor in reprehenderit in voluptate velit esse cillum dolore eu fugiat nulla pariatur. Excepteur sint occaecat cupidatat non proident, sunt in culpa qui officia deserunt mollit anim id est laborum. Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua. Ut enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exercitation ullamco laboris nisi ut aliquip ex ea commodo consequat. Duis aute irure dolor in reprehenderit in voluptate velit esse cillum d
Flash-to-Full Case Opinions
Flash Summary
- A franchisor may be vicariously liable for a franchisee’s negligence if