Case Citation
Legal Case Name

BUSTAMANTE v. MASSANARI Case Brief

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit2001
262 F.3d 949 Administrative Law Social Security Disability Law Civil Procedure

Why Top Law Students (And Those Aspiring to Be) Use LSD+ Briefs

Let's be real, law school is a marathon. Our exclusive Flash-to-Full case system is designed by Harvard Law School and MIT grads to match your pace: Quick summaries when you're slammed, detailed analysis when you need to go deep. Only LSD+ offers this kind of flexibility to genuinely fit your study flow.

Adaptive Case Views

Toggle between Flash, Standard, and Expanded. Get what you need, when you need it.

Exam-Ready IRAC Format

We deliver the precise structure professors look for in exam answers.

Complex Cases, Clarified

We break down dense legal reasoning into something digestible, helping you grasp core concepts.

Case Brief Summary & Legal Analysis

General Brief
3 min read

tl;dr: An Administrative Law Judge (ALJ) improperly denied disability benefits by considering the claimant’s alcoholism before completing the required five-step disability analysis. The court reversed, holding the agency must first find a claimant disabled before determining if alcoholism is a disqualifying factor.

Legal Significance: This case establishes that an agency must complete its standard, multi-step adjudicative process for determining disability before applying a statutory bar. An ALJ cannot prematurely conclude that alcoholism is the cause of other impairments to short-circuit the required sequential evaluation.

BUSTAMANTE v. MASSANARI Law School Study Guide

Use this case brief structure for your own legal analysis. Focus on the IRAC methodology to excel in law school exams and cold calls.

Case Facts & Court Holding

Key Facts & Case Background

Joseph Bustamante applied for Social Security disability benefits, alleging impairments including diabetes, memory problems, anxiety, and a long history of alcohol abuse. An Administrative Law Judge (ALJ) conducted a hearing and reviewed medical evidence. The ALJ found that Bustamante had a personality disorder and a substance abuse addiction but concluded at step two of the sequential evaluation process that his mental impairments were not independently severe because they were the “product and consequence of his alcohol abuse.” The ALJ also found that Bustamante’s alcoholism did not reach a disabling level of severity. Ultimately, the ALJ concluded that “alcohol abuse is a contributing factor material to a finding of disability” and denied benefits. Multiple medical experts had examined Bustamante, with reports indicating a mood disorder, marked cognitive and functional impairments, and psychotic symptoms that one psychiatrist noted increased when alcohol consumption decreased. The SSA Appeals Council and the federal district court affirmed the ALJ’s decision.

Court Holding & Legal Precedent

Issue: Did the Administrative Law Judge commit legal error by determining that a claimant’s mental impairments were a consequence of his alcoholism before completing the five-step sequential evaluation process to determine if the claimant was disabled?

Yes. The court reversed and remanded, holding that the ALJ committed legal Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua. Ut enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exercitation ullamco laboris nisi ut aliquip ex ea commodo consequat. Duis aute irure dolor in reprehenderit in voluptate velit esse cillum dolore eu fugiat nulla pariatur. Excepteur sint

Master Every Case Faster

Unlock premium legal analysis that helps you quickly understand complex cases, designed by Harvard Law and MIT graduates. It's about working smarter, not just harder.

Start 14-Day Free Trial

Thousands of students are already saving time and gaining clarity. Why not you?

IRAC Legal Analysis

Premium Feature Unlock

Complete IRAC Analysis for Higher Grades

IRAC (Issue, Rule, Analysis, Conclusion) is the exact format professors want to see in your exam answers. Our exclusive Flash-to-Full briefs combine holding, analysis, and rule statements formatted to match what A+ students produce in exams. These structured briefs help reinforce the essential legal reasoning patterns expected in law school.

Legal Issue

Did the Administrative Law Judge commit legal error by determining that a claimant’s mental impairments were a consequence of his alcoholism before completing the five-step sequential evaluation process to determine if the claimant was disabled?

Conclusion

This decision reinforces a strict procedural sequence for disability claims involving alcoholism, Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua. Ut enim

Legal Rule

An Administrative Law Judge must first complete the five-step sequential evaluation to Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua. Ut enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exercitation ullamco laboris nisi ut aliquip ex ea commodo consequat. Duis aute irure dolor in reprehenderit in voluptate velit esse cillum dolore eu fugia

Legal Analysis

The Ninth Circuit's analysis centered on the plain language of the Social Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua. Ut enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exercitation ullamco laboris nisi ut aliquip ex ea commodo consequat. Duis aute irure dolor in reprehenderit in voluptate velit esse cillum dolore eu fugiat nulla pariatur. Excepteur sint occaecat cupidatat non proident, sunt in culpa qui officia deserunt mollit anim id est laborum. Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua. Ut enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exercitation ullamco laboris nisi ut aliquip ex ea commodo consequat. Duis aute irure dolor in reprehenderit in voluptate velit esse cillum dolore eu fugiat nulla pariatur. Excepteur sint occaecat cupidatat non proident, sunt in culpa qui officia deserunt mollit anim id est laborum. Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua. Ut enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exercitation ullamco laboris nisi ut aliquip ex ea commodo consequat. Duis aute irure dolor in reprehenderit in voluptate velit esse cillum dolore eu fugiat nulla pariatur. Excepteur sint occaecat cupidatat non proident, sunt in culpa qui officia deserunt mollit anim id est laborum. Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua. Ut enim ad minim veniam, quis nos

Flash-to-Full Case Opinions

Flash Summary

  • An ALJ must complete the five-step disability evaluation before determining if
Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua. Ut enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exercitation ullamco laboris nisi ut aliquip ex ea commodo consequat. Duis aute irure dolor in reprehenderit in voluptate velit esse cillum dolore eu fugiat nulla pariatur. Excepteur sint occaecat cupidata

Master Every Case Faster

Unlock premium legal analysis that helps you quickly understand complex cases, designed by Harvard Law and MIT graduates. It's about working smarter, not just harder.

Start 14-Day Free Trial

Thousands of students are already saving time and gaining clarity. Why not you?